Gap pre-pulse inhibition of the cortical auditory evoked potentials as a possible objective tinnitus assessment tool.

IF 0.8 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Iranian Journal of Child Neurology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI:10.22037/ijcn.v17i4.42300
Soheila Shayanmehr, Nariman Rahbar, Akram Pourbakht, Seyyed Jalal Sameni, Malihe Mazaher Yazdi
{"title":"Gap pre-pulse inhibition of the cortical auditory evoked potentials as a possible objective tinnitus assessment tool.","authors":"Soheila Shayanmehr, Nariman Rahbar, Akram Pourbakht, Seyyed Jalal Sameni, Malihe Mazaher Yazdi","doi":"10.22037/ijcn.v17i4.42300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective assessment tests overcome the variability of subjective methods. Cortical recordings with gap pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex stimulus have been used as objective tinnitus assessments in humans. This study aims to investigate this possible objective tinnitus test and compare gap-induced inhibition in different stimulus parameters and brain regions.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Twenty People (18-50 years old) without hearing loss and tinnitus were included. The sound stimuli consisted of continuous background noise with a loud startle tone preceded by a silent gap (20 and 40 ms duration, 120 and 150 ms distance from the startle). The N1-P2 complex amplitude and topoplot maps were extracted in 27-channel cortical response recording after signal processing. Four brain regions of interest (ROI) of anterior-frontal, centro-frontal, right, and left temporal were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the maximum inhibition occurred in a 40 ms gap duration and 150 ms distance in all 4 ROIs. In comparing ROIs, the centro-frontal and left temporal regions revealed the most inhibition (p<0.05). The decrease in the amplitude of the N1 and P2 in that region could also be traced in the 100 and 200 ms topoplots.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gap-induced inhibition was observed in all gap-embedded stimuli and all ROIs. However, the 40-150 mode and centro-frontal and left temporal regions had maximum inhibition in normal subjects. It provides a promising tool for objectively assessing tinnitus in humans with particular implications in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":14537,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v17i4.42300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective assessment tests overcome the variability of subjective methods. Cortical recordings with gap pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex stimulus have been used as objective tinnitus assessments in humans. This study aims to investigate this possible objective tinnitus test and compare gap-induced inhibition in different stimulus parameters and brain regions.

Materials & methods: Twenty People (18-50 years old) without hearing loss and tinnitus were included. The sound stimuli consisted of continuous background noise with a loud startle tone preceded by a silent gap (20 and 40 ms duration, 120 and 150 ms distance from the startle). The N1-P2 complex amplitude and topoplot maps were extracted in 27-channel cortical response recording after signal processing. Four brain regions of interest (ROI) of anterior-frontal, centro-frontal, right, and left temporal were investigated.

Results: The results showed that the maximum inhibition occurred in a 40 ms gap duration and 150 ms distance in all 4 ROIs. In comparing ROIs, the centro-frontal and left temporal regions revealed the most inhibition (p<0.05). The decrease in the amplitude of the N1 and P2 in that region could also be traced in the 100 and 200 ms topoplots.

Conclusion: Gap-induced inhibition was observed in all gap-embedded stimuli and all ROIs. However, the 40-150 mode and centro-frontal and left temporal regions had maximum inhibition in normal subjects. It provides a promising tool for objectively assessing tinnitus in humans with particular implications in children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将皮层听觉诱发电位的间隙前脉冲抑制作为一种可能的客观耳鸣评估工具。
目标:客观评估测试克服了主观方法的多变性。对声学惊跳反射刺激进行间隙前脉冲抑制的皮层记录已被用作人类耳鸣的客观评估。本研究旨在研究这种可能的客观耳鸣测试,并比较不同刺激参数和脑区的间隙诱导抑制:研究对象包括 20 名无听力损失且无耳鸣的人(18-50 岁)。声音刺激包括连续的背景噪声和一声响亮的惊吓声,惊吓声之前有一个无声间隙(持续时间分别为 20 和 40 毫秒,与惊吓声的距离分别为 120 和 150 毫秒)。经过信号处理后,从 27 个通道的皮层反应记录中提取 N1-P2 复振幅和拓扑图。研究了前额叶、中央额叶、右颞叶和左颞叶四个大脑感兴趣区(ROI):结果表明,在所有 4 个 ROI 中,最大抑制发生在 40 毫秒间隙持续时间和 150 毫秒距离内。在对 ROI 进行比较时,中央额叶和左颞区的抑制作用最强(p 结论:间隙诱导的抑制作用在所有 4 个 ROI 中都存在:在所有间隙嵌入刺激和所有 ROI 中都观察到了间隙诱导抑制。然而,在正常受试者中,40-150 模式、额叶中央区和左颞区的抑制作用最大。它为客观评估人类耳鸣提供了一种很有前途的工具,尤其对儿童耳鸣具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Cerebral Necrotizing Encephalopathy in a 7-year-old Child after being Infected with COVID-19, A Case Report. Dehydrogenase (DLD) Deficiency in an Iranian Patient with Recurrent Intractable Vomiting: Successful Treatment with Thiamine Supplementation. Evaluation of Neurological and Auditory Development in Children with Congenital Heart Disease using Essence Q Questionnaire and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Test. Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy Indicators of Sarnat and Sarnat Scoring in Neonatal Subjects with Perinatal Asphyxia. Identification of a Novel Variant in CC2D1A Gene Linked to Autosomal Recessive Intellectual Disability 3 in an Iranian Family and Investigating the Structure and Pleiotropic Effects of this Gene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1