Validation, performance, and reliability of two automated tests for vitamin B12 and folate assay.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Research Pub Date : 2023-12-13 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1177/22799036231217803
Simone Bianciardi, Giulia Tesi, Helena Cerutti, Alessandra Cartocci, Roberto Guerranti, Caterina Silvestrini, Sabrina Gori, Tommaso Bandini, Alessandra Brogi, Roberto Leoncini
{"title":"Validation, performance, and reliability of two automated tests for vitamin B12 and folate assay.","authors":"Simone Bianciardi, Giulia Tesi, Helena Cerutti, Alessandra Cartocci, Roberto Guerranti, Caterina Silvestrini, Sabrina Gori, Tommaso Bandini, Alessandra Brogi, Roberto Leoncini","doi":"10.1177/22799036231217803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deficiency of Vitamin B12 and folate may determine hematological, neurological, and metabolic alterations; therefore, an accurate quantification of their serum levels is required, especially in the presence of symptoms that might suggest a deficiency. CHORUS VIT B12 and CHORUS FOLATE are two automated immunoassays, developed to quantify vitamin B12 and folate, respectively, in human serum.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>This single-center, non-pharmacological, diagnostic study described the validation and characterization of CHORUS VIT B12 and CHORUS FOLATE, with a specific focus on performance, precision, and reliability. For each assay, 500 serum samples were analyzed. A comparison between CHORUS assays and commercially available kit was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For CHORUS VIT B12 the lower limit of quantification (LLoQ) was 165.0 pg/mL and the upper LoQ (ULoQ) was 1846.8 pg/mL. The assay was linear within the calibration range (150-2000 pg/mL) and the accuracy was described with the International Standard Vitamin B12, Serum Folate, HOLO TC (NIBSC code: 03/178), with a mean recovery on two lots of 111%. For CHORUS FOLATE (calibration range of 2.0-20.0 ng/mL), LLoQ was 2.0 ng/mL and ULoQ 19.6 ng/mL. The linearity was demonstrated from 2.4 to 20.0 ng/mL; the accuracy was described with the International Standard mentioned above, achieving a mean recovery on three lots of 92%. The lowest and highest values of both CHORUS and COBAS kits were similar and the median values did not significantly vary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CHORUS VIT B12 and CHORUS FOLATE performed well, accurately, and reliably in quantifying vitamin B12 and folate in human serum.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"12 4","pages":"22799036231217803"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10722937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036231217803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deficiency of Vitamin B12 and folate may determine hematological, neurological, and metabolic alterations; therefore, an accurate quantification of their serum levels is required, especially in the presence of symptoms that might suggest a deficiency. CHORUS VIT B12 and CHORUS FOLATE are two automated immunoassays, developed to quantify vitamin B12 and folate, respectively, in human serum.

Design and methods: This single-center, non-pharmacological, diagnostic study described the validation and characterization of CHORUS VIT B12 and CHORUS FOLATE, with a specific focus on performance, precision, and reliability. For each assay, 500 serum samples were analyzed. A comparison between CHORUS assays and commercially available kit was also performed.

Results: For CHORUS VIT B12 the lower limit of quantification (LLoQ) was 165.0 pg/mL and the upper LoQ (ULoQ) was 1846.8 pg/mL. The assay was linear within the calibration range (150-2000 pg/mL) and the accuracy was described with the International Standard Vitamin B12, Serum Folate, HOLO TC (NIBSC code: 03/178), with a mean recovery on two lots of 111%. For CHORUS FOLATE (calibration range of 2.0-20.0 ng/mL), LLoQ was 2.0 ng/mL and ULoQ 19.6 ng/mL. The linearity was demonstrated from 2.4 to 20.0 ng/mL; the accuracy was described with the International Standard mentioned above, achieving a mean recovery on three lots of 92%. The lowest and highest values of both CHORUS and COBAS kits were similar and the median values did not significantly vary.

Conclusion: CHORUS VIT B12 and CHORUS FOLATE performed well, accurately, and reliably in quantifying vitamin B12 and folate in human serum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维生素 B12 和叶酸测定的两种自动测试的验证、性能和可靠性。
背景:缺乏维生素 B12 和叶酸可能导致血液学、神经学和新陈代谢的改变;因此,需要对血清中的维生素 B12 和叶酸水平进行准确定量,尤其是在出现可能提示缺乏的症状时。CHORUS VIT B12 和 CHORUS FOLATE 是两种自动免疫测定法,分别用于定量检测人体血清中的维生素 B12 和叶酸:这项单中心、非药物性的诊断研究描述了 CHORUS VIT B12 和 CHORUS FOLATE 的验证和特征,重点关注其性能、精确度和可靠性。每种检测方法都分析了 500 份血清样本。此外,还对 CHORUS 检测试剂盒和市售试剂盒进行了比较:CHORUS VIT B12 的定量下限(LLoQ)为 165.0 pg/mL,定量上限(ULoQ)为 1846.8 pg/mL。该检测方法在校准范围(150-2000 pg/mL)内呈线性,准确度参照国际标准维生素 B12、血清叶酸、HOLO TC(NIBSC 代码:03/178),两个批次的平均回收率为 111%。对于叶酸钙(校准范围为 2.0-20.0 纳克/毫升),LLoQ 为 2.0 纳克/毫升,ULoQ 为 19.6 纳克/毫升。线性范围为 2.4 至 20.0 纳克/毫升;准确度参照了上述国际标准,三个批次的平均回收率为 92%。CHORUS和COBAS试剂盒的最低值和最高值相似,中位值没有显著差异:结论:CHORUS VIT B12 和 CHORUS FOLATE 在定量检测人体血清中的维生素 B12 和叶酸方面表现良好、准确、可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Research
Journal of Public Health Research PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.
期刊最新文献
Factors on medical clerkship students' quality of life: A survey study. Magseed preoperative localization in non-palpable breast lesions: Our single-center Breast Unit experience. Analyzing diversity trends in dermatology: A comprehensive overview. Reproducibility and explainability in digital pathology: The need to make black-box artificial intelligence systems more transparent. Healthcare students are faced with the issue of the rights of people with disabilities and the quality of services: Are we training future healthcare workers who overemphasize technology?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1