Advancing Environmental Justice in the Community Using Charrette: A Case Study in Boston Chinatown.

IF 1.7 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1089/env.2022.0001
Noelle C Dimitri, Shir Lerman Ginzburg, Sharon Ron, Daphne Xu, Sophia Angali England, Lydia Lowe, Pilar Botana, Cristina Araujo Brinkerhoff, Samiya Haque, Doug Brugge, Linda Sprague Martinez
{"title":"Advancing Environmental Justice in the Community Using Charrette: A Case Study in Boston Chinatown.","authors":"Noelle C Dimitri, Shir Lerman Ginzburg, Sharon Ron, Daphne Xu, Sophia Angali England, Lydia Lowe, Pilar Botana, Cristina Araujo Brinkerhoff, Samiya Haque, Doug Brugge, Linda Sprague Martinez","doi":"10.1089/env.2022.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community research partners in Boston Chinatown implemented a planning charrette as a part of a community-based participatory study focused on near highway research and public health action to mitigate traffic-related air pollution (TRAP). Charrettes are intensive workshops for solution-oriented design and planning used to bring together diverse stakeholders to address complex environmental health concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The planning charrette included three phases: (1) community meetings and resident interviews, (2) a planning charrette to address community health concerns and air pollution within larger community wellness goals, and (3) development of a Master Planning document with policy, project, and practice recommendations to guide future community advocacy.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Intergenerational residents, community leaders, planners, researchers, and volunteers (<i>N</i> = 90) joined a day-long planning charrette to inform the Chinatown Master Plan. Workshops were informed by resident interviews focused on finding solutions to three resident identified priorities: Healthy Housing, Healthy Mobility, and Healthy Public Realm. Air pollution mitigation strategies were embedded in discussions around each priority area.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The charrette provided an opportunity for community stakeholders to voice concerns about TRAP as part of a new framework focused on health and wellness. Concerns about pedestrian safety, housing access, and expansion of green and recreational spaces were highlighted by participants as important areas for further development.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Boston Chinatown residents reaffirmed their investment in the community by highlighting concerns about TRAP within the context of other health-related concerns. Charrettes offer a vehicle to advance environmental justice in communities through collective problem-solving and decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2022.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community research partners in Boston Chinatown implemented a planning charrette as a part of a community-based participatory study focused on near highway research and public health action to mitigate traffic-related air pollution (TRAP). Charrettes are intensive workshops for solution-oriented design and planning used to bring together diverse stakeholders to address complex environmental health concerns.

Methods: The planning charrette included three phases: (1) community meetings and resident interviews, (2) a planning charrette to address community health concerns and air pollution within larger community wellness goals, and (3) development of a Master Planning document with policy, project, and practice recommendations to guide future community advocacy.

Outcomes: Intergenerational residents, community leaders, planners, researchers, and volunteers (N = 90) joined a day-long planning charrette to inform the Chinatown Master Plan. Workshops were informed by resident interviews focused on finding solutions to three resident identified priorities: Healthy Housing, Healthy Mobility, and Healthy Public Realm. Air pollution mitigation strategies were embedded in discussions around each priority area.

Discussion: The charrette provided an opportunity for community stakeholders to voice concerns about TRAP as part of a new framework focused on health and wellness. Concerns about pedestrian safety, housing access, and expansion of green and recreational spaces were highlighted by participants as important areas for further development.

Conclusions: Boston Chinatown residents reaffirmed their investment in the community by highlighting concerns about TRAP within the context of other health-related concerns. Charrettes offer a vehicle to advance environmental justice in communities through collective problem-solving and decision making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 Charrette 促进社区环境正义:波士顿唐人街案例研究》。
背景:波士顿唐人街的社区研究合作伙伴开展了一次规划研讨会,作为基于社区的参与式研究的一部分,该研究侧重于近郊公路研究和公共卫生行动,以减轻与交通相关的空气污染(TRAP)。研讨会是以解决方案为导向的设计和规划的密集研讨会,用于汇集不同的利益相关者,以解决复杂的环境健康问题:规划研讨会包括三个阶段:(1) 社区会议和居民访谈;(2) 规划研讨会,在更大的社区健康目标范围内解决社区健康问题和空气污染问题;(3) 制定总体规划文件,包括政策、项目和实践建议,以指导未来的社区宣传活动:跨代居民、社区领袖、规划师、研究人员和志愿者(90 人)参加了为期一天的规划研讨会,为中国城总体规划提供信息。居民访谈为研讨会提供了信息,重点是为居民确定的三个优先事项寻找解决方案:健康住房、健康交通和健康公共场所。围绕每个优先领域的讨论都包含了空气污染缓解策略:此次研讨会为社区利益相关者提供了一个机会,让他们表达对 TRAP 的担忧,并将其作为以健康和保健为重点的新框架的一部分。与会者强调,行人安全、住房使用权以及绿色和休闲空间的扩展是需要进一步发展的重要领域:波士顿唐人街居民重申了他们对社区的投资,在其他健康相关问题的背景下强调了对 TRAP 的关注。研讨会为通过集体解决问题和决策来促进社区环境正义提供了一个工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Environmental Justice, a quarterly peer-reviewed journal, is the central forum for the research, debate, and discussion of the equitable treatment and involvement of all people, especially minority and low-income populations, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. The Journal explores the adverse and disparate environmental burden impacting marginalized populations and communities all over the world. Environmental Justice draws upon the expertise and perspectives of all parties involved in environmental justice struggles: communities, industry, academia, government, and nonprofit organizations.
期刊最新文献
Empowering Citizens Through the Development and Deployment of a Community-Based Environmental Health Reporting Tool Electronic Monitoring Policy at Sea Beyond “Human Bycatch” The Lack of Real-Time Air Pollution Monitoring in Africa Supports Environmental Injustice What a Difference a Datum Makes: Revisiting the Impacts of Cap-and-Trade on Emissions and Environmental Justice Mixed Methods Approaches: Structures and Methodologies for Cumulative Impact Assessment Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1