The attentional boost effect reflects both enhanced memory for target-paired objects and impaired memory for distractor-paired objects.

IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1037/xlm0001320
Caitlin A Sisk, Vanessa G Lee
{"title":"The attentional boost effect reflects both enhanced memory for target-paired objects and impaired memory for distractor-paired objects.","authors":"Caitlin A Sisk, Vanessa G Lee","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Throughout prolonged tasks, visual attention fluctuates temporally in response to the present stimuli, task demands, and changes in available attentional resources. This temporal fluctuation has downstream effects on memory for stimuli presented during the task. Researchers have established that detection of a target (e.g., a square of a color to which participants are instructed to respond with a button press) within a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream leads to better memory for concurrently presented stimuli than for stimuli presented along with an RSVP distractor (e.g., a square of a color to which participants are instructed to withhold response). Although debates have arisen regarding whether this memory difference, termed the attentional boost effect, results from target-induced enhancement, distractor-induced impairment, or a combination of the two, researchers have largely come to focus on explanations that consider only target-induced memory enhancement. In the present study, we show across three large-sampled experiments a consistent appearance of both target-induced memory enhancement and distractor-induced memory impairment relative to a baseline. In each experiment, participants responded with a spacebar press to squares of one color in an RSVP stream while withholding response to squares of another color and trials with no square (baseline trials). They simultaneously memorized concurrently presented objects. The presence of both enhancement and impairment in these experiments invites the development of new dual-task research that considers distractor-induced memory impairment and the control of temporal selection across tasks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11180455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001320","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Throughout prolonged tasks, visual attention fluctuates temporally in response to the present stimuli, task demands, and changes in available attentional resources. This temporal fluctuation has downstream effects on memory for stimuli presented during the task. Researchers have established that detection of a target (e.g., a square of a color to which participants are instructed to respond with a button press) within a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream leads to better memory for concurrently presented stimuli than for stimuli presented along with an RSVP distractor (e.g., a square of a color to which participants are instructed to withhold response). Although debates have arisen regarding whether this memory difference, termed the attentional boost effect, results from target-induced enhancement, distractor-induced impairment, or a combination of the two, researchers have largely come to focus on explanations that consider only target-induced memory enhancement. In the present study, we show across three large-sampled experiments a consistent appearance of both target-induced memory enhancement and distractor-induced memory impairment relative to a baseline. In each experiment, participants responded with a spacebar press to squares of one color in an RSVP stream while withholding response to squares of another color and trials with no square (baseline trials). They simultaneously memorized concurrently presented objects. The presence of both enhancement and impairment in these experiments invites the development of new dual-task research that considers distractor-induced memory impairment and the control of temporal selection across tasks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注意增强效应既反映了对目标配对对象记忆的增强,也反映了对分心配对对象记忆的减弱。
在长时间的任务中,视觉注意力会随着当前刺激、任务要求和可用注意力资源的变化而发生时间波动。这种时间波动会对任务期间出现的刺激的记忆产生下游影响。研究人员已经证实,在快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)流中检测到目标(例如,一个正方形的颜色,参与者被指示按下按钮做出反应),对同时呈现的刺激物的记忆效果要好于对与 RSVP 同时呈现的干扰物(例如,一个正方形的颜色,参与者被指示不做出反应)一起呈现的刺激物的记忆效果。这种记忆差异被称为 "注意增强效应"(attentional boost effect),它是由目标诱发的记忆增强、由分心物诱发的记忆减弱还是两者的结合所导致的,尽管如此,研究者们还是将注意力主要集中在只考虑目标诱发的记忆增强的解释上。在本研究中,我们在三个大样本实验中发现,相对于基线,目标诱发的记忆增强和分心物诱发的记忆损伤表现一致。在每个实验中,参与者按下空格键对 RSVP 数据流中一种颜色的方块做出反应,同时对另一种颜色的方块和没有方块的试验(基线试验)不做反应。他们同时记忆同时出现的物体。这些实验中同时出现了记忆增强和记忆受损的现象,这就需要开展新的双任务研究,考虑分心物引起的记忆受损和跨任务的时间选择控制。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Direct and indirect effects of fluid intelligence on the retrieval practice effect. Delayed testing in directed forgetting dissociates active and passive forms of forgetting. Judgments of learning (JOLs) impact item memory but not source memory: Insights into JOL reactivity using a multinomial model. Mapping the reliability multiverse of contextual cuing. Modulations of response activation contribute to block-wide control: Evidence from proportion congruency effects in the prime-probe task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1