Hongli Yang PhD, Jack P. Rees BA, Facundo G. Sanchez MD, Stuart K. Gardiner PhD, Steven L. Mansberger MD, MPH
{"title":"OCT Segmentation Errors with Bruch's Membrane Opening-Minimum Rim Width as Compared with Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness","authors":"Hongli Yang PhD, Jack P. Rees BA, Facundo G. Sanchez MD, Stuart K. Gardiner PhD, Steven L. Mansberger MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the magnitude and location of automated segmentation errors of the Bruch’s membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>We included 162 glaucoma suspect or open-angle glaucoma eyes from 162 participants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used spectral-domain optic coherence tomography (Spectralis 870 nm, Heidelberg Engineering) to image the optic nerve with 24 radial optic nerve head B-scans and a 12-degree peripapillary circle scan, and exported the native “automated segmentation only” results for BMO-MRW and RNFLT. We also exported the results after “manual refinement” of the measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>We calculated the absolute and proportional error globally and within the 12 30-degree sectors of the optic disc. We determined whether the glaucoma classifications were different between BMO-MRW and RNFLT as a result of manual and automatic segmentation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The absolute error mean was larger for BMO-MRW than for RNFLT (10.8 μm vs. 3.58 μm, <em>P</em> < 0.001). However, the proportional errors were similar (4.3% vs. 4.4%, <em>P</em> = 0.47). In a multivariable regression model, errors in BMO-MRW were not significantly associated with age, location, magnitude, or severity of glaucoma loss (all <em>P</em> ≥ 0.05). However, larger RNFLT errors were associated with the superior and inferior sector location, thicker nerve fiber layer, and worse visual field (all <em>P</em> < 0.05). Errors in BMO-MRW and RNFLT were not likely to occur in the same sector location (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.001; <em>P</em> = 0.15). With manual refinement, the glaucoma classification changed in 7.8% and 6.2% of eyes with BMO-MRW and RNFLT, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both BMO-MRW and RNFLT measurements included segmentation errors, which did not seem to have a common location, and may result in differences in glaucoma classification.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":"7 3","pages":"Pages 308-315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419623002260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To compare the magnitude and location of automated segmentation errors of the Bruch’s membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT).
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Participants
We included 162 glaucoma suspect or open-angle glaucoma eyes from 162 participants.
Methods
We used spectral-domain optic coherence tomography (Spectralis 870 nm, Heidelberg Engineering) to image the optic nerve with 24 radial optic nerve head B-scans and a 12-degree peripapillary circle scan, and exported the native “automated segmentation only” results for BMO-MRW and RNFLT. We also exported the results after “manual refinement” of the measurements.
Main Outcome Measures
We calculated the absolute and proportional error globally and within the 12 30-degree sectors of the optic disc. We determined whether the glaucoma classifications were different between BMO-MRW and RNFLT as a result of manual and automatic segmentation.
Results
The absolute error mean was larger for BMO-MRW than for RNFLT (10.8 μm vs. 3.58 μm, P < 0.001). However, the proportional errors were similar (4.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.47). In a multivariable regression model, errors in BMO-MRW were not significantly associated with age, location, magnitude, or severity of glaucoma loss (all P ≥ 0.05). However, larger RNFLT errors were associated with the superior and inferior sector location, thicker nerve fiber layer, and worse visual field (all P < 0.05). Errors in BMO-MRW and RNFLT were not likely to occur in the same sector location (R2 = 0.001; P = 0.15). With manual refinement, the glaucoma classification changed in 7.8% and 6.2% of eyes with BMO-MRW and RNFLT, respectively.
Conclusions
Both BMO-MRW and RNFLT measurements included segmentation errors, which did not seem to have a common location, and may result in differences in glaucoma classification.
Financial Disclosure(s)
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.