Examining the structure of personality dysfunction.

Personality disorders Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1037/per0000648
Chelsea E Sleep, Nathaniel L Phillips, Tianwei V Du, Colin Vize, Donald R Lynam, Joshua D Miller
{"title":"Examining the structure of personality dysfunction.","authors":"Chelsea E Sleep, Nathaniel L Phillips, Tianwei V Du, Colin Vize, Donald R Lynam, Joshua D Miller","doi":"10.1037/per0000648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personality impairment is a core feature of personality disorders in both current (i.e., <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition [<i>DSM-5</i>] personality disorders, International <i>Classification of Diseases</i>,11th revision personality disorders) and emerging (i.e., <i>DSM-5'</i>s alternative model of personality disorders) models of psychopathology. Yet, despite its importance within clinical nosology, attempts to identify its optimal lower-order structure have yielded inconsistent findings. Given its presence in diagnostic models, it is important to better understand its empirical structure across a variety of instantiations. To the degree that impairment is multifaceted, various factors may have different nomological networks and varied implications for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. Therefore, participants were recruited from two large public universities in the present preregistered study (<i>N</i> = 574) to explore the construct's structure with exploratory \"bass-ackward\" factor analyses at the item level. Participants completed over 250 items from six commonly used measures of personality dysfunction. Criterion variables in its nomological network were also collected (e.g., general and pathological personality traits, internalizing/externalizing behavior, and personality disorders) using both self- and informant-reports. These factor analyses identified four lower-order facets of impairment (i.e., negative self-regard, disagreeableness, intimacy problems, and lack of direction), all of which showed moderate to strong overlap with traits from both general and pathological models of personality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"110-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personality impairment is a core feature of personality disorders in both current (i.e., Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition [DSM-5] personality disorders, International Classification of Diseases,11th revision personality disorders) and emerging (i.e., DSM-5's alternative model of personality disorders) models of psychopathology. Yet, despite its importance within clinical nosology, attempts to identify its optimal lower-order structure have yielded inconsistent findings. Given its presence in diagnostic models, it is important to better understand its empirical structure across a variety of instantiations. To the degree that impairment is multifaceted, various factors may have different nomological networks and varied implications for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. Therefore, participants were recruited from two large public universities in the present preregistered study (N = 574) to explore the construct's structure with exploratory "bass-ackward" factor analyses at the item level. Participants completed over 250 items from six commonly used measures of personality dysfunction. Criterion variables in its nomological network were also collected (e.g., general and pathological personality traits, internalizing/externalizing behavior, and personality disorders) using both self- and informant-reports. These factor analyses identified four lower-order facets of impairment (i.e., negative self-regard, disagreeableness, intimacy problems, and lack of direction), all of which showed moderate to strong overlap with traits from both general and pathological models of personality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究人格功能障碍的结构。
在当前(即《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版[DSM-5]人格障碍、《国际疾病分类》第 11 版人格障碍)和新出现(即 DSM-5 的人格障碍替代模型)的精神病理学模型中,人格障碍都是人格障碍的核心特征。然而,尽管它在临床命名学中非常重要,但试图确定其最佳低阶结构的研究结果却并不一致。鉴于其在诊断模型中的存在,我们有必要更好地了解其在各种实例中的经验结构。由于障碍是多方面的,各种因素可能具有不同的名义网络,并对评估、诊断和治疗产生不同的影响。因此,本研究从两所大型公立大学中招募了参与者(N = 574),通过探索性的 "后向 "因子分析,在项目层面上探索障碍的结构。参与者完成了六种常用人格功能障碍测量中的 250 多个项目。此外,还通过自我报告和线人报告的方式收集了其命名网络中的标准变量(如一般人格和病态人格特征、内化/外化行为和人格障碍)。这些因子分析确定了四个低阶的损伤面(即消极自律、不合群、亲密关系问题和缺乏方向感),所有这些都与一般人格和病态人格模型中的特征有中度到高度的重叠。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An exploratory study on disinhibition and interpersonal outcomes in daily life. The association between minority stressors, intraminority stressors, and borderline personality disorder symptomatology among sexual minority men. Advancing understanding of the relation between criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders and hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology: Insights from an external validity analysis. Negative affect and pain catastrophizing link borderline personality disorder to pain: Replicating and extending the borderline personality disorder-pain association. First psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 in adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1