Are acromiohumeral distance measurements on conventional radiographs reliable? A prospective study of inter-method agreement with ultrasonography, and assessment of observer variability.

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Joint diseases and related surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-31 DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2023.1288
Goker Utku Deger, Cumhur Deniz Davulcu, Bedri Karaismailoglu, Deniz Palamar, Mehmet Fatih Guven
{"title":"Are acromiohumeral distance measurements on conventional radiographs reliable? A prospective study of inter-method agreement with ultrasonography, and assessment of observer variability.","authors":"Goker Utku Deger, Cumhur Deniz Davulcu, Bedri Karaismailoglu, Deniz Palamar, Mehmet Fatih Guven","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2023.1288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the reliability of acromiohumeral distance (AHD) measurements using conventional radiographs and to compare non-standardized and standardized radiographs with intra-/interobserver reliability measurements.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between February 2021 and January 2022, a total of 110 shoulders of 55 patients (25 males, 30 females; mean age: 49.7±12.6 years; range, 25 to 77 years) were included. Radiographs were taken in four different positions: primarily shoulder anteroposterior (AP), true AP, standardized true AP, and standardized outlet views. The AHD was measured by three orthopedists. A prospective ultrasonography (US) evaluation was performed by an experienced physiatrist, and the relationship between US and radiographic measurements was evaluated. The intra- and interobserver reliability of radiographic measurements was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the standardized true AP view measurements, all observers showed a moderate to good agreement with US measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC]: 0.68-0.75). There was no significant difference between the AHD measurements of the senior orthopedist on standardized true AP and outlet views, and the US measurements. The intraobserver agreement of US measurements was excellent (ICC: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-0.99), and the intraobserver agreement level of measurements on radiographs were good to excellent with a wide range of ICC values (ICC: 0.79-0.97). Interobserver reliability was the highest on the standardized outlet view, with an ICC of 0.91 and 0.88 in two measurement times. Interobserver reliability of other measurements were good with ICC values ranging from 0.82 to 0.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AHD measurements on radiographs are compatible with US measurements within up to 2 mm difference if standardization is ensured. Also, measurements on standardized views have a superior consistency with lower standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change values. Therefore, we recommend using standardized true shoulder AP and standardized outlet radiographs in clinical practice and studies, as these are the most accurate in demonstrating true AHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"35 1","pages":"62-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10746906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the reliability of acromiohumeral distance (AHD) measurements using conventional radiographs and to compare non-standardized and standardized radiographs with intra-/interobserver reliability measurements.

Patients and methods: Between February 2021 and January 2022, a total of 110 shoulders of 55 patients (25 males, 30 females; mean age: 49.7±12.6 years; range, 25 to 77 years) were included. Radiographs were taken in four different positions: primarily shoulder anteroposterior (AP), true AP, standardized true AP, and standardized outlet views. The AHD was measured by three orthopedists. A prospective ultrasonography (US) evaluation was performed by an experienced physiatrist, and the relationship between US and radiographic measurements was evaluated. The intra- and interobserver reliability of radiographic measurements was assessed.

Results: On the standardized true AP view measurements, all observers showed a moderate to good agreement with US measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC]: 0.68-0.75). There was no significant difference between the AHD measurements of the senior orthopedist on standardized true AP and outlet views, and the US measurements. The intraobserver agreement of US measurements was excellent (ICC: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-0.99), and the intraobserver agreement level of measurements on radiographs were good to excellent with a wide range of ICC values (ICC: 0.79-0.97). Interobserver reliability was the highest on the standardized outlet view, with an ICC of 0.91 and 0.88 in two measurement times. Interobserver reliability of other measurements were good with ICC values ranging from 0.82 to 0.88.

Conclusion: The AHD measurements on radiographs are compatible with US measurements within up to 2 mm difference if standardization is ensured. Also, measurements on standardized views have a superior consistency with lower standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change values. Therefore, we recommend using standardized true shoulder AP and standardized outlet radiographs in clinical practice and studies, as these are the most accurate in demonstrating true AHD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统X光片上的肱骨肩峰距离测量可靠吗?一项前瞻性研究:超声波造影与其他方法之间的一致性,以及对观察者变异性的评估。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨使用常规X光片测量肱骨肩峰距离(AHD)的可靠性,并比较非标准化和标准化X光片的观察者内/观察者间可靠性测量:2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 1 月期间,共纳入 55 名患者(25 名男性,30 名女性;平均年龄:49.7±12.6 岁;范围:25 岁至 77 岁)的 110 个肩部。在四个不同的位置拍摄了X光片:主要是肩关节前后位(AP)、真AP、标准化真AP和标准化出口视图。AHD由三位骨科医生测量。一位经验丰富的物理治疗师进行了前瞻性超声波(US)评估,并对 US 和射线测量之间的关系进行了评估。评估了放射学测量在观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性:结果:在标准化真实 AP 切面测量中,所有观察者的测量结果均与 US 测量结果显示出中等至良好的一致性(类内相关系数 [ICC]:0.68-0.75)。资深骨科医生对标准化真实 AP 切面和出口切面的 AHD 测量结果与 US 测量结果之间没有明显差异。US测量的观察者内一致性极佳(ICC:0.98,95%置信区间[CI]:0.98-0.99),X光片测量的观察者内一致性水平良好至极佳,ICC值范围较广(ICC:0.79-0.97)。标准化出口视图的观察者间可靠性最高,两次测量的 ICC 值分别为 0.91 和 0.88。其他测量的观察者间可靠性良好,ICC值在0.82至0.88之间:结论:如果确保标准化,X 光片上的 AHD 测量值与 US 测量值是一致的,最多相差 2 毫米。此外,标准化切面的测量结果具有更高的一致性,测量标准误差更低,可检测到的变化值也最小。因此,我们建议在临床实践和研究中使用标准化的真实肩关节AP和标准化的出路X光片,因为它们能最准确地显示真实的AHD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Arteriovenous fistula and pseudoaneurysm in a pediatric patient with persistent postoperative hemarthrosis: A rare complication following arthroscopic repair of a bucket handle medial meniscal tear. Clinical results of knee juxta-articular giant-cell tumors treated with bone cement filling and internal fixation after extensive curettage. Effect of supplementation with type 1 and type 3 collagen peptide and type 2 hydrolyzed collagen on osteoarthritis-related pain, quality of life, and physical function: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Does the use of robotic technology in knee arthroplasty provide superior clinical outcomes? Effect of posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining implants on three-dimensional kinematic characteristics after total knee arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1