Clinical studies in Ayurveda: A bibliometric analysis of articles indexed in AYUSH research portal.

Ayu Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-09 DOI:10.4103/ayu.ayu_144_21
Saketh Ram Thrigulla, V Sridevi, B Vamshi Krishna, M Karthik Naik, K Rudrama Devi, G Shruthi, Arunabh Tripathi, G P Prasad, P V V Prasad, V K Lavaniya, N Srikant
{"title":"Clinical studies in Ayurveda: A bibliometric analysis of articles indexed in AYUSH research portal.","authors":"Saketh Ram Thrigulla, V Sridevi, B Vamshi Krishna, M Karthik Naik, K Rudrama Devi, G Shruthi, Arunabh Tripathi, G P Prasad, P V V Prasad, V K Lavaniya, N Srikant","doi":"10.4103/ayu.ayu_144_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bibliometric analysis is a standard method for evaluating the quality and quantity of published articles. AYUSH research portal (ARP) is meant for the dissemination of research findings in the domains of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, Sowa-rigpa, and Homoeopathy and allied faculties. The study attempts to understand the trend of published Ayurveda clinical trial-based articles in terms of quality and quantity. Three perspectives of research output assessed in this study are productivity in the field of Ayurveda, evidence from articles, and its involvement with the body system where disease or malfunctions are induced. Based on the study, it is observed that the highest number of articles have been published under the musculoskeletal, endocrine/metabolic/nutritional categories, and skin. Further, it is observed that only 4.50% of articles are categorized under the evidence of Grade \"A\" (randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) as per the World Health Organization's traditional medicine research guidelines. Out of the top 20 journals which publish Ayurveda-based research works, only five journals are indexed in reputed indexing platforms viz., PubMed and Scopus. The findings indicate that, Ayurveda clinical trials have to be planned meticulously and carried out as per the RCT guidelines for producing quality evidence so that the abysmal percentage of grade-A category articles will increase in ARP. Further, the journals, which are not yet indexed in standard indexing platforms, must strive to secure a place in them to ensure access to appropriate peers and effective dissemination of findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":502094,"journal":{"name":"Ayu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10710232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ayu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ayu.ayu_144_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis is a standard method for evaluating the quality and quantity of published articles. AYUSH research portal (ARP) is meant for the dissemination of research findings in the domains of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, Sowa-rigpa, and Homoeopathy and allied faculties. The study attempts to understand the trend of published Ayurveda clinical trial-based articles in terms of quality and quantity. Three perspectives of research output assessed in this study are productivity in the field of Ayurveda, evidence from articles, and its involvement with the body system where disease or malfunctions are induced. Based on the study, it is observed that the highest number of articles have been published under the musculoskeletal, endocrine/metabolic/nutritional categories, and skin. Further, it is observed that only 4.50% of articles are categorized under the evidence of Grade "A" (randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) as per the World Health Organization's traditional medicine research guidelines. Out of the top 20 journals which publish Ayurveda-based research works, only five journals are indexed in reputed indexing platforms viz., PubMed and Scopus. The findings indicate that, Ayurveda clinical trials have to be planned meticulously and carried out as per the RCT guidelines for producing quality evidence so that the abysmal percentage of grade-A category articles will increase in ARP. Further, the journals, which are not yet indexed in standard indexing platforms, must strive to secure a place in them to ensure access to appropriate peers and effective dissemination of findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿育吠陀的临床研究:阿育吠陀研究门户网站收录文章的文献计量分析。
文献计量分析是评估已发表文章质量和数量的标准方法。阿育吠陀研究门户网站(ARP)旨在传播阿育吠陀、瑜伽和自然疗法、尤那尼、悉达、索瓦-里格帕、同种疗法及相关学科领域的研究成果。本研究试图从质量和数量两方面了解已发表的阿育吠陀临床试验文章的趋势。本研究从三个角度评估了研究成果,即阿育吠陀领域的生产力、文章中的证据及其与诱发疾病或功能障碍的身体系统的关系。研究发现,在肌肉骨骼、内分泌/代谢/营养和皮肤类别下发表的文章数量最多。此外,根据世界卫生组织的传统医学研究指南,只有 4.50%的文章被归类为 "A "级证据(随机对照试验 [RCT])。在发表阿育吠陀研究成果的前 20 种期刊中,只有 5 种期刊被知名索引平台(即 PubMed 和 Scopus)收录。研究结果表明,阿育吠陀临床试验必须按照 RCT 指南进行精心策划和实施,以提供高质量的证据,从而提高 ARP 中 A 级文章的比例。此外,尚未被标准索引平台收录的期刊必须努力争取在这些平台上占有一席之地,以确保适当的同行可以查阅,并有效传播研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ayu
Ayu
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of COROPROTECT kit as an add-on therapy in the management of mild-to-moderate COVID-19: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Use of checkerboard assay to determine the synergy between essential oils extracted from leaves of Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa and nystatin against Candida albicans. Comparative Pharmacognostic study of market samples of Tagara collected from five different markets of Kerala with the official source plant Valeriana jatamansi Jones ex Roxb. Erratum: Balchaturbhadra Churna as a potential medicine for SARS-CoV2 infection in pediatric setting an in silico study. Evaluation of the anti-arthritic activity of Rhuflex-F - A proprietary Ayurvedic herbomineral formulation in albino rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1