Multi-professional screening instrument for risk of broncho-aspiration in a hospital environment for the elderly population: validity evidence based on response processes.

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY CoDAS Pub Date : 2023-12-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20232022228pt
Paloma Alves Miquilussi, Rosane Sampaio Santos, Giselle Aparecida de Athayde Massi
{"title":"Multi-professional screening instrument for risk of broncho-aspiration in a hospital environment for the elderly population: validity evidence based on response processes.","authors":"Paloma Alves Miquilussi, Rosane Sampaio Santos, Giselle Aparecida de Athayde Massi","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232022228pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to validate the Multiprofessional Screening Instrument for Broncho-aspiration Risk in Hospital Environment, which is aimed at the elderly population, based on response processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Judges applied the instrument to different patients and randomly selected. After the application, the judges were interviewed so that it was possible to verify their impression regarding the relevance of the items about their interpretation of the written content, as well as grammatical and semantic issues. Suggestions for adding alternative questions and answers were considered, as well as proposals for adapting the questions that made up the instrument. Non-verbal reactions, such as facial expressions that suggested doubts or hesitations, by the judges concerning the instrument were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement of the judges concerning each item of the device was calculated by the Content Validity Index (CVI) and by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and their results showed a high level of agreement. Through the suggestions of the judges, a new version of the Multi-professional Screening Instrument for the Risk of Broncho-aspiration in a Hospital Environment in the Elderly was elaborated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results obtained showed that the validity of the Multi-professional Instrument for Screening the Risk of Broncho-aspiration in the Hospital Environment with the elderly population, based on the response processes, was achieved and makes it a promising device to assist professionals in hospital care for the elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10750859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022228pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to validate the Multiprofessional Screening Instrument for Broncho-aspiration Risk in Hospital Environment, which is aimed at the elderly population, based on response processes.

Methods: Judges applied the instrument to different patients and randomly selected. After the application, the judges were interviewed so that it was possible to verify their impression regarding the relevance of the items about their interpretation of the written content, as well as grammatical and semantic issues. Suggestions for adding alternative questions and answers were considered, as well as proposals for adapting the questions that made up the instrument. Non-verbal reactions, such as facial expressions that suggested doubts or hesitations, by the judges concerning the instrument were also analyzed.

Results: The agreement of the judges concerning each item of the device was calculated by the Content Validity Index (CVI) and by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and their results showed a high level of agreement. Through the suggestions of the judges, a new version of the Multi-professional Screening Instrument for the Risk of Broncho-aspiration in a Hospital Environment in the Elderly was elaborated.

Conclusion: The results obtained showed that the validity of the Multi-professional Instrument for Screening the Risk of Broncho-aspiration in the Hospital Environment with the elderly population, based on the response processes, was achieved and makes it a promising device to assist professionals in hospital care for the elderly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院环境中老年人支气管吸入风险的多专业筛查工具:基于反应过程的有效性证据。
目的:本研究旨在根据反应过程验证针对老年人群的医院环境中支气管吸入风险的多专业筛查工具:方法:对不同的患者随机抽取评委使用该工具。使用后,对评委进行了访谈,以核实他们对书面内容的解释以及语法和语义问题的相关性的印象。此外,还考虑了增加其他问题和答案的建议,以及调整构成工具的问题的建议。此外,还分析了评委对问卷的非语言反应,如表示怀疑或犹豫的面部表情:通过内容效度指数(CVI)和类内相关系数(ICC)计算了评委们对工具中每个项目的一致程度,结果显示一致程度很高。通过评委们的建议,新版《医院环境中老年人支气管吸入风险多专业筛查工具》得以制定:结果表明,《医院环境中老年人支气管吸入风险多专业筛查工具》在反应过程的基础上实现了有效性,使其成为协助医院护理老年人的专业人员的一种有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of Competing Sentence Test in Kannada. Activity ordering task: conceptualization and development of a novel context-based working memory task with a metacognitive facet. Development of a Comprehensive Cough Therapy Program (CCTP) for chronic cough in India: a qualitative study. Speech perception in the Specific Learning Disorder with and without Persistent Speech Sound Disorder. Analysis of brain activity for speech stimuli and child development of an infant with neurosyphilis: case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1