Pain Management during Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement (NexoBrid®) in a USA Adult Burn Center

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE European burn journal Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.3390/ebj5010001
Martin R. Buta, Domenic Annand, Sarah Findeisen, Sean A. Hickey, Robert L. Sheridan, Jonathan S. Friedstat, John T. Schulz, Branko Bojovic, Edward A. Bittner, Jeremy Goverman
{"title":"Pain Management during Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement (NexoBrid®) in a USA Adult Burn Center","authors":"Martin R. Buta, Domenic Annand, Sarah Findeisen, Sean A. Hickey, Robert L. Sheridan, Jonathan S. Friedstat, John T. Schulz, Branko Bojovic, Edward A. Bittner, Jeremy Goverman","doi":"10.3390/ebj5010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Outside the United States, bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BBED) has become an effective tool for the removal of burn eschar. A primary concern with BBED is that it is a painful procedure requiring appropriate analgesia. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience using NexoBrid® (NXB), with a particular focus on pain management. We performed a retrospective review on all 32 adult burn patients enrolled at our institution as part of a multicenter phase 3 clinical trial (DETECT) or the expanded access treatment protocol (NEXT). All patients underwent BBED with NXB of acute deep partial- and full-thickness thermal burn wounds at a major burn center between November 2016 and February 2023. Thirty-two patients with an average age of 42.1 years (SD = 17.4, range 18–72) and an average TBSA of 6.3% (SD = 5.9, range 1–24.5) underwent a total of 33 BBED procedures. Only one patient required an additional NXB treatment, and all patients achieved >95% eschar removal. For pain control during debridement, seven patients required a local block (LB), nine a regional block (RB), and thirteen conscious sedation (CS). Three patients were intubated (INTB) for their burn injury prior to the procedure. There was no statistical difference in Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores during vs. before treatment or after vs. before treatment for all patients or when subdivided by BMI, race, TBSA, total area treated, and anesthetic type (LB, RB, and CS). With appropriate analgesia, the pain associated with BBED of acute deep partial- and full-thickness thermal burns is well tolerated.","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"117 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj5010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Outside the United States, bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BBED) has become an effective tool for the removal of burn eschar. A primary concern with BBED is that it is a painful procedure requiring appropriate analgesia. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience using NexoBrid® (NXB), with a particular focus on pain management. We performed a retrospective review on all 32 adult burn patients enrolled at our institution as part of a multicenter phase 3 clinical trial (DETECT) or the expanded access treatment protocol (NEXT). All patients underwent BBED with NXB of acute deep partial- and full-thickness thermal burn wounds at a major burn center between November 2016 and February 2023. Thirty-two patients with an average age of 42.1 years (SD = 17.4, range 18–72) and an average TBSA of 6.3% (SD = 5.9, range 1–24.5) underwent a total of 33 BBED procedures. Only one patient required an additional NXB treatment, and all patients achieved >95% eschar removal. For pain control during debridement, seven patients required a local block (LB), nine a regional block (RB), and thirteen conscious sedation (CS). Three patients were intubated (INTB) for their burn injury prior to the procedure. There was no statistical difference in Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores during vs. before treatment or after vs. before treatment for all patients or when subdivided by BMI, race, TBSA, total area treated, and anesthetic type (LB, RB, and CS). With appropriate analgesia, the pain associated with BBED of acute deep partial- and full-thickness thermal burns is well tolerated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国一家成人烧伤中心在菠萝蛋白酶酶解清创术(NexoBrid®)期间的疼痛管理
在美国之外,基于菠萝蛋白酶的清创疗法(BBED)已成为清除烧伤焦痂的有效工具。BBED 的一个主要问题是手术过程疼痛,需要适当的镇痛。本研究的目的是介绍我们使用 NexoBrid® (NXB) 的经验,尤其关注疼痛管理。我们对本机构作为多中心三期临床试验(DETECT)或扩大治疗方案(NEXT)一部分入组的所有 32 名成年烧伤患者进行了回顾性审查。所有患者均于 2016 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月期间在一家大型烧伤中心接受了急性深部部分和全层热烧伤创面的 BBED 和 NXB 治疗。32 名患者的平均年龄为 42.1 岁(SD = 17.4,范围为 18-72),平均 TBSA 为 6.3%(SD = 5.9,范围为 1-24.5),共接受了 33 次 BBED 治疗。只有一名患者需要额外的 NXB 治疗,所有患者的焦痂去除率均大于 95%。清创过程中的疼痛控制,七名患者需要局部阻滞(LB),九名患者需要区域阻滞(RB),十三名患者需要意识镇静(CS)。三名患者在手术前因烧伤进行了插管(INTB)治疗。所有患者在治疗过程中与治疗前、治疗后与治疗前的数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)得分没有统计学差异,按体重指数(BMI)、种族、总热损伤面积(TBSA)、治疗总面积和麻醉类型(LB、RB 和 CS)细分时也是如此。在适当镇痛的情况下,急性深部部分和全层热烧伤 BBED 所带来的疼痛可以很好地忍受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis and Treatment of Infections in the Burn Patient. High-Voltage Electrical Burn Requiring Urgent Scalp Reconstruction after Developing a Brain Abscess. Introduction to the Special Issue on Wars and Disasters: Advancing Care during Times of Crisis. The Successful Treatment of Multi-Resistant Colonized Burns with Large-Area Atmospheric Cold Plasma Therapy and Dermis Substitute Matrix-A Case Report. Sustainable Primary Cell Banking for Topical Compound Cytotoxicity Assays: Protocol Validation on Novel Biocides and Antifungals for Optimized Burn Wound Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1