Performance of Primary Health Centres, Provider’s Perspective of Wellbeing, and Patient’s Assessment of the Centres Using a New Tool in Bangalore, India: An empirical study

IF 0.6 Q4 Health Professions Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2223
Rajeshwari Bangalore Sathyananda, A. D. de Rijk, U. Manjunath, Anja Krumeich, Onno Van Schayck,
{"title":"Performance of Primary Health Centres, Provider’s Perspective of Wellbeing, and Patient’s Assessment of the Centres Using a New Tool in Bangalore, India: An empirical study","authors":"Rajeshwari Bangalore Sathyananda, A. D. de Rijk, U. Manjunath, Anja Krumeich, Onno Van Schayck,","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Primary healthcare in India comprises health promotion and preventive health interventions at the population level, which are rendered at dedicated centres called Primary Healthcare Centres (PHCs). The performance of PHCs is vital for overall improvement in the general health of the population, specifically in a low- and middle-income country like India. It is unknown how performance at the centre level is related to performance at the provider and patient levels. The aim of this study is to explore patterns in the performance of three PHCs with a low, medium and the high number of babies delivered. \nMethodology: Primary and secondary data from the three selected PHCs were collected. Two questionnaire studies were done: one on the well-being of providers (Quality of Life and Engagement), and another on PHC performance as assessed by patients using the newly developed tool ‘Questionnaire for Patient’s Perspective on Performance of Primary Healthcare Centres’. The data from the centre, provider and patient levels were compared across the three centres using ANOVA tests. \nResults: The new tool had high internal consistency at Cronbach’s alpha score of 0.938. It was found that the PHC with the least delivery had significantly higher PHC performance in comparison with high and medium-delivery PHCs (p<0.000). \nConclusion: The PHC performance assessment from multiple perspectives offers a realistic insight into the centres, which is valid even though agreement on the various perspectives could not be obtained. The new Q4PHC is a reliable instrument to assess PHC performance from the patient’s perspective.","PeriodicalId":42935,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":"43 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary healthcare in India comprises health promotion and preventive health interventions at the population level, which are rendered at dedicated centres called Primary Healthcare Centres (PHCs). The performance of PHCs is vital for overall improvement in the general health of the population, specifically in a low- and middle-income country like India. It is unknown how performance at the centre level is related to performance at the provider and patient levels. The aim of this study is to explore patterns in the performance of three PHCs with a low, medium and the high number of babies delivered. Methodology: Primary and secondary data from the three selected PHCs were collected. Two questionnaire studies were done: one on the well-being of providers (Quality of Life and Engagement), and another on PHC performance as assessed by patients using the newly developed tool ‘Questionnaire for Patient’s Perspective on Performance of Primary Healthcare Centres’. The data from the centre, provider and patient levels were compared across the three centres using ANOVA tests. Results: The new tool had high internal consistency at Cronbach’s alpha score of 0.938. It was found that the PHC with the least delivery had significantly higher PHC performance in comparison with high and medium-delivery PHCs (p<0.000). Conclusion: The PHC performance assessment from multiple perspectives offers a realistic insight into the centres, which is valid even though agreement on the various perspectives could not be obtained. The new Q4PHC is a reliable instrument to assess PHC performance from the patient’s perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度班加罗尔初级保健中心的绩效、服务提供者对健康的看法以及患者使用新工具对中心的评价:实证研究
背景:印度的初级医疗保健包括在人口层面开展的健康促进和预防保健干预活动,这些活动在被称为初级医疗保健中心(PHC)的专门中心进行。初级保健中心的绩效对于全面改善人口的总体健康状况至关重要,尤其是在印度这样的中低收入国家。目前尚不清楚中心层面的绩效与医疗服务提供者和患者层面的绩效之间的关系。本研究的目的是探索婴儿接生数量较少、中等和较多的三家初级保健中心的绩效模式。研究方法:从选定的三家初级保健中心收集第一手和第二手数据。进行了两项问卷调查研究:一项是关于医疗服务提供者的福利(生活质量和参与),另一项是使用新开发的工具 "病人对初级保健中心绩效的看法问卷",由病人对初级保健中心的绩效进行评估。通过方差分析检验,对三个中心的中心、医疗服务提供者和患者层面的数据进行了比较。结果显示新工具的内部一致性很高,Cronbach's alpha 得分为 0.938。结果发现,与高分娩率和中等分娩率的初级保健中心相比,分娩率最低的初级保健中心的初级保健绩效明显更高(P<0.000)。结论从多个角度对初级保健中心的绩效进行评估,可以真实地了解各中心的情况,尽管无法就各个角度达成一致意见,但评估结果是有效的。新的 Q4PHC 是一种从患者角度评估初级保健中心绩效的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gap Analysis of Providing Primary Health Care in Comprehensive Rural Health Centers of Iran Leading for Sustainable Health Systems Welcome to the final issue of the College’s Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management for 2023 Australian Health Services Management Courses: A discussion on syllabus Performance of Primary Health Centres, Provider’s Perspective of Wellbeing, and Patient’s Assessment of the Centres Using a New Tool in Bangalore, India: An empirical study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1