Pain score as a predictor of subsequent fragility fracture in postmenopausal patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective case-control study

IF 2.8 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.afos.2023.12.001
Ichiro Yoshii , Naoya Sawada , Tatsumi Chijiwa
{"title":"Pain score as a predictor of subsequent fragility fracture in postmenopausal patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective case-control study","authors":"Ichiro Yoshii ,&nbsp;Naoya Sawada ,&nbsp;Tatsumi Chijiwa","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Bone fragility fracture (BFF) is a serious incident in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We hypothesized that pain degree during treatment RA correlated with incident BFF and validated how pain affects incident BFF (inc-BFF).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Postmenopausal RA patients treated for at least 3 years were recruited. The primary endpoint was the development of inc-BFF. Follow-up began with the first bone mineral density measurement (baseline) and continued until the development of the first BFF or termination of the study. Clinical indicators at baseline, including pain score using a visual analog scale (PS-VAS), were analyzed statistically using Cox regression analysis, receiver operation characteristics (ROC), Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis (K-M), and chi-square test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 239 patients were recruited. Using a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the baseline's PS-VAS and prevalent BFF (pr-BFF) demonstrated significantly higher risk ratios. For ROC, pr-BFF and PS-VAS had significant cutoff index (COI) (positive, 21.0) and an area under-curve of 0.692 (P &lt; 0.001) and 0.616 (P &lt; 0.01), respectively. PS-VAS &gt; COI had a 2.24-fold higher hazard ratio than PS-VAS ≤ COI using K-M. When these 2 conditions were combined, patients with pr-BFF-positive and PS-VAS-positive had a sensitivity of 42.3% and a specificity of 88.8% for the inc-BFF. PS-VAS &gt; COI had no statistical significance in the subgroup without pr-BFF, whereas the existence of pr-BFF had a significantly higher risk ratio in the PS-VAS ≤ COI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PS-VAS during RA treatment is a good indicator for predicting the inc-BFF in postmenopausal RA patients with pr-BFF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 150-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525523001139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Bone fragility fracture (BFF) is a serious incident in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We hypothesized that pain degree during treatment RA correlated with incident BFF and validated how pain affects incident BFF (inc-BFF).

Methods

Postmenopausal RA patients treated for at least 3 years were recruited. The primary endpoint was the development of inc-BFF. Follow-up began with the first bone mineral density measurement (baseline) and continued until the development of the first BFF or termination of the study. Clinical indicators at baseline, including pain score using a visual analog scale (PS-VAS), were analyzed statistically using Cox regression analysis, receiver operation characteristics (ROC), Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis (K-M), and chi-square test.

Results

A total of 239 patients were recruited. Using a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the baseline's PS-VAS and prevalent BFF (pr-BFF) demonstrated significantly higher risk ratios. For ROC, pr-BFF and PS-VAS had significant cutoff index (COI) (positive, 21.0) and an area under-curve of 0.692 (P < 0.001) and 0.616 (P < 0.01), respectively. PS-VAS > COI had a 2.24-fold higher hazard ratio than PS-VAS ≤ COI using K-M. When these 2 conditions were combined, patients with pr-BFF-positive and PS-VAS-positive had a sensitivity of 42.3% and a specificity of 88.8% for the inc-BFF. PS-VAS > COI had no statistical significance in the subgroup without pr-BFF, whereas the existence of pr-BFF had a significantly higher risk ratio in the PS-VAS ≤ COI.

Conclusions

The PS-VAS during RA treatment is a good indicator for predicting the inc-BFF in postmenopausal RA patients with pr-BFF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疼痛评分是绝经后类风湿性关节炎患者发生脆性骨折的预测因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究
目的骨脆性骨折(BFF)是类风湿关节炎(RA)治疗中的严重并发症。我们假设RA治疗期间的疼痛程度与BFF事件相关,并验证疼痛如何影响BFF事件(包括BFF)。方法招募治疗至少3年的绝经后RA患者。研究的主要终点是发展成非闺蜜关系。随访从第一次骨密度测量(基线)开始,一直持续到第一个BFF的发展或研究结束。采用Cox回归分析、受试者操作特征(ROC)、Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析(K-M)和卡方检验对基线临床指标进行统计学分析,包括疼痛评分(PS-VAS)。结果共纳入239例患者。使用多变量Cox回归分析,基线的PS-VAS和流行BFF (pr-BFF)显示出显著更高的风险比。ROC方面,pr-BFF和PS-VAS的截断指数(COI)为正(21.0),曲线下面积为0.692 (P <;0.001)和0.616 (P <;分别为0.01)。PS-VAS祝辞使用K-M时,COI风险比PS-VAS≤COI高2.24倍。当这两种情况合并时,pr- bff阳性和ps - vas阳性患者对inc-BFF的敏感性为42.3%,特异性为88.8%。PS-VAS祝辞无pr-BFF亚组COI风险比无统计学意义,而存在pr-BFF的PS-VAS≤COI风险比显著升高。结论RA治疗期间的PS-VAS评分可以很好地预测绝经后RA患者的无bff。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
5.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies 2025 consensus on atypical femoral fractures in patients with osteoporosis Orthopedic referral rates following osteoporosis screening using dental panoramic radiography in female patients: A three-year prospective study Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic osteoporosis screening using artificial-intelligence assisted chest radiographs in Japan Preliminary analysis of combined romosozumab and denosumab versus teriparatide and denosumab on bone mineral density
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1