Observational Study of Conformity in Yet Another Medical Learning Environment: Conformity to Preceptors During High-Fidelity Simulation

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.2147/amep.s427996
Tanya N Beran, Ghazwan Altabbaa, Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci
{"title":"Observational Study of Conformity in Yet Another Medical Learning Environment: Conformity to Preceptors During High-Fidelity Simulation","authors":"Tanya N Beran, Ghazwan Altabbaa, Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci","doi":"10.2147/amep.s427996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> Altering one’s behavior to comply with inaccurate suggestions made by others (i.e., conformity) has been studied since the 1950s. Although several studies have documented its occurrence in medical education, it has yet to be examined in a high-fidelity simulation environment. It was hypothesized that a large majority of learners would conform to a preceptor.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> A total of 42 student dyads (a medical student paired with a resident) participated in one of four clinical scenarios to manage the diagnosis and treatment of a simulated patient encounter. Once the learners became familiar with the patient’s case, a preceptor entered the simulation, offered an equivocal suggestion about diagnosis or management, and then left. Two raters observed the video recordings of how the learners managed the case after this suggestion was made. The nature of these interactions was also documented.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Sixteen (38.10%) of the 42 medical student dyads conformed to the equivocal information presented by the preceptors. Observations of these interactions showed that all of the medical students conformed to the residents, but not all of the medical students conformed to the preceptors.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Many learners conform to preceptors by acting on their equivocal suggestion when managing a patient case during high-fidelity simulation.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> Adherence, medical students, Immersive learning, medical education, medical errors, patient safety<br/>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s427996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Altering one’s behavior to comply with inaccurate suggestions made by others (i.e., conformity) has been studied since the 1950s. Although several studies have documented its occurrence in medical education, it has yet to be examined in a high-fidelity simulation environment. It was hypothesized that a large majority of learners would conform to a preceptor.
Patients and Methods: A total of 42 student dyads (a medical student paired with a resident) participated in one of four clinical scenarios to manage the diagnosis and treatment of a simulated patient encounter. Once the learners became familiar with the patient’s case, a preceptor entered the simulation, offered an equivocal suggestion about diagnosis or management, and then left. Two raters observed the video recordings of how the learners managed the case after this suggestion was made. The nature of these interactions was also documented.
Results: Sixteen (38.10%) of the 42 medical student dyads conformed to the equivocal information presented by the preceptors. Observations of these interactions showed that all of the medical students conformed to the residents, but not all of the medical students conformed to the preceptors.
Conclusion: Many learners conform to preceptors by acting on their equivocal suggestion when managing a patient case during high-fidelity simulation.

Keywords: Adherence, medical students, Immersive learning, medical education, medical errors, patient safety
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
另一种医学学习环境中的一致性观察研究:高仿真模拟过程中对戒护者的服从性
目的:自 20 世纪 50 年代以来,人们一直在研究改变自己的行为以遵从他人提出的不准确建议(即一致性)。尽管有多项研究记录了医学教育中出现的这种情况,但尚未在高仿真模拟环境中进行过研究。假设绝大多数学习者都会服从戒律者:共有 42 个学生组合(一名医学生与一名住院医师配对)参与了四个临床场景中的一个,以管理模拟病人的诊断和治疗。一旦学员熟悉了病人的病例,一名戒律者就会进入模拟场景,对诊断或治疗提出一个模棱两可的建议,然后离开。两名评分员观察了学员在提出建议后如何处理病例的录像。这些互动的性质也被记录在案:结果:在 42 个医学生二人组中,有 16 个(38.10%)遵从了规训员提供的模棱两可的信息。对这些互动的观察表明,所有医学生都服从住院医师,但并非所有医学生都服从戒律组长:结论:在高仿真模拟过程中,许多学习者在处理患者病例时都会听从戒律师的建议:坚持 医学生 沉浸式学习 医学教育 医疗失误 患者安全
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Developing and Validating Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Rheumatology Fellowship Training Programs in Saudi Arabia: A Delphi Study Students’ Perception of Peer- Students Mentoring Program “Big Sibling Mentoring Program” to Complement Faculty Mentoring of First-Year Medical Students in Saudi Arabia Incorporating Technology Adoption in Medical Education: A Qualitative Study of Medical Students’ Perspectives [Letter] Development, Implementation, and Assessment of an Online Modular Telehealth Curriculum for Health Professions Students [Letter] Competency of Nurses on Electrocardiogram Monitoring and Interpretation in Selected Hospitals of Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1