Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407
Alice Windle, Amy Marshall, Lenore de la Perrelle, Stephanie Champion, Paul D S Ross, Gillian Harvey, Carol Davy
{"title":"Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review.","authors":"Alice Windle, Amy Marshall, Lenore de la Perrelle, Stephanie Champion, Paul D S Ross, Gillian Harvey, Carol Davy","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to identify factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aged care is a dynamic sector experiencing rapid change. Implementation of innovations in aged care has received relatively little research attention compared to health care.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review included studies of any design, that examined the implementation of innovations in aged care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, AgeLine, and ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection for studies published between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2022. The titles and abstracts of retrieved citations were screened by two independent reviewers. Full-text articles were screened by one reviewer to determine inclusion. Data were extracted in NVivo using a tool developed by the research team. Factors that influenced implementation were inductively coded, interpreted, and grouped into categories in a series of workshops.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2530 studies that were screened, 193 were included. Of the included papers, the majority (74%) related to residential aged care, 28% used an implementation theory or framework, and 15% involved consumers. Five key categories of factors influencing implementation were identified: organizational context including resourcing and culture; people's attitudes and capabilities; relationships between people; the intervention and its appropriateness; and implementation actions such as stakeholder engagement and implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings can be used to develop practical resources to support implementation efforts, and highlight the importance of resourcing for successful implementation. Attention to community-based aged care, and greater engagement with theory and community is needed to promote research rigor, relevance and applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to identify factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care.

Introduction: Aged care is a dynamic sector experiencing rapid change. Implementation of innovations in aged care has received relatively little research attention compared to health care.

Inclusion criteria: This review included studies of any design, that examined the implementation of innovations in aged care settings.

Methods: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, AgeLine, and ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection for studies published between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2022. The titles and abstracts of retrieved citations were screened by two independent reviewers. Full-text articles were screened by one reviewer to determine inclusion. Data were extracted in NVivo using a tool developed by the research team. Factors that influenced implementation were inductively coded, interpreted, and grouped into categories in a series of workshops.

Results: Of the 2530 studies that were screened, 193 were included. Of the included papers, the majority (74%) related to residential aged care, 28% used an implementation theory or framework, and 15% involved consumers. Five key categories of factors influencing implementation were identified: organizational context including resourcing and culture; people's attitudes and capabilities; relationships between people; the intervention and its appropriateness; and implementation actions such as stakeholder engagement and implementation strategies.

Conclusions: Our findings can be used to develop practical resources to support implementation efforts, and highlight the importance of resourcing for successful implementation. Attention to community-based aged care, and greater engagement with theory and community is needed to promote research rigor, relevance and applicability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响老年护理创新实施的因素:范围审查。
目标:本综述旨在确定影响老年护理创新实施的因素:养老护理是一个充满活力的行业,正经历着快速的变化。与医疗保健领域相比,养老护理领域实施创新的研究相对较少:本综述包括任何设计的研究,这些研究考察了创新在老年护理环境中的实施情况:方法:在 MEDLINE、CINAHL、AgeLine 和 ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection 中检索 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间发表的研究。检索到的引文的标题和摘要由两名独立审稿人进行筛选。文章全文由一名审稿人筛选,以确定是否纳入。使用研究团队开发的工具在 NVivo 中提取数据。在一系列研讨会上,对影响实施的因素进行了归纳编码、解释和分类:在筛选出的 2530 项研究中,有 193 项被纳入。在收录的论文中,大多数(74%)与养老院护理有关,28%使用了实施理论或框架,15%涉及消费者。研究确定了影响实施的五类关键因素:包括资源配置和文化在内的组织环境;人们的态度和能力;人与人之间的关系;干预措施及其适宜性;以及利益相关者参与和实施策略等实施行动:我们的研究结果可用于开发支持实施工作的实用资源,并强调资源配置对成功实施的重要性。需要关注以社区为基础的老年护理,并更多地参与理论和社区活动,以促进研究的严谨性、相关性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Planning for implementation success: insights from conducting an implementation needs assessment. Evidence-informed decision-making in public health in Canada: a qualitative exploration. Interruption reduction during oral medication rounds among nurses in hematology-oncology wards: a best practice implementation project. Promoting sleep and rest in hospitalized children: a best practice implementation project. Knowledge mapping of barriers and strategies for clinical practice guideline implementation: a bibliometric analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1