Modest building blocks: The state of the art of monopoly thinking at the turn of the Middle Ages and the Early Modern Period in the works of lawyers and theologians

Wout Vandermeulen
{"title":"Modest building blocks: The state of the art of monopoly thinking at the turn of the Middle Ages and the Early Modern Period in the works of lawyers and theologians","authors":"Wout Vandermeulen","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20233401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>This article seeks to contribute to the growing current of legal historical literature on early modern commercial law. It examines the topic of monopolies and their prohibition in the Codex of Justinian (C. 4,59,2). Its purpose is to explore one aspect of the renewed interest in the topic among lawyers and theologians in the early 16th century, when trading corporations and authorities worldly and ecclesial caused a proliferation of monopolies. The aspect in question is the source material from the legal and theological tradition that early modern authors had at their disposal. Through analysing the printed editions of medieval works from Roman and canon law and from theology, this contribution sketches an image of scattered attention and a strong focus on guilds until the very last years of the Middle Ages. Only after 1450 do the roots of the notions that would dominate later debates come to the fore, and near exclusively in the works of moral theologians such as Konrad Summenhart.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20233401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary

This article seeks to contribute to the growing current of legal historical literature on early modern commercial law. It examines the topic of monopolies and their prohibition in the Codex of Justinian (C. 4,59,2). Its purpose is to explore one aspect of the renewed interest in the topic among lawyers and theologians in the early 16th century, when trading corporations and authorities worldly and ecclesial caused a proliferation of monopolies. The aspect in question is the source material from the legal and theological tradition that early modern authors had at their disposal. Through analysing the printed editions of medieval works from Roman and canon law and from theology, this contribution sketches an image of scattered attention and a strong focus on guilds until the very last years of the Middle Ages. Only after 1450 do the roots of the notions that would dominate later debates come to the fore, and near exclusively in the works of moral theologians such as Konrad Summenhart.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最小的积木:中世纪与现代早期之交律师和神学家作品中的垄断思维艺术现状
摘要 本文旨在为日益增多的有关早期现代商业法的法律史文献做出贡献。文章探讨了垄断及其在《查士丁尼法典》(C. 4,59,2)中的禁止问题。其目的是探讨 16 世纪早期律师和神学家对这一主题重新产生兴趣的一个方面,当时贸易公司以及世俗和教会当局造成了垄断的激增。问题的关键在于现代早期作者所掌握的法律和神学传统的原始资料。通过分析中世纪罗马法、教会法和神学著作的印刷版本,这篇论文勾勒出了一幅直到中世纪最后几年人们对行会的分散关注和强烈关注的画面。只有在 1450 年之后,主导后来辩论的观念才开始凸显出来,而且几乎都是在康拉德-萨门哈特(Konrad Summenhart)等道德神学家的作品中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Donationem non facit? Donations to people in potestate of the donor in Roman law Private legal practice and public authority in early Venetian Ithaca: thirteen new notarial documents (1575–1599) ‘Scriptura recepta et usitata’: The impact of the Lex citandi on Justinian’s Digest The issue of sexuality in Italian penitentiary law: a 1930s debate between international influences and fascist prison policies Is legal history just writing a text?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1