Comparing mental health and mental capacity law data across borders: Challenges and opportunities

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q1 LAW International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101949
Gavin Davidson , Elizabeth Agnew , Lisa Brophy , Jim Campbell , Mary Donnelly , Anne-Maree Farrell , Trisha Forbes , Rhiannon Frowde , Brendan D. Kelly , Claire McCartan
{"title":"Comparing mental health and mental capacity law data across borders: Challenges and opportunities","authors":"Gavin Davidson ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Agnew ,&nbsp;Lisa Brophy ,&nbsp;Jim Campbell ,&nbsp;Mary Donnelly ,&nbsp;Anne-Maree Farrell ,&nbsp;Trisha Forbes ,&nbsp;Rhiannon Frowde ,&nbsp;Brendan D. Kelly ,&nbsp;Claire McCartan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The island of Ireland is partitioned into Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. In both jurisdictions, there have been important developments in mental health and mental capacity law, and associated policies and services. This includes an emphasis on developing more comprehensive approaches to collecting data on outcomes and so there is an opportunity to align these processes to enable comparison and shared learning across the border. This article explores: legal and policy developments; international approaches to mental health outcomes; and the type of data that would be helpful to collect to better understand the use of mental health and mental capacity laws. It is argued that an inclusive strategy to developing a comprehensive, integrated and aligned approach to collecting and analysing data would benefit citizens, policy makers and professionals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 101949"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000924/pdfft?md5=7d134dd88d886aa01cbc1910767edf1d&pid=1-s2.0-S0160252723000924-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The island of Ireland is partitioned into Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. In both jurisdictions, there have been important developments in mental health and mental capacity law, and associated policies and services. This includes an emphasis on developing more comprehensive approaches to collecting data on outcomes and so there is an opportunity to align these processes to enable comparison and shared learning across the border. This article explores: legal and policy developments; international approaches to mental health outcomes; and the type of data that would be helpful to collect to better understand the use of mental health and mental capacity laws. It is argued that an inclusive strategy to developing a comprehensive, integrated and aligned approach to collecting and analysing data would benefit citizens, policy makers and professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨境比较心理健康和心智能力法律数据:挑战与机遇。
爱尔兰岛分为北爱尔兰和爱尔兰共和国。在这两个辖区内,心理健康和心智能力法律以及相关政策和服务都有了重要的发展。这包括强调开发更全面的方法来收集有关结果的数据,因此有机会将这些过程统一起来,以便进行跨边界的比较和共同学习。本文探讨了:法律和政策的发展;心理健康成果的国际方法;以及有助于更好地了解心理健康和心智能力法律使用情况的数据类型。文章认为,制定一项全面、综合和统一的数据收集和分析方法的包容性战略将使公民、政策制定者和专业人士受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Institutionalized ignorance in court: Involuntary care and citizenship(s) A human rights indicator for the mental health context: A scoping review and analysis Mental health and sentencing: How are judicial decisions made in light of the judgement of R v Vowles? (A partial replication of Baldwin et al., 2025) Evaluation of dangerousness and risk of recidivism of Islamist terrorists by the expert psychiatrist: Analysis of 100 penal post-sentence expert reports in France Barriers and facilitators for mental-health professionals in the management and implementation of advance directives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1