The efficacy of various irrigation techniques on the removal of double antibiotic paste from simulated immature roots and the amount of apically extruded debris.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BDJ Open Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1038/s41405-023-00183-3
Shaimaa Nasr El-Din, Reham Hassan
{"title":"The efficacy of various irrigation techniques on the removal of double antibiotic paste from simulated immature roots and the amount of apically extruded debris.","authors":"Shaimaa Nasr El-Din, Reham Hassan","doi":"10.1038/s41405-023-00183-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the effect of the XP-Endo Finisher (XPF), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional irrigation using side-vented needle (SVN) on the amount of apically extruded debris and canal cleanliness following the removal of double antibiotic paste (DAP) from immature root canal models.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-eight extracted mandibular premolars were drilled using peeso drills to simulate immature apices. The canals were filled with DAP and were randomly assigned into 3 groups according to the DAP removal method: XPF, PUI, and SVN (n = 16). The amount of extruded debris was assessed with an analytical balance then roots were split longitudinally and imaged using stereomicroscope to evaluate the residual medicament. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's test. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to determine significant correlation between extruded debris and the residual DAP scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between debris extrusion values for all groups (P value 0.237). For canal cleanliness, the amount of remaining DAP was significantly lower in the XPF and PUI compared to SVN (P value < 0.001). A non-significant positive (direct) correlation was found between the amounts of apically extruded debris and residual DAP scores (P value 0.087).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>XPF and PUI were associated with better canal cleanliness during removal of DAP, no difference could be found between the three irrigation techniques regarding the debris extrusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10770069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00183-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the effect of the XP-Endo Finisher (XPF), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional irrigation using side-vented needle (SVN) on the amount of apically extruded debris and canal cleanliness following the removal of double antibiotic paste (DAP) from immature root canal models.

Material and methods: Forty-eight extracted mandibular premolars were drilled using peeso drills to simulate immature apices. The canals were filled with DAP and were randomly assigned into 3 groups according to the DAP removal method: XPF, PUI, and SVN (n = 16). The amount of extruded debris was assessed with an analytical balance then roots were split longitudinally and imaged using stereomicroscope to evaluate the residual medicament. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's test. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to determine significant correlation between extruded debris and the residual DAP scores.

Results: There was no significant difference between debris extrusion values for all groups (P value 0.237). For canal cleanliness, the amount of remaining DAP was significantly lower in the XPF and PUI compared to SVN (P value < 0.001). A non-significant positive (direct) correlation was found between the amounts of apically extruded debris and residual DAP scores (P value 0.087).

Conclusion: XPF and PUI were associated with better canal cleanliness during removal of DAP, no difference could be found between the three irrigation techniques regarding the debris extrusion.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各种灌洗技术对去除模拟未成熟牙根上的双抗生素糊剂和根尖挤出碎屑量的效果。
研究目的本研究评估了 XP-Endo Finisher (XPF)、被动超声波冲洗 (PUI) 和使用侧进针 (SVN) 的传统冲洗对未成熟根管模型去除双抗生素糊剂 (DAP) 后根尖挤出碎屑量和根管清洁度的影响:使用peeso钻模拟未成熟根尖,对48颗拔出的下颌前磨牙进行钻孔。用 DAP 填充根管,并根据去除 DAP 的方法随机分为 3 组:XPF组、PUI组和SVN组(n = 16)。用分析天平评估挤出的碎屑量,然后纵向劈开牙根,用立体显微镜成像以评估残留药物。数据采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Dunn 检验进行统计分析。斯皮尔曼相关系数用于确定挤出碎屑与残留 DAP 评分之间的显著相关性:各组的碎屑挤出量无明显差异(P 值为 0.237)。在牙道清洁度方面,XPF 和 PUI 组的残余 DAP 量明显低于 SVN 组(P 值 结论:XPF 和 PUI 组的残余 DAP 量明显高于 SVN 组(P 值):在去除 DAP 的过程中,XPF 和 PUI 的牙道清洁度更好,但三种灌洗技术在碎屑挤出方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of topical anesthetics of lidocaine, benzocaine, and EMLA in reducing pain during inferior alveolar nerve block in schoolchildren: a randomized controlled trial. Incidence of traumatic dental injuries associated with orotracheal intubation in general anesthesia in children during mixed dentition in Damascus, Syria: a prospective longitudinal study. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability and adaptation of gel form of MTA to dentinal walls: an in-vitro study. Knowledge and awareness of emergency department residents and physicians regarding the management of dentofacial traumatic injuries: a cross-sectional study. Evaluation of two different self-disinfection alginate impression material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1