Exploring an innovative approach to hydrogen generation for fuel cell energy production by integrating a dual organic Rankine system with an absorption chiller powered by geothermal energy

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy nexus Pub Date : 2023-12-23 DOI:10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100267
Ali Bedakhanian , Ehsanolah Assareh
{"title":"Exploring an innovative approach to hydrogen generation for fuel cell energy production by integrating a dual organic Rankine system with an absorption chiller powered by geothermal energy","authors":"Ali Bedakhanian ,&nbsp;Ehsanolah Assareh","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study delved into the thermodynamic optimization of a geothermal system integrated with a fuel cell unit for energy storage during peak consumption. An innovative system was devised to simultaneously produce cooling, electricity, hydrogen, and freshwater by combining an absorption chiller, reverse osmosis, PEM Electrolyzer, and two double Organic Rankine Cycles. To assess the impact of local weather conditions, case studies were conducted in the cities of Hong Kong (China), Bandar Abbas (Iran), Tepic (Mexico), and Melbourne (Australia). Computational modeling employed EES software, and optimization using Response Surface Methodology aimed to enhance system performance and minimize costs. The geothermal system was engineered to meet the electricity demands of residential households during peak consumption. The optimal results demonstrated that the proposed geothermal system, in its most efficient configuration, could achieve an exergy efficiency of 73.17 % and an energy efficiency of 25.25 % while operating at a cost rate of 74.36 $/h. An economic analysis revealed that among the system components, ORC1 unit and PEME incurred the highest costs. Additionally, the PEME, evaporator, and absorption chiller were identified as the main contributors to exergy destruction. The total exergy destruction rate of the proposed geothermal system is 1840.7 kWh and the total cost rate of the system is 51.73 $/h. Lastly, the assessment of the suggested geothermal system across the studied cities indicated that it performed most effectively in Melbourne, Australia. The results of the study of the production capacity in the four study cities showed that Melbourne has the highest production rate with a rate of 14,573 MWh, Tepic with a rate of 13,425 MWh, and Hong Kong with a rate of 13,174 MWh. The lowest annual rate with the amount of 12,784 MWh belongs to the city of Bandar Abbas. The environmental results showed that by producing 14,573 megawatts of electricity in the city of Melbourne, it is possible to expand 14 hectares of green space per year. Also, prevented the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions by 2972.8 tonsCO<sub>2</sub>/MWh at 71,349.4 $/tonsCO<sub>2</sub>. The analysis of the production power of the system showed that the electricity needs of 1533 people can be provided for one year by starting the geothermal system in Melbourne City.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100267"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000979/pdfft?md5=4e520beb9f8d6e96727e12c1d20fc07e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772427123000979-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study delved into the thermodynamic optimization of a geothermal system integrated with a fuel cell unit for energy storage during peak consumption. An innovative system was devised to simultaneously produce cooling, electricity, hydrogen, and freshwater by combining an absorption chiller, reverse osmosis, PEM Electrolyzer, and two double Organic Rankine Cycles. To assess the impact of local weather conditions, case studies were conducted in the cities of Hong Kong (China), Bandar Abbas (Iran), Tepic (Mexico), and Melbourne (Australia). Computational modeling employed EES software, and optimization using Response Surface Methodology aimed to enhance system performance and minimize costs. The geothermal system was engineered to meet the electricity demands of residential households during peak consumption. The optimal results demonstrated that the proposed geothermal system, in its most efficient configuration, could achieve an exergy efficiency of 73.17 % and an energy efficiency of 25.25 % while operating at a cost rate of 74.36 $/h. An economic analysis revealed that among the system components, ORC1 unit and PEME incurred the highest costs. Additionally, the PEME, evaporator, and absorption chiller were identified as the main contributors to exergy destruction. The total exergy destruction rate of the proposed geothermal system is 1840.7 kWh and the total cost rate of the system is 51.73 $/h. Lastly, the assessment of the suggested geothermal system across the studied cities indicated that it performed most effectively in Melbourne, Australia. The results of the study of the production capacity in the four study cities showed that Melbourne has the highest production rate with a rate of 14,573 MWh, Tepic with a rate of 13,425 MWh, and Hong Kong with a rate of 13,174 MWh. The lowest annual rate with the amount of 12,784 MWh belongs to the city of Bandar Abbas. The environmental results showed that by producing 14,573 megawatts of electricity in the city of Melbourne, it is possible to expand 14 hectares of green space per year. Also, prevented the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions by 2972.8 tonsCO2/MWh at 71,349.4 $/tonsCO2. The analysis of the production power of the system showed that the electricity needs of 1533 people can be provided for one year by starting the geothermal system in Melbourne City.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过整合双有机朗肯系统和以地热能为动力的吸收式冷却器,探索燃料电池制氢的创新方法
这项研究深入探讨了地热系统的热力学优化问题,该系统与燃料电池装置相结合,可在用电高峰期储存能量。通过将吸收式冷却器、反渗透、PEM 电解器和两个双有机朗肯循环结合在一起,设计出一种创新系统,可同时产生制冷、电力、氢气和淡水。为了评估当地天气条件的影响,在中国香港、伊朗阿巴斯港、墨西哥特皮奇和澳大利亚墨尔本等城市进行了案例研究。计算建模采用了 EES 软件,优化采用了响应面方法,旨在提高系统性能,最大限度地降低成本。地热系统的设计旨在满足居民家庭在用电高峰期的用电需求。优化结果表明,拟议的地热系统在其最高效的配置下,可实现 73.17% 的放能效率和 25.25% 的能效,而运行成本为 74.36 美元/小时。经济分析表明,在系统组件中,ORC1 设备和 PEME 的成本最高。此外,PEME、蒸发器和吸收式冷水机组被认为是造成热能破坏的主要因素。建议的地热系统的总能量损耗率为 1840.7 千瓦时,系统总成本率为 51.73 美元/小时。最后,对所建议的地热系统在所研究城市的评估表明,该系统在澳大利亚墨尔本的表现最为有效。对四个研究城市生产能力的研究结果表明,墨尔本的生产率最高,为 14,573 兆瓦时,特皮奇为 13,425 兆瓦时,香港为 13,174 兆瓦时。年发电量最低的是阿巴斯港,为 12 784 兆瓦时。环境研究结果表明,墨尔本市每年通过生产 14,573 兆瓦的电力,可以扩大 14 公顷的绿地面积。此外,还可减少二氧化碳排放量 2972.8 吨 CO2/MWh,每吨 CO2 为 71349.4 美元。对系统生产功率的分析表明,在墨尔本市启动地热系统可满足 1533 人一年的用电需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
期刊最新文献
Price disorder and information content in energy and gold markets: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic Business Models and Advanced Additive Manufacturing strategies for better sustainability Production economics and carbon footprint of an integrated timber harvesting operation in the Northeastern US Optimal rule-based energy management and sizing of a grid-connected renewable energy microgrid with hybrid storage using Levy Flight Algorithm pH shift extraction technique for plant proteins: A promising technique for sustainable development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1