Methodology for the Evaluation and Selection of High-Complexity Medical Equipment

Ignacio M. Marolla
{"title":"Methodology for the Evaluation and Selection of High-Complexity Medical Equipment","authors":"Ignacio M. Marolla","doi":"10.1097/JCE.0000000000000621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the need to acquire magnetic resonance imaging equipment through public tender, and to objectify the decision-making process, which takes into account multiple variables, a mathematical model has been developed based on the use of the analytic hierarchy process multicriteria analysis method, the linear weighting method, and the use of indicators to compare offers. For this purpose, a hierarchy of evaluating criteria to aid in selection processes has been defined and compared by a multidisciplinary team consisting of engineers, medical imaging specialists, lawyers, and economists who collaboratively developed and obtained a criteria prioritization scheme. Within this scheme, suppliers' offers were evaluated through indicators and then weighted accordingly to obtain a numerical ranking. The method has turned out to be applicable in evaluating and selecting highly complex biomedical technology and provides a hierarchical ranking of offers based on a numerical priority that considers multiple criteria. In the fast-growing market of medical technology, this method improves evaluative processes that depend on multiple criteria and helps institutions reduce risk when making decisions.","PeriodicalId":77198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical engineering","volume":"17 11","pages":"25 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCE.0000000000000621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the need to acquire magnetic resonance imaging equipment through public tender, and to objectify the decision-making process, which takes into account multiple variables, a mathematical model has been developed based on the use of the analytic hierarchy process multicriteria analysis method, the linear weighting method, and the use of indicators to compare offers. For this purpose, a hierarchy of evaluating criteria to aid in selection processes has been defined and compared by a multidisciplinary team consisting of engineers, medical imaging specialists, lawyers, and economists who collaboratively developed and obtained a criteria prioritization scheme. Within this scheme, suppliers' offers were evaluated through indicators and then weighted accordingly to obtain a numerical ranking. The method has turned out to be applicable in evaluating and selecting highly complex biomedical technology and provides a hierarchical ranking of offers based on a numerical priority that considers multiple criteria. In the fast-growing market of medical technology, this method improves evaluative processes that depend on multiple criteria and helps institutions reduce risk when making decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估和选择高复杂性医疗设备的方法
鉴于有必要通过公开招标采购磁共振成像设备,并使决策过程客观化,考虑到多种变 量,在使用层次分析法多标准分析方法、线性加权法和使用指标比较报价的基础上,开发 了一个数学模型。为此,一个由工程师、医学影像专家、律师和经济学家组成的多学科小组确定并比较了评估标准的层次结构,以帮助选择过程。在这一方案中,通过指标对供应商的报价进行评估,然后相应加权,得出一个数字排名。事实证明,该方法适用于评估和选择高度复杂的生物医学技术,并可根据考虑多种标准的数字优先级对报价进行分层排序。在快速增长的医疗技术市场中,该方法改进了依赖多种标准的评估过程,并帮助机构在决策时降低风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Doceree Launches Spark to Ignite New Era in Patient-Provider Engagement Digital Health Delivers Hospital Care Directly to Home Electrical System Requirements Following are excerpts from the March-April 2024 issue of ACCE News, the official newsletter of the American College of Clinical Engineering AAMI-FDA neXus Showcases Future of Cybersecurity Regulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1