CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING AND ENSURING THE TRUSTWORTHINESS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Z. Kakar, Rizwana Rasheed, A. Rashid, Salma Akhter
{"title":"CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING AND ENSURING THE TRUSTWORTHINESS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH","authors":"Z. Kakar, Rizwana Rasheed, A. Rashid, Salma Akhter","doi":"10.56249/ijbr.03.01.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The trustworthiness of qualitative data has been debatable, yet it has strong support from its supporters. However, the importance and worth of qualitative data cannot be undermined. This paper presents a critical review of the trustworthiness of the qualitative data. The degree of trustworthiness of qualitative research can be measured by ensuring the credibility, transferability, dependability, and conformability of research design, process, and action. The guarantee of trustworthiness in qualitative research is more complex than in quantitative research due to its subjective nature. Many researchers and experts denied the generalizability of qualitative research. However, few researchers, like Guba (1985), developed a widely accepted model and strategies to ensure the trustworthiness and generalizability of qualitative research. Credibility is like internal validity in quantitative analysis and provides the actual data about the phenomenon. Transferability shows the degree of application of the research finding in other exact natures of context, people, groups, and settings. If the findings of one study are replicated in a similar population, condition, or context, then the findings are dependable. Neutrality is the degree of fairness of results consisting of purity of initial responses and bias-free.","PeriodicalId":425224,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Business Reflections","volume":" 349","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Business Reflections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56249/ijbr.03.01.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The trustworthiness of qualitative data has been debatable, yet it has strong support from its supporters. However, the importance and worth of qualitative data cannot be undermined. This paper presents a critical review of the trustworthiness of the qualitative data. The degree of trustworthiness of qualitative research can be measured by ensuring the credibility, transferability, dependability, and conformability of research design, process, and action. The guarantee of trustworthiness in qualitative research is more complex than in quantitative research due to its subjective nature. Many researchers and experts denied the generalizability of qualitative research. However, few researchers, like Guba (1985), developed a widely accepted model and strategies to ensure the trustworthiness and generalizability of qualitative research. Credibility is like internal validity in quantitative analysis and provides the actual data about the phenomenon. Transferability shows the degree of application of the research finding in other exact natures of context, people, groups, and settings. If the findings of one study are replicated in a similar population, condition, or context, then the findings are dependable. Neutrality is the degree of fairness of results consisting of purity of initial responses and bias-free.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估和确保定性研究可信度的标准
定性数据的可信度一直备受争议,但却得到了支持者的大力支持。然而,定性数据的重要性和价值不容忽视。本文对定性数据的可信度进行了批判性评述。定性研究的可信度可以通过确保研究设计、过程和行动的可信性、可转移性、可依赖性和可遵循性来衡量。由于定性研究的主观性,保证定性研究的可信度比定量研究更为复杂。许多研究人员和专家否认定性研究的普遍性。不过,也有少数研究者,如 Guba(1985 年),提出了广为接受的模式和策略,以确保定性研究的可信度和可推广性。可信度就像定量分析中的内部效度,提供了有关现象的实际数据。可迁移性显示了研究结果在其他确切性质的背景、人群、群体和环境中的应用程度。如果一项研究的结果能在类似的人群、条件或环境中得到复制,那么研究结果就是可靠的。中立性是指结果的公平程度,包括初始反应的纯洁性和无偏见性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS FOR GRADUATES TO JOIN THE BANKING SECTOR IN PAKISTAN FOURIER CAUSALITY AND VOLATILITY SPILLOVER PERSPECTIVES TO ANALYZE THE EFFECT OF TERRORISM ON TURKISH AND EUROPEAN STOCK MARKETS DO DIFFERENT SECTORS AFFECT EQUITY RISK PREMIUMS IN EMERGING MARKETS? EVIDENCE FROM ASIA INFLUENCER MARKETING ON SOCIAL MEDIA: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF SOURCE CREDIBILITY IN GENERATING PARA SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS AND PRODUCT INTEREST FACTORS INFLUENCING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS IN SOUTH AFRICAN SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZE ENTERPRISES: A CONCEPTUAL STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1