Digital Leisure Time Tendency Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

F. Turhan, Ömer Faruk Tutar
{"title":"Digital Leisure Time Tendency Scale: Validity and Reliability Study","authors":"F. Turhan, Ömer Faruk Tutar","doi":"10.53016/jerp.v4i2.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the \"Digital Leisure Time Tendency Scale (DLTTS)\". The DLTTS was applied to a total of 1354 people, 648 women and 706 men. The Key Components Factor Analysis, which was carried out following the direct oblimin conversion of the participants' tendency scores to digital leisure activities in order to test the validity of the factor structure of the DLTTS, supports the 4-factor structure and explains 56.52% of the scale. The DLTTS consists of 4 sub-dimensions and 18 items in total, namely \"Communication\" (6 items), \"Social Interaction\" (5 items), \"Psychological Tendency\" (4), and \"Application Usage\" (3 items) sub-dimensions. Participants attitudes towards digital leisure activities are evaluated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. The KMO value of the scale was found to be 0.866. Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated for four sub-dimensions and the total scale. Accordingly, Communication = .79, Social Interaction = .78, Psychological Tendency: .80, and Application Usage = .65. The total reliability coefficient of the scale is quite reliable (α= .83). In conclusion, the Digital Leisure Time Tendency Scale reveals that it is a valid and reliable scale for assessing the digital leisure time Tendency of individuals over the age of 18.Keywords: Digital Leisure Time, Reliability, Tendency, Validity","PeriodicalId":165113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Recreation Patterns","volume":" 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Recreation Patterns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53016/jerp.v4i2.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the "Digital Leisure Time Tendency Scale (DLTTS)". The DLTTS was applied to a total of 1354 people, 648 women and 706 men. The Key Components Factor Analysis, which was carried out following the direct oblimin conversion of the participants' tendency scores to digital leisure activities in order to test the validity of the factor structure of the DLTTS, supports the 4-factor structure and explains 56.52% of the scale. The DLTTS consists of 4 sub-dimensions and 18 items in total, namely "Communication" (6 items), "Social Interaction" (5 items), "Psychological Tendency" (4), and "Application Usage" (3 items) sub-dimensions. Participants attitudes towards digital leisure activities are evaluated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. The KMO value of the scale was found to be 0.866. Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated for four sub-dimensions and the total scale. Accordingly, Communication = .79, Social Interaction = .78, Psychological Tendency: .80, and Application Usage = .65. The total reliability coefficient of the scale is quite reliable (α= .83). In conclusion, the Digital Leisure Time Tendency Scale reveals that it is a valid and reliable scale for assessing the digital leisure time Tendency of individuals over the age of 18.Keywords: Digital Leisure Time, Reliability, Tendency, Validity
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字休闲时间倾向量表:效度与信度研究
本研究旨在确定 "数字休闲时间倾向量表(DLTTS)"的有效性和可靠性。共有 1354 人使用了 DLTTS,其中女性 648 人,男性 706 人。为了检验 DLTTS 因子结构的有效性,在对参与者的数字休闲活动倾向得分进行直接顺反转换后,进行了关键成分因子分析,结果支持 4 因子结构,并解释了量表的 56.52%。DLTTS 包含 4 个子维度,共 18 个条目,分别是 "交流"(6 个条目)、"社交互动"(5 个条目)、"心理倾向"(4 个条目)和 "应用使用"(3 个条目)子维度。参与者对数字休闲活动的态度采用 5 点李克特量表进行评价。量表的 KMO 值为 0.866。计算了四个子维度和总量表的 Cronbach's Alpha 内部一致性系数。因此,沟通 = .79,社会互动 = .78,心理倾向:.80,应用使用 = .65。量表的总信度系数相当可靠(α= 0.83)。总之,数字闲暇时间倾向量表显示,它是评估 18 岁以上个人数字闲暇时间倾向的有效而可靠的量表:数字休闲时间 可靠性 倾向 有效性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the Effect of Push-Up Exercises with and without Suspension on Some Motor Skills Applied to Young Volleyball Athletes Examination of Variables Predicting the Emotional Intelligence Levels of Physical Education and Sports Teacher Candidates Using the CHAID Analysis The Effect of Attitudes Towards Physical Violence and Demographic Variables on Serious Leisure Time Activity Choice Motivation Profiles of Football Players: B2-B3 A Study on Individuals with Visual Challenges Examination of Mental Training and Digital Game Playing Habits of Athletes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1