Paradoxical Manifestations of Institutional Social Trust in Russian Regions: Corruption and Shadow Employment as Types of Social Trust

IF 0.1 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Engineering Technologies and Systems Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.15507/2413-1407.125.031.202304.733-753
I. Yurasov, V. Bondarenko, S. V. Polutin, O. A. Zyablikova, Olga N. Yurasova
{"title":"Paradoxical Manifestations of Institutional Social Trust in Russian Regions: Corruption and Shadow Employment as Types of Social Trust","authors":"I. Yurasov, V. Bondarenko, S. V. Polutin, O. A. Zyablikova, Olga N. Yurasova","doi":"10.15507/2413-1407.125.031.202304.733-753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The paradoxicality of which lies in the fact that with a lack of official institutional trust of the population in the authorities, it flows into informal, criminal and semi-criminal social spheres, into corrupt social ties and groups, and into the informal economy, shadow employment. The purpose of the article is to conduct a sociological theoretical and methodological analysis of the paradoxical forms of institutional social trust in Russian society in the form of corrupt and shadow economic ties. Materials and Methods. Empirical data on the shadow labor market in the Russian Federation were obtained in the course of mass and expert surveys conducted in 2021 in 10 regions of the Russian Federation and 2 megacities. In the course of preparing this publication, general scientific, logical methods were used, structural-functional, sociocultural, anthroposociocultural, projective approaches in modern sociology, the method of sociological imagination, the methodology of analysis and the formation of “we-groups”. Results. In the course of the authors’ research, it was found that such negative social phenomena as domestic and business corruption, shadow (informal) employment are a paradoxical form of expression of institutional trust in society. The paradox of the sociological correlation of corruption and shadow employment with institutional trust only at first glance seems illogical and contrary to sound scientific understanding. As a result of the analysis, the authors have revealed that with a lack of basic institutional trust of the Russian population in state and municipal authorities, social trust flows into informal, semi-criminal and criminal spheres. It has been proved that corruption and informal employment as forms of social practice become forms of expression of specific political trust based on strong social ties (blood related, kindred, friendly) in Russian regions. The authors’ team determined that corruption and informal employment are becoming a type of informal social self-organization of society, which close the gap between the political communications of the elite and the expectations of civil society. Discussion and Conclusion. Corruption and the informal economy are becoming a paradoxical form of manifestation of situational, horizontal, institutional trust based on strong (blood related, kindred, friendly) ties, on the social ties of “we-groups”, on the atomism of the Russian regional society. This research can be practically used by sociologists, lawyers, criminologists, social psychologists, law enforcement officers of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":53796,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Technologies and Systems","volume":" 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Technologies and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.125.031.202304.733-753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The paradoxicality of which lies in the fact that with a lack of official institutional trust of the population in the authorities, it flows into informal, criminal and semi-criminal social spheres, into corrupt social ties and groups, and into the informal economy, shadow employment. The purpose of the article is to conduct a sociological theoretical and methodological analysis of the paradoxical forms of institutional social trust in Russian society in the form of corrupt and shadow economic ties. Materials and Methods. Empirical data on the shadow labor market in the Russian Federation were obtained in the course of mass and expert surveys conducted in 2021 in 10 regions of the Russian Federation and 2 megacities. In the course of preparing this publication, general scientific, logical methods were used, structural-functional, sociocultural, anthroposociocultural, projective approaches in modern sociology, the method of sociological imagination, the methodology of analysis and the formation of “we-groups”. Results. In the course of the authors’ research, it was found that such negative social phenomena as domestic and business corruption, shadow (informal) employment are a paradoxical form of expression of institutional trust in society. The paradox of the sociological correlation of corruption and shadow employment with institutional trust only at first glance seems illogical and contrary to sound scientific understanding. As a result of the analysis, the authors have revealed that with a lack of basic institutional trust of the Russian population in state and municipal authorities, social trust flows into informal, semi-criminal and criminal spheres. It has been proved that corruption and informal employment as forms of social practice become forms of expression of specific political trust based on strong social ties (blood related, kindred, friendly) in Russian regions. The authors’ team determined that corruption and informal employment are becoming a type of informal social self-organization of society, which close the gap between the political communications of the elite and the expectations of civil society. Discussion and Conclusion. Corruption and the informal economy are becoming a paradoxical form of manifestation of situational, horizontal, institutional trust based on strong (blood related, kindred, friendly) ties, on the social ties of “we-groups”, on the atomism of the Russian regional society. This research can be practically used by sociologists, lawyers, criminologists, social psychologists, law enforcement officers of the Russian Federation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯地区制度性社会信任的矛盾表现:作为社会信任类型的腐败和影子就业
导言。俄罗斯社会中的制度性社会信任是一种悖论,其悖论性在于,由于民众对当局缺乏正式的制度性信任,这种信任就会流入非正规、犯罪和半犯罪的社会领域,流入腐败的社会关系和团体,流入非正规经济、影子就业。本文旨在从社会学理论和方法论角度分析俄罗斯社会中以腐败和影子经济联系为形式的制度性社会信任的矛盾形式。 材料与方法。关于俄罗斯联邦影子劳动力市场的经验数据是 2021 年在俄罗斯联邦 10 个地区和 2 个特大城市进行的群众和专家调查过程中获得的。在编写本出版物的过程中,使用了现代社会学中的一般科学逻辑方法、结构-功能方法、社会文化方法、人类社会文化方法、投射方法、社会学想象方法、分析方法和 "我们群体 "的形成方法。 研究结果作者在研究过程中发现,家庭和商业腐败、影子(非正式)就业等负面社会现象是社会中制度信任的一种自相矛盾的表现形式。腐败和影子就业与制度信任之间的社会学相关性悖论乍一看似乎不合逻辑,有悖于正确的科学认识。通过分析,作者发现,由于俄罗斯民众对国家和市政当局缺乏基本的制度信任,社会信任流向了非正规、半犯罪和犯罪领域。事实证明,在俄罗斯各地区,腐败和非正规就业作为一种社会实践形式,已成为基于紧密社会联系(血缘、亲缘、友缘)的特定政治信任的表现形式。作者团队认为,腐败和非正规就业正在成为一种非正式的社会自我组织,它缩小了精英政治沟通与民间社会期望之间的差距。 讨论与结论。腐败和非正规经济正在成为一种自相矛盾的形式,它体现了建立在强大(血缘、亲缘、友缘)纽带、"我们群体 "的社会纽带和俄罗斯地区社会原子主义基础上的情境性、水平性和制度性信任。这项研究可供俄罗斯联邦的社会学家、律师、犯罪学家、社会心理学家和执法人员实际使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Technologies and Systems
Engineering Technologies and Systems ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Muslim Values in the Perception of Modern Tatar Youth: A Regional Aspect Migration Management in the Western Balkan Region: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina Counterfactual Analysis of the Efficiency of Decontamination of Livestock Production Organic Wastes Patterns of Influence of Winter Wheat Sowing Density on Its Yield Influence of the Processes of Fluffing the Flax Stem Strips on the Structural Parameters of the Layer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1