A Study on the Efficacy of Different Botanicals Against Potato Tuber Moth (Phthorimaea Operculella) in Stored Potatoes

Bibek Lamsal, Saraddha Khasu Magar, K. Bhusal, Srijana Bharati
{"title":"A Study on the Efficacy of Different Botanicals Against Potato Tuber Moth (Phthorimaea Operculella) in Stored Potatoes","authors":"Bibek Lamsal, Saraddha Khasu Magar, K. Bhusal, Srijana Bharati","doi":"10.46336/ijqrm.v4i4.531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Potato Tuber Moth (Phthorimaea operculella) is a destructive pest that poses a significant threat to stored potato crops, leading to substantial economic losses worldwide. The use of chemical insecticides to control this pest has drawbacks such as environmental pollution and potential harm to human health. As a result, it is critical to investigate alternate control strategies, such as botanical extracts. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different botanicals, Azadirachta indica (Neem), Acorus calamus (sweet flag), Sapindus mukorossi (Soapnut) and their combination against the Potato Tuber Moth in stored potatoes. The research followed a randomized sampling technique, with seven treatments {T1: sweet flag (100%), T2: Neem (100%), T3: neem (50%)+ soapnut(50%), T4: soapnut powder (100%), T5: sweet flag (50%)+ Neem (50%), T6: sweet flag (50%)+ soapnut(50%), T7: control }. The treatments were applied to potatoes and data were observed, recorded, and tabulated. Our results showed that there was not a huge difference in the final result of mortality in all the treatments, all showing similar results. But when observed by counting the time factor, Acorus calamus outsmarted other bio-pesticides by killing 100% of insects in much less time. Further, all the treatments significantly affect the weight loss of potato tuber. Potato tuber treated with T1 showed the least weight loss of 1.88% of total weight followed by T6 and T4 with 2.56% and 2.58% of weight loss respectively. There was also some weight loss in the untreated potatoes due to evaporation and other physical factors. To sum up the overall result of our study, the experiment concluded that Acorus calamus (T1) had given the best result and thus it stood to be the best bio-pesticide among all.","PeriodicalId":14309,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Quantitative Research and Modeling","volume":" 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Quantitative Research and Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46336/ijqrm.v4i4.531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Potato Tuber Moth (Phthorimaea operculella) is a destructive pest that poses a significant threat to stored potato crops, leading to substantial economic losses worldwide. The use of chemical insecticides to control this pest has drawbacks such as environmental pollution and potential harm to human health. As a result, it is critical to investigate alternate control strategies, such as botanical extracts. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different botanicals, Azadirachta indica (Neem), Acorus calamus (sweet flag), Sapindus mukorossi (Soapnut) and their combination against the Potato Tuber Moth in stored potatoes. The research followed a randomized sampling technique, with seven treatments {T1: sweet flag (100%), T2: Neem (100%), T3: neem (50%)+ soapnut(50%), T4: soapnut powder (100%), T5: sweet flag (50%)+ Neem (50%), T6: sweet flag (50%)+ soapnut(50%), T7: control }. The treatments were applied to potatoes and data were observed, recorded, and tabulated. Our results showed that there was not a huge difference in the final result of mortality in all the treatments, all showing similar results. But when observed by counting the time factor, Acorus calamus outsmarted other bio-pesticides by killing 100% of insects in much less time. Further, all the treatments significantly affect the weight loss of potato tuber. Potato tuber treated with T1 showed the least weight loss of 1.88% of total weight followed by T6 and T4 with 2.56% and 2.58% of weight loss respectively. There was also some weight loss in the untreated potatoes due to evaporation and other physical factors. To sum up the overall result of our study, the experiment concluded that Acorus calamus (T1) had given the best result and thus it stood to be the best bio-pesticide among all.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同植物药对贮藏马铃薯中马铃薯块茎蛾(Phthorimaea Operculella)的药效研究
马铃薯块茎夜蛾(Phthorimaea operculella)是一种破坏性害虫,对贮藏马铃薯作物构成重大威胁,在全球范围内造成重大经济损失。使用化学杀虫剂控制这种害虫存在环境污染和对人类健康的潜在危害等缺点。因此,研究植物提取物等替代控制策略至关重要。本研究旨在评估不同植物药 Azadirachta indica(印度楝)、Acorus calamus(甜旗)、Sapindus mukorossi(无患子)及其组合对储藏马铃薯中马铃薯块茎蛾的防治效果。研究采用随机抽样技术,共设七个处理{T1:甜旗(100%),T2:印楝(100%),T3:印楝(50%)+皂角(50%),T4:皂角粉(100%),T5:甜旗(50%)+印楝(50%),T6:甜旗(50%)+皂角(50%),T7:对照}。在马铃薯上施用了这些处理,并对数据进行了观察、记录和制表。结果表明,所有处理的最终死亡率差异不大,都显示出相似的结果。但在计算时间因素时,石菖蒲胜过其他生物农药,能在更短的时间内杀死 100%的昆虫。此外,所有处理都会明显影响马铃薯块茎的重量损失。用 T1 处理的马铃薯块茎重量损失最少,仅占总重量的 1.88%,其次是 T6 和 T4,重量损失分别为 2.56% 和 2.58%。由于蒸发和其他物理因素,未经处理的马铃薯也有一些重量损失。总结我们研究的总体结果,实验得出的结论是唐菖蒲(T1)的效果最好,因此它是所有生物农药中最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk Measurement of Investment Portfolio Using Var and Cvar from The Top 10 Traded Stocks on the IDX Application of Structural Equations Modeling Partial Least Square at the Comparation of the Niveau of Responsibility From Cs and Digics Investment Portfolio Optimization In Infrastructure Stocks Using The Mean-VaR Risk Tolerance Model A Scoping Review of Green Supply Chain and Company Performance Application of Mathematical Model in Bioeconomic Analysis of Skipjack Fish in Pelabuhanratu, Sukabumi Regency, Jawa Barat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1