ECtHR: Erik Adamčo v. Slovakia (Application no. 19990/20, 1 June 2023)

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Bratislava Law Review Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.760
Stanislav Mihálik, Lukáš Turay
{"title":"ECtHR: Erik Adamčo v. Slovakia (Application no. 19990/20, 1 June 2023)","authors":"Stanislav Mihálik, Lukáš Turay","doi":"10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main task of the presented commentary is primarily the analysis of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the case of Erik Adamčo v. Slovakia (Application no. 19990/20) dated June 1, 2023. This analysis specifically considers the implications for legal practice in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. The legal framework focuses on cooperating individuals and their testimonies during criminal proceedings, particularly considering the necessity of perceiving the proportionality of using such evidence in relation to guarantees securing the overall fairness of the proceedings. Examining this question is particularly significant in cases involving statements of individuals who admitted to committing criminal activities in the initial stages of criminal proceedings and subsequently agreed to cooperate with the prosecution in order to obtain certain benefits. The inherent issue in this regard is not merely the use of this type of evidence but rather the manner in which it is utilised, emphasising the perception of the benefits associated with its provision.","PeriodicalId":33796,"journal":{"name":"Bratislava Law Review","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bratislava Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main task of the presented commentary is primarily the analysis of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the case of Erik Adamčo v. Slovakia (Application no. 19990/20) dated June 1, 2023. This analysis specifically considers the implications for legal practice in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. The legal framework focuses on cooperating individuals and their testimonies during criminal proceedings, particularly considering the necessity of perceiving the proportionality of using such evidence in relation to guarantees securing the overall fairness of the proceedings. Examining this question is particularly significant in cases involving statements of individuals who admitted to committing criminal activities in the initial stages of criminal proceedings and subsequently agreed to cooperate with the prosecution in order to obtain certain benefits. The inherent issue in this regard is not merely the use of this type of evidence but rather the manner in which it is utilised, emphasising the perception of the benefits associated with its provision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲人权法院:Erik Adamčo诉斯洛伐克(第19990/20号申请,2023年6月1日)
本评论的主要任务是分析欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)于 2023 年 6 月 1 日对 Erik Adamčo 诉斯洛伐克一案(第 19990/20 号诉状)所作的裁决。本分析特别考虑了该案对斯洛伐克共和国法律实践的影响。法律框架的重点是在刑事诉讼期间提供合作的个人及其证词,特别是考虑到有必要认识到使用此类证据与确保诉讼程序整体公正性的保证之间的相称性。在涉及个人陈述的案件中,审查这一问题尤为重要,这些个人在刑事诉讼初始阶段承认实施了犯罪活动,随后同意与检方合作以获得某些利益。这方面的固有问题不仅仅是这类证据的使用问题,而是利用这类证据的方式问题,强调的是对提供这类证据所带来的好处的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Marshall, Tim: Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Tell You Everything You Need to Know About Global Politics Metropolises - the Contemporary Challenge to Local Governments Efficiency of Pre-Trial Proceedings – Current Challenges of Criminal Law ECtHR: Żurek v. Poland (Application No. 39650/18, 16 June 2022) Framework for Effective Smart Contracting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1