Light curve and hardness tests for millilensing in GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.1093/mnrasl/slad202
O. Mukherjee, Robert Nemiroff
{"title":"Light curve and hardness tests for millilensing in GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A","authors":"O. Mukherjee, Robert Nemiroff","doi":"10.1093/mnrasl/slad202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analyses are given on four recent gravitational millilensing claims on gamma-ray bursts (GRBs): GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A. Two tests, a light curve similarity test and a hardness similarity test, compare different temporal sections of a single GRB to see if they are statistically similar. The hardness similarity test shows that the ratio between the second and the first emission episodes in each energy channel differed from the same ratio averaged over all energy channels at above 90 per cent confidence level in GRB 081122A. Additionally, the light curve similarity test applied to GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, and GRB 110517B separately indicated a high likelihood that the two emission episodes in each GRB were not from the same parent emission episode. This conclusion was reached with confidence levels of 4.8 sigma for GRB 081122A, 3.08 sigma for GRB 081126A, and 8.45 sigma for GRB 110517B. However, these tests did not detect a significant difference between the pulses of GRB 210812A. Consequently, our results suggest that while GRB 210812A could not be conclusively ruled out, the other three GRBs do not show clear evidence of millilensing.","PeriodicalId":18951,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters","volume":"153 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slad202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analyses are given on four recent gravitational millilensing claims on gamma-ray bursts (GRBs): GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A. Two tests, a light curve similarity test and a hardness similarity test, compare different temporal sections of a single GRB to see if they are statistically similar. The hardness similarity test shows that the ratio between the second and the first emission episodes in each energy channel differed from the same ratio averaged over all energy channels at above 90 per cent confidence level in GRB 081122A. Additionally, the light curve similarity test applied to GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, and GRB 110517B separately indicated a high likelihood that the two emission episodes in each GRB were not from the same parent emission episode. This conclusion was reached with confidence levels of 4.8 sigma for GRB 081122A, 3.08 sigma for GRB 081126A, and 8.45 sigma for GRB 110517B. However, these tests did not detect a significant difference between the pulses of GRB 210812A. Consequently, our results suggest that while GRB 210812A could not be conclusively ruled out, the other three GRBs do not show clear evidence of millilensing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GRB 081122A、GRB 081126A、GRB 110517B和GRB 210812A中毫光的光曲线和硬度测试
对最近四次关于伽马射线暴(GRB)的引力毫感应索赔进行了分析:GRB 081122A、GRB 081126A、GRB 110517B 和 GRB 210812A。光曲线相似性测试和硬度相似性测试这两项测试比较了单个伽马射线暴的不同时间截面,看它们在统计上是否相似。硬度相似性测试表明,在 GRB 081122A 中,每个能量通道的第二次和第一次发射事件之间的比率与所有能量通道平均值的相同比率之间的差异在 90% 以上的置信水平。此外,对 GRB 081122A、GRB 081126A 和 GRB 110517B 分别进行的光曲线相似性测试表明,每个 GRB 中的两个发射事件很可能不是来自同一个母发射事件。得出这一结论的置信度为:GRB 081122A 为 4.8 sigma,GRB 081126A 为 3.08 sigma,GRB 110517B 为 8.45 sigma。然而,这些测试并没有发现 GRB 210812A 的脉冲之间存在显著差异。因此,我们的结果表明,虽然不能最终排除 GRB 210812A 的可能性,但其他三个 GRB 并没有显示出明显的毫光证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters Earth and Planetary Sciences-Space and Planetary Science
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
136
期刊介绍: For papers that merit urgent publication, MNRAS Letters, the online section of Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, publishes short, topical and significant research in all fields of astronomy. Letters should be self-contained and describe the results of an original study whose rapid publication might be expected to have a significant influence on the subsequent development of research in the associated subject area. The 5-page limit must be respected. Authors are required to state their reasons for seeking publication in the form of a Letter when submitting their manuscript.
期刊最新文献
A tight N/O–potential relation in star-forming galaxies Constraining fundamental constants with fast radio bursts: Unveiling the role of energy scale TeV afterglow from GRB 221009A: photohadronic origin? Emirical calibration for helium abundance determinations in active galactic nuclei One-sided Hα excess before the first pericentre passage in galaxy Pairs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1