Peculiarities of Labour Rights Protection in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Bratislava Law Review Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.347
Oleg M. Yaroshenko, Hanna V. Anisimova, R. Y. Prokopiev, Ivan P. Zhygalkin, O. A. Yakovlyev
{"title":"Peculiarities of Labour Rights Protection in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights","authors":"Oleg M. Yaroshenko, Hanna V. Anisimova, R. Y. Prokopiev, Ivan P. Zhygalkin, O. A. Yakovlyev","doi":"10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of defence of labour disputes is quite dynamic. That is why the analysis of labour rights protection in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is quite relevant. The purpose of the study is to analyse the current case law of the European Court of Human Rights on the protection of labour rights; to analyse the ECtHR's interpretation of the concept of forced labour and the right to form trade unions; to summarise the problematic issues of the ECtHR's case law in the field of labour rights protection and ways to resolve them. The methodological basis of the study is general and special methods and techniques of cognition. The article substantiates that one cannot complain directly to the ECtHR about deprivation of the opportunity to work, denial of access to the workplace, or refusal to hire. The European Convention explicitly states only 2 rights: the right to form and join trade unions and the prohibition of forced and compulsory labour. The author explains the concepts of forced labour and the right to form trade unions and outlines the problematic issues of the European Court of Human Rights case law in the field of labour rights protection and ways to resolve them.","PeriodicalId":33796,"journal":{"name":"Bratislava Law Review","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bratislava Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practice of defence of labour disputes is quite dynamic. That is why the analysis of labour rights protection in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is quite relevant. The purpose of the study is to analyse the current case law of the European Court of Human Rights on the protection of labour rights; to analyse the ECtHR's interpretation of the concept of forced labour and the right to form trade unions; to summarise the problematic issues of the ECtHR's case law in the field of labour rights protection and ways to resolve them. The methodological basis of the study is general and special methods and techniques of cognition. The article substantiates that one cannot complain directly to the ECtHR about deprivation of the opportunity to work, denial of access to the workplace, or refusal to hire. The European Convention explicitly states only 2 rights: the right to form and join trade unions and the prohibition of forced and compulsory labour. The author explains the concepts of forced labour and the right to form trade unions and outlines the problematic issues of the European Court of Human Rights case law in the field of labour rights protection and ways to resolve them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲人权法院判例法中劳动权利保护的特殊性
劳资纠纷的辩护实践是非常动态的。这就是为什么对欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)的劳动权利保护进行分析具有相当重要的意义。本研究的目的是分析欧洲人权法院关于劳动权利保护的现行判例法;分析欧洲人权法院对强迫劳动概念和组织工会权利的解释;总结欧洲人权法院判例法在劳动权利保护领域存在的问题以及解决这些问题的方法。研究的方法论基础是一般和特殊的认知方法和技术。文章证实,人们不能直接向欧洲人权法院投诉被剥夺工作机会、被拒绝进入工作场所或被拒绝雇用。欧洲公约》只明确规定了两项权利:组织和加入工会的权利以及禁止强迫和强制劳动。作者解释了强迫劳动和组织工会权利的概念,并概述了欧洲人权法院在劳动权利保护领域的判例法中存在的问题以及解决这些问题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Marshall, Tim: Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Tell You Everything You Need to Know About Global Politics Metropolises - the Contemporary Challenge to Local Governments Efficiency of Pre-Trial Proceedings – Current Challenges of Criminal Law ECtHR: Żurek v. Poland (Application No. 39650/18, 16 June 2022) Framework for Effective Smart Contracting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1