Virtual stenting and coregistration of instantaneous wave-free ratio to predict the physiological effect of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multilevel coronary artery disease

K. Petrosyan, A. Abrosimov, E. Goncharova, N. Bulaeva, B. Berdibekov, E. Z. Golukhova
{"title":"Virtual stenting and coregistration of instantaneous wave-free ratio to predict the physiological effect of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multilevel coronary artery disease","authors":"K. Petrosyan, A. Abrosimov, E. Goncharova, N. Bulaeva, B. Berdibekov, E. Z. Golukhova","doi":"10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To evaluate the accuracy of virtual stenting in predicting the physiological effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for multilevel coronary artery disease (CAD).Material and methods. In order to define PCI strategy, 34 patients with multilevel CAD underwent assessment of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) with mapping. Using the virtual stenting, predicted iFR (priFR) was assessed. After stent implantation, the factual iFR (fiFR) was re-assessed. A discrepancy between the priFR and fiFR by 0,03 was considered the threshold level of a significant difference and \"poor agreement\" criterion between measurements.Results. Mean iFR before PCI was 0,77±0,11; after PCI, this indicator increased significantly and amounted to 0,94±0,04 (p<0,001). Comparison of the predicted and factual iFR revealed that the difference did not significantly depend on the value (rxy=-0,183; p=0,300), and mean difference between measurements was 0,013 (standard deviation, ±0,019), which indicates no systematic discrepancy and good comparability of the studied methods. In addition, correlation analysis of priFR and fiFR revealed a significant strong (Chaddock scale) direct relationship (r=0,854; p<0,001). Independent predictors of \"poor agreement\" were heart rate and systolic blood pressure before surgery. Discrepancy in decisions on the choice of stented lesions and the required number of stents based on coronary angiography (CAG) and MRI occurred in 21 patients (62%) and 16 patients (47%), respectively. After iFR measurement, there was a significant decrease in the mean length of affected segment (from 61,82±19,68 mm (CAG) and 49,15±19,19 mm (iFR)), which made it possible to significantly reduce the number of implanted stents from 1,91±0,57 (CAG) to 1,50±0,56 (p=0,001).Conclusion. Mapping the iFR and virtual stenting technology makes it possible to revise the classification of coronary lesions by length, which leads to a significant reduction in the number of implanted stents and the length of stented segment. High correlation between priFR and fiFR achieved in our study indicates the high accuracy of virtual stenting in predicting the physiological effect of stenting.","PeriodicalId":21389,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Cardiology","volume":"16 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the accuracy of virtual stenting in predicting the physiological effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for multilevel coronary artery disease (CAD).Material and methods. In order to define PCI strategy, 34 patients with multilevel CAD underwent assessment of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) with mapping. Using the virtual stenting, predicted iFR (priFR) was assessed. After stent implantation, the factual iFR (fiFR) was re-assessed. A discrepancy between the priFR and fiFR by 0,03 was considered the threshold level of a significant difference and "poor agreement" criterion between measurements.Results. Mean iFR before PCI was 0,77±0,11; after PCI, this indicator increased significantly and amounted to 0,94±0,04 (p<0,001). Comparison of the predicted and factual iFR revealed that the difference did not significantly depend on the value (rxy=-0,183; p=0,300), and mean difference between measurements was 0,013 (standard deviation, ±0,019), which indicates no systematic discrepancy and good comparability of the studied methods. In addition, correlation analysis of priFR and fiFR revealed a significant strong (Chaddock scale) direct relationship (r=0,854; p<0,001). Independent predictors of "poor agreement" were heart rate and systolic blood pressure before surgery. Discrepancy in decisions on the choice of stented lesions and the required number of stents based on coronary angiography (CAG) and MRI occurred in 21 patients (62%) and 16 patients (47%), respectively. After iFR measurement, there was a significant decrease in the mean length of affected segment (from 61,82±19,68 mm (CAG) and 49,15±19,19 mm (iFR)), which made it possible to significantly reduce the number of implanted stents from 1,91±0,57 (CAG) to 1,50±0,56 (p=0,001).Conclusion. Mapping the iFR and virtual stenting technology makes it possible to revise the classification of coronary lesions by length, which leads to a significant reduction in the number of implanted stents and the length of stented segment. High correlation between priFR and fiFR achieved in our study indicates the high accuracy of virtual stenting in predicting the physiological effect of stenting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用虚拟支架和瞬时无波比值核心注册预测多层冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的生理效应
目的评估虚拟支架在预测多层冠状动脉疾病(CAD)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的生理效应方面的准确性。为了确定PCI策略,34名多层冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者接受了瞬时无波比(iFR)测绘评估。通过虚拟支架植入术,对预测的 iFR(priFR)进行了评估。支架植入后,重新评估了实际的 iFR(fiFR)。priFR和fiFR之间的差异(0,03)被认为是显著差异的临界值,也是测量结果之间 "一致性差 "的标准。PCI前的平均iFR为0.77±0.11;PCI后,该指标显著增加,达到0.94±0.04(p<0.001)。预测 iFR 与实际 iFR 的比较显示,两者之间的差异与数值无明显关系(rxy=-0,183;p=0,300),测量值之间的平均差异为 0,013(标准差,±0,019),这表明所研究的方法没有系统性差异,具有良好的可比性。此外,priFR 和 fiFR 的相关性分析表明,两者之间存在显著的强(查道克量表)直接关系(r=0,854;p<0,001)。心率和术前收缩压是 "一致性差 "的独立预测因素。21名患者(62%)和16名患者(47%)在根据冠状动脉造影(CAG)和核磁共振成像选择支架病变和所需支架数量的决定上出现分歧。测量 iFR 后,受影响区段的平均长度显著减少(从 61,82±19,68 mm(CAG)和 49,15±19,19 mm(iFR)),这使得植入支架的数量从 1,91±0,57 (CAG)显著减少到 1,50±0,56 (P=0,001)。绘制 iFR 和虚拟支架技术使冠状动脉病变的长度分类得以修正,从而显著减少了植入支架的数量和支架段的长度。我们的研究实现了 priFR 和 fiFR 之间的高度相关性,这表明虚拟支架技术在预测支架植入的生理效应方面具有很高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Cardiology
Russian Journal of Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Cardiology has been issued since 1996. The language of this publication is Russian, with tables of contents and abstracts of all articles presented in English as well. Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Eugene V.Shlyakhto, President of the Russian Society of Cardiology. The aim of the journal is both scientific and practical, also with referring to organizing matters of the Society. The best of all cardiologic research in Russia is submitted to the Journal. Moreover, it contains useful tips and clinical examples for practicing cardiologists. Journal is peer-reviewed, with multi-stage editing. The editorial board is presented by the leading cardiologists from different cities of Russia.
期刊最新文献
Mature neutrophils as a marker of hypoechoic carotid plaques and a predictor of polyvascular disease progression Oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease Myocardial infarction in persons aged ≥75 years: factors influencing inhospital mortality Comparative analysis of two multitask approaches to cognitive training in cardiac surgery patients Use of antiplatelet agents in patients after myocardial infarction followed up in Moscow outpatient clinics. Results of a non-interventional prospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1