Examining nursing students’ perceptions of educational environment: Further validation of DREEM instrument

Thi Hue Hoang, Thi Hien Bui, Hong Anh Phan, Thi Hoa Huyen Nguyen, Lan Van Hoang
{"title":"Examining nursing students’ perceptions of educational environment: Further validation of DREEM instrument","authors":"Thi Hue Hoang, Thi Hien Bui, Hong Anh Phan, Thi Hoa Huyen Nguyen, Lan Van Hoang","doi":"10.54436/jns.2024.01.675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Educational environment is an essential foundation for the effective learning process of students, which in turn contributes to the success of a curriculum. The evaluation of educational environment from students’ perception has been considered as an indicator for the quality improvement of higher education. This study aimed to explore the Vietnamese nursing students’ perception of educational environment and identify internal consistency reliability of the Vietnamese version of the (Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure) DREEM instrument. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 102 second-year undergraduate nursing students in a medical university. An online survey, including the 50-item DREEM questionnaire, was used to obtain student’s perception of learning environment. Results: The overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the V-DREEM in this study was 0.95 and five sub-scales ranged from 0.74 to 0.85, demonstrating that the V-DREEM instrument has good internal consistency reliability for measurement. The overall score of DREEM was 143.89/200 (SD =17.50), indicating a positive educational environment perceived. Fifty-eight percent (58%) of the items were rated high score, however, there were aspects perceived as problematic including teaching methods (The teaching is too teacher-centered), student-teacher interactions (The students irritate and annoy the teachers), and students’ learning approaches (I feel able to ask the questions I want). Conclusion: The study results suggested the specific areas, including teaching methods, student-teacher interactions, and students’ learning approaches, that need more attention to enhance the educational environment for nursing students in Vietnam where the reform of nursing education has eventuated recently.","PeriodicalId":504442,"journal":{"name":"Tạp chí Khoa học Điều dưỡng","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tạp chí Khoa học Điều dưỡng","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54436/jns.2024.01.675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Educational environment is an essential foundation for the effective learning process of students, which in turn contributes to the success of a curriculum. The evaluation of educational environment from students’ perception has been considered as an indicator for the quality improvement of higher education. This study aimed to explore the Vietnamese nursing students’ perception of educational environment and identify internal consistency reliability of the Vietnamese version of the (Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure) DREEM instrument. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 102 second-year undergraduate nursing students in a medical university. An online survey, including the 50-item DREEM questionnaire, was used to obtain student’s perception of learning environment. Results: The overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the V-DREEM in this study was 0.95 and five sub-scales ranged from 0.74 to 0.85, demonstrating that the V-DREEM instrument has good internal consistency reliability for measurement. The overall score of DREEM was 143.89/200 (SD =17.50), indicating a positive educational environment perceived. Fifty-eight percent (58%) of the items were rated high score, however, there were aspects perceived as problematic including teaching methods (The teaching is too teacher-centered), student-teacher interactions (The students irritate and annoy the teachers), and students’ learning approaches (I feel able to ask the questions I want). Conclusion: The study results suggested the specific areas, including teaching methods, student-teacher interactions, and students’ learning approaches, that need more attention to enhance the educational environment for nursing students in Vietnam where the reform of nursing education has eventuated recently.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究护理专业学生对教育环境的看法:进一步验证 DREEM 工具
背景:教育环境是学生有效学习过程的重要基础,反过来也有助于课程的成功。从学生的感知来评价教育环境已被视为提高高等教育质量的一项指标。本研究旨在探讨越南护理专业学生对教育环境的感知,并确定越南语版(邓迪准备就绪教育环境测量)DREEM 工具的内部一致性可靠性。研究对象和方法:在一所医科大学的 102 名二年级护理本科生中开展了一项横断面研究。通过在线调查,包括 50 个项目的 DREEM 问卷,了解学生对学习环境的看法。结果显示本研究中,V-DREEM 的总 Cronbach's Alpha 系数为 0.95,五个分量表的 Cronbach's Alpha 系数在 0.74 至 0.85 之间,表明 V-DREEM 具有良好的内部一致性。DREEM 的总分为 143.89/200(SD =17.50),表明所感知的教育环境是积极的。58%的项目被评为高分,但也有一些方面被认为是有问题的,包括教学方法(教学过于以教师为中心)、师生互动(学生惹恼了教师)和学生的学习方法(我觉得我可以提出我想提出的问题)。结论研究结果表明,在越南,护理教育改革刚刚开始,需要更加关注教学方法、师生互动和学生学习方法等具体领域,以改善护理专业学生的教育环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thực trạng chăm sóc trẻ sau phẫu thuật thoát vị bẹn của điều dưỡng tại Bệnh viện Sản - Nhi tỉnh Quảng Ninh Môi trường làm việc của điều dưỡng và một số yếu tố liên quan tại một số bệnh viện công lập tại Hà Nội năm 2023 Chất lượng giấc ngủ của sinh viên điều dưỡng Trường Đại học Tây Nguyên Thực trạng mô hình bệnh tật người cao tuổi quận Ba Đình, Hà Nội năm 2023 Cải thiện hỗ trợ dinh dưỡng của điều dưỡng cho người bệnh ung thư: Protocol sử dụng phương pháp đồng thiết kế
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1