Conceptual review of symbolic cultural practices in children's racial/ethnic identity: Making room for mixed methods inquiry

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Family Relations Pub Date : 2023-12-26 DOI:10.1111/fare.12985
Amber B. Sansbury, Megan G. Stutesman, Divya Varier
{"title":"Conceptual review of symbolic cultural practices in children's racial/ethnic identity: Making room for mixed methods inquiry","authors":"Amber B. Sansbury,&nbsp;Megan G. Stutesman,&nbsp;Divya Varier","doi":"10.1111/fare.12985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Children are shaped by familial, cultural, societal, and environmental factors that impact development across multiple domains, contexts, and ecological systems. This conceptual review examines studies that address how symbolic cultural practices shape racial/ethnic identity development in early childhood (ages 3–6).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve key extant studies across qualitative (<i>n</i> = 4), quantitative (<i>n</i> = 5), and mixed (<i>n</i> = 3) methodological approaches that concern the use of symbolic cultural practices for early childhood racial/ethnic identity development were reviewed. Our review adopted an interdisciplinary approach, bringing perspectives from developmental psychology, family science, research methods, and education policy. We oriented our review to address the contributions of symbolic cultural practices to children's hope and happiness undergirded by their racial/ethnic identity development.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Studies across all methodological disciplines were useful in moving the field forward however, we argue that mixed methods studies are particularly consequential due to their ability to account for the highly contextualized experiences of healthy early childhood racial/ethnic socialization via symbolic cultural practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We also suggest that mixed methods lend more holistic explanations of connections between early childhood racial/ethnic socialization and symbolic cultural practices and promote mixed methods approaches as the most promising way to investigate the role of symbols in positive racial/ethnic socialization and identity development of young children in future research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Henceforth, we suggest that practitioners' understanding of the racial and ethnic identities of young children will be more holistic when approached from a mixed methods lens, and therefore, practitioner–child interactions will be more constructive.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.12985","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.12985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Children are shaped by familial, cultural, societal, and environmental factors that impact development across multiple domains, contexts, and ecological systems. This conceptual review examines studies that address how symbolic cultural practices shape racial/ethnic identity development in early childhood (ages 3–6).

Method

Twelve key extant studies across qualitative (n = 4), quantitative (n = 5), and mixed (n = 3) methodological approaches that concern the use of symbolic cultural practices for early childhood racial/ethnic identity development were reviewed. Our review adopted an interdisciplinary approach, bringing perspectives from developmental psychology, family science, research methods, and education policy. We oriented our review to address the contributions of symbolic cultural practices to children's hope and happiness undergirded by their racial/ethnic identity development.

Results

Studies across all methodological disciplines were useful in moving the field forward however, we argue that mixed methods studies are particularly consequential due to their ability to account for the highly contextualized experiences of healthy early childhood racial/ethnic socialization via symbolic cultural practices.

Conclusion

We also suggest that mixed methods lend more holistic explanations of connections between early childhood racial/ethnic socialization and symbolic cultural practices and promote mixed methods approaches as the most promising way to investigate the role of symbols in positive racial/ethnic socialization and identity development of young children in future research.

Implications

Henceforth, we suggest that practitioners' understanding of the racial and ethnic identities of young children will be more holistic when approached from a mixed methods lens, and therefore, practitioner–child interactions will be more constructive.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童种族/民族身份象征性文化实践的概念审查:为混合方法调查留出空间
儿童受家庭、文化、社会和环境因素的影响,这些因素影响着儿童在多个领域、环境和生态系统中的发展。本概念性综述探讨了有关象征性文化实践如何影响幼儿期(3-6 岁)种族/民族身份发展的研究。综述了涉及象征性文化实践用于幼儿期种族/民族身份发展的 12 项现存主要研究,研究方法包括定性研究(4 项)、定量研究(5 项)和混合研究(3 项)。我们的综述采用了跨学科的方法,从发展心理学、家庭科学、研究方法和教育政策等角度进行了分析。所有方法学科的研究都有助于推动该领域的发展,但是我们认为,混合方法研究尤其重要,因为它们能够通过象征性文化实践来解释健康的幼儿种族/民族社会化的高度情景化经验。我们还认为,混合方法能更全面地解释幼儿种族/民族社会化与象征性文化实践之间的联系,并提倡在未来的研究中将混合方法作为调查象征在幼儿积极的种族/民族社会化和身份发展中的作用的最有前途的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Minority stress and relationship satisfaction in same‐sex couples: A meta‐analysis Family bonds at risk: The spillover effects of workplace ostracism in the parent–child relationship Partnering with Reach Out and Read to understand families' experiences with books and their babies Community members as design partners: Codesign workshops of the families tackling tough times together program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1