What Can We Do to Improve the Health Policy-Making Cycle in the Islamic Republic of Iran with a Good Governance Approach? Recommendations for the Secretariat of the Supreme Council for Health and Food Security

Marziyeh Azadiyan, A. Vosoogh Moghaddam, Ali farhadi mahalli
{"title":"What Can We Do to Improve the Health Policy-Making Cycle in the Islamic Republic of Iran with a Good Governance Approach? Recommendations for the Secretariat of the Supreme Council for Health and Food Security","authors":"Marziyeh Azadiyan, A. Vosoogh Moghaddam, Ali farhadi mahalli","doi":"10.18502/jchr.v12i28.14502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The primary purpose of the health system is to promote equitable health in society. The aim of this study is to offer some recommendations for improving the Iranian health policy-making cycle with a good governance approach. Methods: The systematic review approach was employed to undertake this research. To track down articles published electronically between 2010 and 2021, a comprehensive search in the National Library's English databases, in December 2021, was conducted using the keywords such as public policy, policy, policy-making, health policy, good governance, health, and healthcare. In addition, the Persian equivalents of the aforementioned keywords were searched separately or in combination with Boolean operators (OR, AND) in databases such as Scopus, Ovid, Science Direct, Web of Knowledge, PubMed, IranMedex, Magiran, and SID to further pinpoint the desired articles. To evaluate and validate the quality of the selected articles, critical tools appropriate for the type of study were utilized (e.g., the SRQR tool for qualitative studies and the MMAT tool for mixed-methods studies), and finally, the research team conducted content analysis and categorized the findings. Results: Findings revealed that the health policy-making cycle is an extensive and intra-sectoral concern. Good governance in the health system results in specialized and individualized opportunities for better health and reduces inequality. To accomplish this purpose, it is necessary to emphasize cross-sectoral participation, social responsiveness, and transparent processes, and incorporate the viewpoints of experts and implementers of the health policy-making system. Furthermore, the health system's sovereignty and progress toward good governance should be evaluated, which results in effective policies and health justice. Conclusion: Considering the legal mission of the Supreme Council of Health and Food Security (the highest policy-making authority in the Ministry of Health), it is recommended that the council implement the practical recommendations of this research in actualizing and incorporating the good governance approach into the health policy-making cycle.","PeriodicalId":15521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health Research","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jchr.v12i28.14502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary purpose of the health system is to promote equitable health in society. The aim of this study is to offer some recommendations for improving the Iranian health policy-making cycle with a good governance approach. Methods: The systematic review approach was employed to undertake this research. To track down articles published electronically between 2010 and 2021, a comprehensive search in the National Library's English databases, in December 2021, was conducted using the keywords such as public policy, policy, policy-making, health policy, good governance, health, and healthcare. In addition, the Persian equivalents of the aforementioned keywords were searched separately or in combination with Boolean operators (OR, AND) in databases such as Scopus, Ovid, Science Direct, Web of Knowledge, PubMed, IranMedex, Magiran, and SID to further pinpoint the desired articles. To evaluate and validate the quality of the selected articles, critical tools appropriate for the type of study were utilized (e.g., the SRQR tool for qualitative studies and the MMAT tool for mixed-methods studies), and finally, the research team conducted content analysis and categorized the findings. Results: Findings revealed that the health policy-making cycle is an extensive and intra-sectoral concern. Good governance in the health system results in specialized and individualized opportunities for better health and reduces inequality. To accomplish this purpose, it is necessary to emphasize cross-sectoral participation, social responsiveness, and transparent processes, and incorporate the viewpoints of experts and implementers of the health policy-making system. Furthermore, the health system's sovereignty and progress toward good governance should be evaluated, which results in effective policies and health justice. Conclusion: Considering the legal mission of the Supreme Council of Health and Food Security (the highest policy-making authority in the Ministry of Health), it is recommended that the council implement the practical recommendations of this research in actualizing and incorporating the good governance approach into the health policy-making cycle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何以善治方法改善伊朗伊斯兰共和国的卫生政策制定周期?对最高卫生与粮食安全委员会秘书处的建议
背景:卫生系统的主要目的是促进社会公平健康。本研究旨在提出一些建议,以便以善治方法改进伊朗的卫生决策周期。 研究方法:本研究采用了系统综述法。为了追踪 2010 年至 2021 年期间以电子方式发表的文章,我们于 2021 年 12 月在国家图书馆的英文数据库中使用公共政策、政策、决策、卫生政策、善治、卫生和医疗保健等关键词进行了全面搜索。此外,还在 Scopus、Ovid、Science Direct、Web of Knowledge、PubMed、IranMedex、Magiran 和 SID 等数据库中分别或结合布尔运算符(OR、AND)搜索了上述关键词的波斯语对应词,以进一步确定所需的文章。为了评估和验证所选文章的质量,研究小组使用了适合研究类型的关键工具(例如,用于定性研究的 SRQR 工具和用于混合方法研究的 MMAT 工具),最后,研究小组对研究结果进行了内容分析和分类。 研究结果研究结果表明,卫生政策制定周期是一个广泛的、部门内部的问题。卫生系统的良好治理为改善健康状况提供了专业化和个性化的机会,并减少了不平等现象。为实现这一目的,有必要强调跨部门参与、社会响应和过程透明,并纳入卫生决策系统专家和执行者的观点。此外,还应评估卫生系统的主权和在实现善治方面取得的进展,从而制定有效的政策,实现卫生公正。 结论:考虑到卫生和食品安全最高委员会(卫生部的最高决策机构)的法律使命,建议该委员会在将善治方法付诸实践并纳入卫生决策周期时,落实本研究提出的切实可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of the Intention to Perform Preventive Behaviors Against the Occurrence of Breast Cancer Recognizing and Describing the Factors Affecting the Design of the Innovation Ecosystem Model in the Field of Health with an Emphasis on the Role of E-Government Institutionalization of Sports for All in Iranian Families Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of COVID-19 Preventive Measures Questionnaire in Radiation Therapy Center, Yazd, Iran Survival Analysis of Ovarian Cancer Patients in Yazd City, Central part of Iran, 1999-2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1