Schimpflug versus Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography after Epi-on Corneal Cross Linking in Keratoconus

Hoda Mohammed, Hamdy El-gazzar, Taher K Eleiwa, Ahmed Mostafa Bayoumy
{"title":"Schimpflug versus Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography after Epi-on Corneal Cross Linking in Keratoconus","authors":"Hoda Mohammed, Hamdy El-gazzar, Taher K Eleiwa, Ahmed Mostafa Bayoumy","doi":"10.21608/bmfj.2023.249188.1952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The measurement of corneal thickness is a crucial factor in evaluating keratoconus and its potential treatment methods, such as collagen cross-linking (CXL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-device reliability in the corneal pachymetry following epi-on CXL using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and Scheimpflug tomography. Methods: This was across-sectional observational study that involved patients diagnosed with keratoconus and had undergone epi-on cross linking. Patients were subjected to follow-up examinations and corneal imaging with Pentacam (Oculyzer) and AS-OCT (Optovue). The inter-device reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha. Results: 72 of eyes (36 patients), aged (18-43) years with 27 (75%) males, 9(25%) females were included in the study. Regarding central corneal thickness (CCT) pentacam measured a mean of 519.18µm, versus 507.83 µm using AS-OCT, P value < 0.001. Thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) measured 511.61µm with pentacam versus 491.61 µm using AS-OCT, P value <0.001. On evaluating the agreement between pentacam and AS-OCT in measuring central corneal thickness, ICC ranged from 0.82 to 0.984, which reflected excellent reliability. Cronbach alpha was 0.975 demonstrated excellent agreement. For TCT, ICC ranged from 0.15 to 0.979, which reflected good reliability. Cronbach alpha was 0.972 demonstrated excellent agreement. Conclusion: Based on the results of corneal pachymetry, after epi-on CXL, both AS-OCT and pentacam demonstrates comparable measurements with excellent inter-device reliability. However, it is worth noting that the pentacam appears to slightly overestimates the CCT and TCT.","PeriodicalId":503219,"journal":{"name":"Benha Medical Journal","volume":"259 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2023.249188.1952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The measurement of corneal thickness is a crucial factor in evaluating keratoconus and its potential treatment methods, such as collagen cross-linking (CXL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-device reliability in the corneal pachymetry following epi-on CXL using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and Scheimpflug tomography. Methods: This was across-sectional observational study that involved patients diagnosed with keratoconus and had undergone epi-on cross linking. Patients were subjected to follow-up examinations and corneal imaging with Pentacam (Oculyzer) and AS-OCT (Optovue). The inter-device reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha. Results: 72 of eyes (36 patients), aged (18-43) years with 27 (75%) males, 9(25%) females were included in the study. Regarding central corneal thickness (CCT) pentacam measured a mean of 519.18µm, versus 507.83 µm using AS-OCT, P value < 0.001. Thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) measured 511.61µm with pentacam versus 491.61 µm using AS-OCT, P value <0.001. On evaluating the agreement between pentacam and AS-OCT in measuring central corneal thickness, ICC ranged from 0.82 to 0.984, which reflected excellent reliability. Cronbach alpha was 0.975 demonstrated excellent agreement. For TCT, ICC ranged from 0.15 to 0.979, which reflected good reliability. Cronbach alpha was 0.972 demonstrated excellent agreement. Conclusion: Based on the results of corneal pachymetry, after epi-on CXL, both AS-OCT and pentacam demonstrates comparable measurements with excellent inter-device reliability. However, it is worth noting that the pentacam appears to slightly overestimates the CCT and TCT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
角膜塑形镜与角膜交联术后前段光学相干断层扫描的比较
背景:测量角膜厚度是评估角膜炎及其潜在治疗方法(如胶原交联(CXL))的关键因素。本研究旨在利用前段光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)和Scheimpflug断层扫描评估外显子CXL术后角膜厚度测量的设备间可靠性。方法:这是一项横断面观察性研究,研究对象是确诊为角膜炎并接受了外显子交叉连接术的患者。患者接受随访检查,并使用 Pentacam(Oculyzer)和 AS-OCT (Optovue)进行角膜成像。使用类内相关系数(ICC)和克朗巴赫α评估了设备间的可靠性。结果显示研究共纳入 72 只眼睛(36 名患者),年龄(18-43)岁,其中男性 27 名(75%),女性 9 名(25%)。在中央角膜厚度(CCT)方面,pentacam 测得的平均值为 519.18 微米,而 AS-OCT 测得的平均值为 507.83 微米,P 值小于 0.001。用 pentacam 测得的最薄角膜厚度(TCT)为 511.61 微米,而用 AS-OCT 测得的厚度为 491.61 微米,P 值小于 0.001。在评估 pentacam 和 AS-OCT 测量中央角膜厚度的一致性时,ICC 在 0.82 至 0.984 之间,反映了极佳的可靠性。Cronbach alpha 为 0.975,显示了极佳的一致性。对于 TCT,ICC 在 0.15 至 0.979 之间,反映了良好的可靠性。Cronbach alpha 为 0.972,显示了极好的一致性。结论根据角膜厚度测量的结果,外显子 CXL 后,AS-OCT 和 pentacam 的测量结果具有可比性,设备间的可靠性极佳。但值得注意的是,pentacam 似乎略微高估了 CCT 和 TCT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease on Health-Related Quality of Life Comparing Fair Control of Hyperglycemia contrary to Intensive Control in Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Procedure Comparison of the Onset Time between 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound‑Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Clinical Trial Intramedullary Nailing Versus Minmally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) in Management of Distal Tibial Fractures Correlation between serum estrogen level and endometrial histology in cases of fibroid uterus in peri-menopausal peroid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1