Student-Teacher Level of Statistical Reasoning Ability Reviewed by Apos Theory (Action, Process, Object, Schema)

PRISMA Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.35194/jp.v12i2.3139
Nayla N Ghassaniy, Aan Hasanah, Wahyudin Wahyudin
{"title":"Student-Teacher Level of Statistical Reasoning Ability Reviewed by Apos Theory (Action, Process, Object, Schema)","authors":"Nayla N Ghassaniy, Aan Hasanah, Wahyudin Wahyudin","doi":"10.35194/jp.v12i2.3139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In learning statistics, there is the term statistical reasoning. Statistical reasoning arises because of the opinion that learning statistics using a traditional approach does not lead students to have statistical reasoning abilities or to think statistically. There are four statistical reasoning levels: idiosyncratic, transitional, quantitative, and analytical. Student-teachers must understand fundamental statistical concepts more deeply to develop statistical reasoning abilities. The mental construction of a statistical concept can be analyzed using APOS (Action, Process, Object, Schema) theory. Through the APOS theory, researchers can determine individual understanding of statistical concepts that cause individuals to reason or draw reasonable conclusions based on the statistical information obtained. This study aims to analyze the interrelationships and make conjectures regarding the level of statistical reasoning ability based on the APOS theory. The research subjects are. 19 informants. The research results obtained four conjectures, namely. Students at the idiosyncratic level are in the action stage; students at the transitional stage are in the action, process, or object stage; students at the quantitative stage are in the process or object stage; lastly, students at the analytical are in the schema stage.","PeriodicalId":503262,"journal":{"name":"PRISMA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRISMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v12i2.3139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In learning statistics, there is the term statistical reasoning. Statistical reasoning arises because of the opinion that learning statistics using a traditional approach does not lead students to have statistical reasoning abilities or to think statistically. There are four statistical reasoning levels: idiosyncratic, transitional, quantitative, and analytical. Student-teachers must understand fundamental statistical concepts more deeply to develop statistical reasoning abilities. The mental construction of a statistical concept can be analyzed using APOS (Action, Process, Object, Schema) theory. Through the APOS theory, researchers can determine individual understanding of statistical concepts that cause individuals to reason or draw reasonable conclusions based on the statistical information obtained. This study aims to analyze the interrelationships and make conjectures regarding the level of statistical reasoning ability based on the APOS theory. The research subjects are. 19 informants. The research results obtained four conjectures, namely. Students at the idiosyncratic level are in the action stage; students at the transitional stage are in the action, process, or object stage; students at the quantitative stage are in the process or object stage; lastly, students at the analytical are in the schema stage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按 Apos 理论(动作、过程、对象、模式)评定的师生统计推理能力水平
在统计学习中,有一个术语叫统计推理。统计推理产生的原因是,有人认为用传统方法学习统计并不能培养学生的统计推理能力或统计思维。统计推理分为四个层次:特异性推理、过渡性推理、定量推理和分析性推理。学生教师必须更深入地理解基本统计概念,才能培养统计推理能力。统计概念的心理建构可以用 APOS(行动、过程、对象、模式)理论来分析。通过 APOS 理论,研究人员可以确定个体对统计概念的理解,从而根据所获得的统计信息进行推理或得出合理的结论。本研究旨在基于 APOS 理论,分析统计推理能力水平的相互关系并做出猜想。研究对象包括19 名信息提供者。研究结果得到四个猜想,即处于特异水平的学生处于行动阶段;处于过渡阶段的学生处于行动、过程或对象阶段;处于定量阶段的学生处于过程或对象阶段;最后,处于分析水平的学生处于图式阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analisis Miskonsepsi Matematika Siswa pada Materi Aljabar Berdasarkan Tes Diagnostik Three Tier Multiple Choice Pengaruh Model PjBL Berbasis TPACK dan Gaya Kognitif terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif pada Materi Pecahan Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar Analisis Pemahaman Konseptual Perta Didik Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender Student-Teacher Level of Statistical Reasoning Ability Reviewed by Apos Theory (Action, Process, Object, Schema)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1