Changes in semi-natural grassland distribution in relation to common agricultural policy 2014–2020 area-based payments in Latvia

S. Rūsiņa, Gundega Vacere, P. Lakovskis, Linda Ievina
{"title":"Changes in semi-natural grassland distribution in relation to common agricultural policy 2014–2020 area-based payments in Latvia","authors":"S. Rūsiņa, Gundega Vacere, P. Lakovskis, Linda Ievina","doi":"10.22616/rrd.29.2023.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Semi-natural grasslands (SNG) are essential in the context of farmland biodiversity. The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), on the other hand, is an important tool for the continuation of the management of semi-natural grasslands. Explicit knowledge on the pattern of grassland area changes is important to foster a more effective use of CAP for grassland biodiversity conservation. Our aim was to determine the habitat-specific changes in the distribution of Latvian SNG across different management regimes. Based on state-owned geospatial data of SNG distribution in 2014 and 2022, we assessed changes in semi-natural grassland areas over nearly ten years by analyzing grassland management and spatial distribution including areas inside and outside the Natura 2000 network. The spatial distribution of SNG remained similar in both periods. Eastern Latvia retained the highest share of SNG while the central part showed the most pronounced increase in new localities of SNG due to extensive habitat mapping carried out in recent years. Abandonment appeared as a more important threat to SNG in the Natura 2000 network and more profoundly to unproductive habitat types while transformation into arable land and grassland intensification was a considerable threat to SNG outside the network and to more productive habitat types. We suggest that agri-environment schemes should address the different needs of SNG in the Natura 2000 network and outside it.","PeriodicalId":503741,"journal":{"name":"Research for Rural Development 2023 : annual 29th international scientific conference proceedings","volume":"850 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research for Rural Development 2023 : annual 29th international scientific conference proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22616/rrd.29.2023.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Semi-natural grasslands (SNG) are essential in the context of farmland biodiversity. The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), on the other hand, is an important tool for the continuation of the management of semi-natural grasslands. Explicit knowledge on the pattern of grassland area changes is important to foster a more effective use of CAP for grassland biodiversity conservation. Our aim was to determine the habitat-specific changes in the distribution of Latvian SNG across different management regimes. Based on state-owned geospatial data of SNG distribution in 2014 and 2022, we assessed changes in semi-natural grassland areas over nearly ten years by analyzing grassland management and spatial distribution including areas inside and outside the Natura 2000 network. The spatial distribution of SNG remained similar in both periods. Eastern Latvia retained the highest share of SNG while the central part showed the most pronounced increase in new localities of SNG due to extensive habitat mapping carried out in recent years. Abandonment appeared as a more important threat to SNG in the Natura 2000 network and more profoundly to unproductive habitat types while transformation into arable land and grassland intensification was a considerable threat to SNG outside the network and to more productive habitat types. We suggest that agri-environment schemes should address the different needs of SNG in the Natura 2000 network and outside it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与拉脱维亚 2014-2020 年共同农业政策按面积付费有关的半天然草地分布变化
半天然草地 (SNG) 对农田生物多样性至关重要。另一方面,共同农业政策(CAP)是继续管理半自然草地的重要工具。明确了解草地面积变化的模式对于更有效地利用共同农业政策保护草地生物多样性非常重要。我们的目标是确定拉脱维亚半天然草地在不同管理制度下的特定生境分布变化。基于 2014 年和 2022 年半自然草原分布的国有地理空间数据,我们通过分析草原管理和空间分布(包括 Natura 2000 网络内外的区域),评估了近十年来半自然草原面积的变化。在这两个时期,半天然草地的空间分布保持相似。拉脱维亚东部保留的SNG比例最高,而中部由于近年来开展了广泛的栖息地测绘,SNG新地点的增加最为明显。弃耕对自然2000网络中的SNG构成了更大的威胁,对非生产性生境类型的威胁也更大,而变成耕地和草地集约化则对网络外的SNG和生产性较强的生境类型构成了相当大的威胁。我们建议,农业环境计划应满足自然 2000 网络内外 SNG 的不同需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flue gas analysis of apple and grey alder wood pellets in a meat smokehouse chamber The vitality of Taxus Baccata L. in forest stands in Slitere National Park, Latvia Carbon stock of decidious forests on organic soils in Latvia Changes in semi-natural grassland distribution in relation to common agricultural policy 2014–2020 area-based payments in Latvia Hyperspectral imaging for early detection of foliar fungal diseases on small grain cereals: a minireview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1