ASTM and ISO standards in U.S. legal language services

C. Mellinger, Teresa C. Salazar, Aimee K. Benavides
{"title":"ASTM and ISO standards in U.S. legal language services","authors":"C. Mellinger, Teresa C. Salazar, Aimee K. Benavides","doi":"10.1075/dt.00005.mel","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, legal language services are shaped by both de jure and de facto standards, which encompass not only the professional profile of court interpreters but also the provision of legal translation and interpreting services. This article investigates the potential influence of ASTM and ISO standards on current language services implementations in U.S. court settings in light of the current configuration of de jure and de facto standards. Specific emphasis is placed on the utility of consensus-based standards such as ASTM and ISO due to the unique configuration of language services, particularly given procurement and bidding practices, which complicate the current legal T&I landscape. Possible avenues for integration of ASTM and ISO standards are explored in light of infrastructure-specific as well as translator- and interpreter-specific requirements. The article concludes with a discussion of the compatibility of standards with current practices in the U.S. legal T&I sector.","PeriodicalId":505924,"journal":{"name":"The Role of ISO/TC 37 Standards for Translators, Interpreters, Terminologists and Beyond","volume":"430 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Role of ISO/TC 37 Standards for Translators, Interpreters, Terminologists and Beyond","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/dt.00005.mel","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, legal language services are shaped by both de jure and de facto standards, which encompass not only the professional profile of court interpreters but also the provision of legal translation and interpreting services. This article investigates the potential influence of ASTM and ISO standards on current language services implementations in U.S. court settings in light of the current configuration of de jure and de facto standards. Specific emphasis is placed on the utility of consensus-based standards such as ASTM and ISO due to the unique configuration of language services, particularly given procurement and bidding practices, which complicate the current legal T&I landscape. Possible avenues for integration of ASTM and ISO standards are explored in light of infrastructure-specific as well as translator- and interpreter-specific requirements. The article concludes with a discussion of the compatibility of standards with current practices in the U.S. legal T&I sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国法律语言服务中的 ASTM 和 ISO 标准
在美国,法律语言服务是由法律标准和事实标准共同决定的,其中不仅包括法庭口译员的职业形象,还包括法律笔译和口译服务的提供。本文根据当前法律标准和事实标准的配置情况,研究了 ASTM 和 ISO 标准对美国法院当前语言服务实施的潜在影响。文章特别强调了基于共识的标准(如 ASTM 和 ISO)的效用,因为语言服务的独特配置,尤其是采购和招标实践,使当前的法律 T&I 情况变得复杂。文章根据基础设施以及笔译员和口译员的具体要求,探讨了整合 ASTM 和 ISO 标准的可能途径。文章最后讨论了标准与美国法律翻译和信息部门当前实践的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ASTM and ISO standards in U.S. legal language services Terminology standards and their relevance for legal interpreters and translators An in-context overview of legal translator competences, qualifications and other professional requirements set in the ISO 20771:2020 Legal translation – Requirements standard ISO standards for terminology resources management The impact of ISO/TC 37 standards on technical communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1