The social protection aspect of the subjective assessment of the material security of large and foster families: the results of a comparative qualitative study

I. Karpikova
{"title":"The social protection aspect of the subjective assessment of the material security of large and foster families: the results of a comparative qualitative study","authors":"I. Karpikova","doi":"10.25136/2409-7144.2023.12.69372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern demographic trends in the field of fertility have led to increased state attention in recent years to issues of social protection of motherhood and childhood, social support for families with children. This trend has resulted in a significant increase in the list and volume of social benefits and other social benefits, and an increase in the number of their recipients. The issue of evaluating the effectiveness of measures taken by the state is becoming increasingly relevant, not only from the standpoint of quantitative statistical indicators, but also by studying the opinion of beneficiaries. The article presents the results of a study aimed at determining subjective assessments of the material security of families with children in connection with their receipt of social protection and support measures. The object of the study is families with children belonging to the categories of large and foster families. By the method of in-depth qualitative interviews, representatives of households of 10 large families and 10 foster families living in large and small cities of the Irkutsk region were interviewed. The author has revealed significant differences in assessments between representatives of different categories of families with children. Large families express dissatisfaction with the following positions: the availability and amount of social benefits; the amount of benefits and the complexity of obtaining them. In conditions of dependence of social benefits on the size of the per capita income of family members, the status of having many children ceases to play a social protection role, not being a significant factor in ensuring the material well-being of the family. On the contrary, foster families note: a significant increase in the amount of payments for the maintenance of foster children and the remuneration of foster parents; an increase in the list and volume of additional social support measures. These measures have made it possible to increase the level of financial security of foster families. Foster parents expressed the need to take into account the needs of foster children not only of a minimal nature, but also related to their development, health maintenance, and additional education. The results obtained made it possible to formulate approaches to solving problems of a social protection nature of the considered categories of families with children. For foster families, it is important to gradually expand measures of social support for foster children based on monitoring needs. In relation to large families, it is necessary to radically change the social protection mechanisms based on the recognition of the status of having many children, which gives the right to receive additional social guarantees.","PeriodicalId":503817,"journal":{"name":"Социодинамика","volume":"50 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Социодинамика","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7144.2023.12.69372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern demographic trends in the field of fertility have led to increased state attention in recent years to issues of social protection of motherhood and childhood, social support for families with children. This trend has resulted in a significant increase in the list and volume of social benefits and other social benefits, and an increase in the number of their recipients. The issue of evaluating the effectiveness of measures taken by the state is becoming increasingly relevant, not only from the standpoint of quantitative statistical indicators, but also by studying the opinion of beneficiaries. The article presents the results of a study aimed at determining subjective assessments of the material security of families with children in connection with their receipt of social protection and support measures. The object of the study is families with children belonging to the categories of large and foster families. By the method of in-depth qualitative interviews, representatives of households of 10 large families and 10 foster families living in large and small cities of the Irkutsk region were interviewed. The author has revealed significant differences in assessments between representatives of different categories of families with children. Large families express dissatisfaction with the following positions: the availability and amount of social benefits; the amount of benefits and the complexity of obtaining them. In conditions of dependence of social benefits on the size of the per capita income of family members, the status of having many children ceases to play a social protection role, not being a significant factor in ensuring the material well-being of the family. On the contrary, foster families note: a significant increase in the amount of payments for the maintenance of foster children and the remuneration of foster parents; an increase in the list and volume of additional social support measures. These measures have made it possible to increase the level of financial security of foster families. Foster parents expressed the need to take into account the needs of foster children not only of a minimal nature, but also related to their development, health maintenance, and additional education. The results obtained made it possible to formulate approaches to solving problems of a social protection nature of the considered categories of families with children. For foster families, it is important to gradually expand measures of social support for foster children based on monitoring needs. In relation to large families, it is necessary to radically change the social protection mechanisms based on the recognition of the status of having many children, which gives the right to receive additional social guarantees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大家庭和寄养家庭物质保障主观评估中的社会保护问题:定性比较研究的结果
近年来,生育领域的现代人口趋势促使国家更加关注对母亲和儿童的社会保护问题以及对有子女家庭的社会支助问题。这一趋势导致社会福利和其他社会福利的清单和数量大幅增加,受益者人数也随之增加。评估国家采取的措施是否有效的问题变得越来越重要,不仅要从量化统计指标的角度进行评估,还要研究受益人的意见。本文介绍了一项旨在确定有子女家庭在接受社会保护和支助措施时对物质保障的主观评价的研究结果。研究对象是有子女的大家庭和寄养家庭。通过深入定性访谈的方法,对居住在伊尔库茨克州大小城市的 10 个大家庭和 10 个寄养家庭的家庭代表进行了访谈。作者发现不同类别的有子女家庭代表在评价方面存在明显差异。大家庭对以下情况表示不满:社会福利的可获得性和数量;福利的数量和获得福利的复杂性。在社会补助金取决于家庭成员人均收入的条件下,多子女的状况不再起社会保护作用,也不是确保家庭物质福利的重要因素。相反,寄养家庭注意到:寄养儿童的抚养费和寄养父母的报酬大幅增加;额外社会支助措施的清单和数量增加。这些措施提高了寄养家庭的经济保障水平。寄养父母表示有必要考虑到寄养儿童的需求,不仅是最基本的需求,还包括与他们的 发展、健康维护和额外教育有关的需求。所取得的结果使我们有可能制定出解决所考虑的各类有子女家庭的社会保护问题的方 法。对于寄养家庭来说,重要的是根据监测需要逐步扩大对寄养儿童的社会支助措施。对于多子女家庭,有必要在承认多子女地位的基础上,从根本上改变社会保护机制,使其有权获得额外的社会保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generation Z media consumption practices in social media The attitude of the Tatars of the Kirov region (Russia) to religious rites Family traditions of the titular ethnic groups of Southern Siberia (according to the 2022 study) Features of career trajectories of graduates of Altai universities (using the example of a sociological study in Barnaul) Understanding the Tourist Gaze in John Urry's Sociological Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1