The outcome in critically ill patients admitted for thoracic trauma – A single center analysis over one year

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.2478/amma-2023-0046
Oana-Elena Branea, Konrád Ottó Kiss, Mihai Pui, Vlad Dimitrie Cehan, Oana Frandes, A. Vlad, Ioan Alexandru Branea, Andrei Cristian Fulop, Monica Chis, A. Lazar
{"title":"The outcome in critically ill patients admitted for thoracic trauma – A single center analysis over one year","authors":"Oana-Elena Branea, Konrád Ottó Kiss, Mihai Pui, Vlad Dimitrie Cehan, Oana Frandes, A. Vlad, Ioan Alexandru Branea, Andrei Cristian Fulop, Monica Chis, A. Lazar","doi":"10.2478/amma-2023-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: The main objective of the current study was to examine the outcome of critically ill patients in relation to clinical and thoracic injuries. The secondary objectives were to assess the role of CT in the evaluation of the diaphragm and to provide an analysis of prognostic abilities with respect to diaphragm changes. Methods: This single-center retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in the ICU of Târgu Mureș County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Romania. This study identified 52 critically ill blunted or penetrating chest trauma patients admitted to the ICU from 01 January 2021 to 31 December 2021. CT scan was used to identify thorax injuries and diaphragm thickness. The outcome of all patients was analyzed. Results: Most of the patients experienced traffic accidents (44.23%) or falls (26.93%). The predominant characteristics associated with chest trauma were rib fractures (92.30%), lung contusions (63.50%), and pneumothorax (53.80%). The most common injury seen in the study was rib fractures, accounting for 92.30% of cases. This was followed by lung contusions, which were present in 63.50% of patients, and pneumothorax, which occurred in 53.80% of cases. It was examined ROC AUC for thickness of the right and the left diaphragm and severity scores. When assessing the thickness of the diaphragm in deceased and survivors, no statistically significant differences were found. Conclusion: Although no significant differences were found regarding the prognosis between the survivors and the deceased, diaphragm thickness might potentially serve as a predictor for the severity of the injury.","PeriodicalId":36282,"journal":{"name":"Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2023-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The main objective of the current study was to examine the outcome of critically ill patients in relation to clinical and thoracic injuries. The secondary objectives were to assess the role of CT in the evaluation of the diaphragm and to provide an analysis of prognostic abilities with respect to diaphragm changes. Methods: This single-center retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in the ICU of Târgu Mureș County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Romania. This study identified 52 critically ill blunted or penetrating chest trauma patients admitted to the ICU from 01 January 2021 to 31 December 2021. CT scan was used to identify thorax injuries and diaphragm thickness. The outcome of all patients was analyzed. Results: Most of the patients experienced traffic accidents (44.23%) or falls (26.93%). The predominant characteristics associated with chest trauma were rib fractures (92.30%), lung contusions (63.50%), and pneumothorax (53.80%). The most common injury seen in the study was rib fractures, accounting for 92.30% of cases. This was followed by lung contusions, which were present in 63.50% of patients, and pneumothorax, which occurred in 53.80% of cases. It was examined ROC AUC for thickness of the right and the left diaphragm and severity scores. When assessing the thickness of the diaphragm in deceased and survivors, no statistically significant differences were found. Conclusion: Although no significant differences were found regarding the prognosis between the survivors and the deceased, diaphragm thickness might potentially serve as a predictor for the severity of the injury.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因胸部创伤入院的危重病人的预后--一个单一中心的一年分析
摘要 目的:本研究的主要目的是根据临床和胸腔损伤情况检查重症患者的预后。次要目标是评估 CT 在评估膈肌方面的作用,并分析与膈肌变化有关的预后能力。方法:这项单中心回顾性观察队列研究在罗马尼亚 Târgu Mureș 县临床急诊医院重症监护室进行。该研究确定了 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间入住重症监护室的 52 名钝性或穿透性胸部创伤重症患者。CT 扫描用于确定胸部损伤和膈肌厚度。对所有患者的治疗结果进行了分析。结果大多数患者经历过交通事故(44.23%)或跌倒(26.93%)。胸部创伤的主要特征是肋骨骨折(92.30%)、肺挫伤(63.50%)和气胸(53.80%)。研究中最常见的损伤是肋骨骨折,占 92.30%。其次是肺挫伤(占 63.50%)和气胸(占 53.80%)。对左右膈肌厚度和严重程度评分的 ROC AUC 进行了研究。在评估死亡者和存活者的横膈膜厚度时,没有发现统计学上的显著差异。结论虽然在预后方面,幸存者和死者之间没有发现明显的差异,但横膈膜厚度有可能成为损伤严重程度的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica
Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nucleostemin and p-STAT3 as early diagnostic potential markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma Packed cell volume and its relation to obesity, gender and smoking status Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm – Management of an extremely rare case of pancreatic tumor in a young patient Psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and their combination in the treatment of major depressive disorder: How well are we making use of available therapies? Histological patterns of testicular biopsy in patients with azoospermia: single-institution experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1