INNOVATIVE ASPECTS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF SMES: EXPERIENCE OF THE EU AND UKRAINE

Vitalii Stoika, Serhii Stoika, Olena Harnyk
{"title":"INNOVATIVE ASPECTS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF SMES: EXPERIENCE OF THE EU AND UKRAINE","authors":"Vitalii Stoika, Serhii Stoika, Olena Harnyk","doi":"10.30525/2661-5150/2023-3-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovations and their use in the competitive struggle, both at the level of national economies and at the level of enterprises, are undoubtedly becoming the main driver of development in modern conditions. This goal can only be achieved through a profound technological re-equipment of scientific, technical and productive potential, which requires an intensification of investment activity in the economy. The latter is a necessary condition for ensuring sustainable growth and strengthening the competitive advantages of national economies in global markets through their modernisation and technical reconstruction. That is why, at the present stage, the only way to develop the world economy to meet the global challenges and increase the level of international competitiveness is to create an innovation and investment economy. However, many factors hinder such development in European countries, and certainly in Ukraine. It is particularly difficult to implement innovations in the small and medium-sized business sector. The reasons for this gap include the low interest of the financial sector and large companies in financing small and microenterprises, underdeveloped mechanisms for cross-sectoral capital flows, and weak levers to stimulate the introduction of high-technology, high-cost innovations for small and microenterprises. As a result, innovation does not become a means of enhancing the competitiveness of the economy. The purpose of the article is to summarise theoretical approaches and practical aspects of determining methods and instruments of regulation of economic development of innovations in the sector of small and microbusinesses in Ukraine. The article is also aimed at a comparative analysis of foreign experience of state regulation of modernisation transformations in the economy on an innovative basis and at making proposals for their implementation in Ukraine. This study uses the methodology of interdisciplinary science. The theoretical underpinning is based on the content analysis of research by scholars from different countries, the integration of interdisciplinary knowledge and the integration of heterogeneous characteristics into one system. This has allowed certain results to be formulated, substantiated and conclusions to be drawn. In particular, the comparative analysis of the development of innovation in SMEs, the identification of trends in the development of small and microenterprises in Ukraine under martial law, the determination of the role of innovation in the post-war economic recovery of Ukraine, and the consideration of methods of regulating the implementation of innovation in SMEs in the EU. The global paradigm of the European Union's \"new innovation perspective\" is that by implementing active policies to promote innovation and new knowledge, EU member states are contributing to the fact that regional policy, which used to be redistributive in nature, is increasingly taking on the features of a structural innovation policy. The synergistic effect is achieved by combining the member states' own national innovation strategies and their participation in supranational, pan-European innovation programmes. At the same time, a feature of recent years is that the EU supranational institutions prefer to assist regions not through direct funding, but by motivating the development of their innovation infrastructure as part of the development of innovation policy. The development of innovative activities should become a tool for strengthening cooperation with other countries and Ukraine's entry into the global innovation community. Participation in international innovation programmes, projects and conferences will facilitate the exchange of experience and technologies between countries, as well as attract foreign investors to Ukraine. Cooperation between the state, business and research institutions will be the basis for creating an innovative ecosystem in Ukraine. Efficient use of national resources and potential, attraction of talented professionals and start-ups, which will contribute to economic development and improve living standards, will ensure the creation of a favourable environment for innovation activities of small and microbusinesses.","PeriodicalId":34091,"journal":{"name":"Three Seas Economic Journal","volume":"67 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Three Seas Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2023-3-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovations and their use in the competitive struggle, both at the level of national economies and at the level of enterprises, are undoubtedly becoming the main driver of development in modern conditions. This goal can only be achieved through a profound technological re-equipment of scientific, technical and productive potential, which requires an intensification of investment activity in the economy. The latter is a necessary condition for ensuring sustainable growth and strengthening the competitive advantages of national economies in global markets through their modernisation and technical reconstruction. That is why, at the present stage, the only way to develop the world economy to meet the global challenges and increase the level of international competitiveness is to create an innovation and investment economy. However, many factors hinder such development in European countries, and certainly in Ukraine. It is particularly difficult to implement innovations in the small and medium-sized business sector. The reasons for this gap include the low interest of the financial sector and large companies in financing small and microenterprises, underdeveloped mechanisms for cross-sectoral capital flows, and weak levers to stimulate the introduction of high-technology, high-cost innovations for small and microenterprises. As a result, innovation does not become a means of enhancing the competitiveness of the economy. The purpose of the article is to summarise theoretical approaches and practical aspects of determining methods and instruments of regulation of economic development of innovations in the sector of small and microbusinesses in Ukraine. The article is also aimed at a comparative analysis of foreign experience of state regulation of modernisation transformations in the economy on an innovative basis and at making proposals for their implementation in Ukraine. This study uses the methodology of interdisciplinary science. The theoretical underpinning is based on the content analysis of research by scholars from different countries, the integration of interdisciplinary knowledge and the integration of heterogeneous characteristics into one system. This has allowed certain results to be formulated, substantiated and conclusions to be drawn. In particular, the comparative analysis of the development of innovation in SMEs, the identification of trends in the development of small and microenterprises in Ukraine under martial law, the determination of the role of innovation in the post-war economic recovery of Ukraine, and the consideration of methods of regulating the implementation of innovation in SMEs in the EU. The global paradigm of the European Union's "new innovation perspective" is that by implementing active policies to promote innovation and new knowledge, EU member states are contributing to the fact that regional policy, which used to be redistributive in nature, is increasingly taking on the features of a structural innovation policy. The synergistic effect is achieved by combining the member states' own national innovation strategies and their participation in supranational, pan-European innovation programmes. At the same time, a feature of recent years is that the EU supranational institutions prefer to assist regions not through direct funding, but by motivating the development of their innovation infrastructure as part of the development of innovation policy. The development of innovative activities should become a tool for strengthening cooperation with other countries and Ukraine's entry into the global innovation community. Participation in international innovation programmes, projects and conferences will facilitate the exchange of experience and technologies between countries, as well as attract foreign investors to Ukraine. Cooperation between the state, business and research institutions will be the basis for creating an innovative ecosystem in Ukraine. Efficient use of national resources and potential, attraction of talented professionals and start-ups, which will contribute to economic development and improve living standards, will ensure the creation of a favourable environment for innovation activities of small and microbusinesses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小型企业经济发展的创新方面:欧盟和乌克兰的经验
无论是在国家经济层面还是在企业层面,创新及其在竞争中的应用无疑正在成为现代条件下发展的主要动力。要实现这一目标,就必须对科学、技术和生产潜力进行深层次的技术再装备,这就需要加强经济领域的投资活动。后者是确保可持续增长和通过现代化和技术重建加强国民经济在全球市场上的竞争优势的必要条件。因此,在现阶段,发展世界经济以应对全球挑战和提高国际竞争力的唯一途径就是建立创新和投资经济。然而,许多因素阻碍了欧洲国家,当然也包括乌克兰的这种发展。在中小型企业部门实施创新尤其困难。造成这种差距的原因包括:金融部门和大公司对小型和微型企业的融资兴趣不高;跨部门资本流动机制不发达;刺激小型和微型企业引进高技术、高成本创新的杠杆作用不强。因此,创新并没有成为提高经济竞争力的手段。本文旨在总结乌克兰小型和微型企业部门创新经济发展调节方法和手段的理论方法和实践方面。文章还旨在比较分析国外在创新基础上对经济现代化转型进行国家调控的经验,并为其在乌克兰的实施提出建议。本研究采用了跨学科科学方法。其理论基础是对不同国家学者的研究内容进行分析,整合跨学科知识并将异质特征纳入一个体系。这使得某些成果得以形成、证实并得出结论。特别是对中小企业创新发展的比较分析,确定了乌克兰戒严法下小型和微型企业的发展趋势,确定了创新在乌克兰战后经济复苏中的作用,并对欧盟中小企业实施创新的监管方法进行了思考。欧盟 "新创新视角 "的全球范式是,通过实施促进创新和新知识的积极政策,欧盟成员国正在推动过去具有再分配性质的地区政策日益具有结构性创新政策的特征。通过将成员国自身的国家创新战略与参与超国家的泛欧创新计划相结合,实现了协同效应。同时,近年来的一个特点是,欧盟的超国家机构更倾向于不是通过直接资助,而是通过激励各地区发展创新基础设施,作为创新政策发展的一部分,来帮助各地区。创新活动的发展应成为加强与其他国家合作和乌克兰进入全球创新社区的工具。参与国际创新计划、项目和会议将促进各国之间的经验和技术交流,并吸引外国投资者到乌克兰投资。国家、企业和研究机构之间的合作将成为在乌克兰建立创新生态系统的基础。有效利用国家资源和潜力、吸引有才华的专业人员和初创企业(这将有助于经济发展和提高生活水平),将确保为小型和微型企业的创新活动创造有利环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE IMPACT OF STRATEGIC HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ON THE COMPETITIVENESS OF AN ENTERPRISE STRATEGY FOR INCREASING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE TESLA ELECTRIC VEHICLE THE ROLE OF INVESTMENT FINANCING IN THE OPERATION OF A OIL REFINERY TOURISM SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS AND THE PROSPECTS FOR CREATING AN ETHNOVISUAL TOURISM ATLAS IN ADJARA INNOVATIVE ASPECTS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF SMES: EXPERIENCE OF THE EU AND UKRAINE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1