Correlation between bispectral index and FOUR score in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional study

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1080/11101849.2023.2278868
Hanan Mohamed Mohamed Mohamed Mostafa, Ahmed Mohamed Mortada Mohamed, Ahmed Mukhtar, Alaa Bahaa Taha, Heba Bakr, Sara Farouk Kasem Habib
{"title":"Correlation between bispectral index and FOUR score in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Hanan Mohamed Mohamed Mohamed Mostafa, Ahmed Mohamed Mortada Mohamed, Ahmed Mukhtar, Alaa Bahaa Taha, Heba Bakr, Sara Farouk Kasem Habib","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2278868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction For neurological testing and monitoring of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients whose verbal component of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) cannot be assessed, the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score has been established. In order to determine the degree of awareness in patients with traumatic brain injury, this study will correlate the FOUR score with the bispectral index (BIS) and global consciousness score (GCS). Methods Twenty TBI patients with traumatic brain injury who were hospitalised to the surgical ICU at Cairo University Hospital participated in our prospective observational research. An observer who was blind to the BIS values assessed each of the FOUR scores and GCS (Covidien BIS complete monitoring system, Mansfield, MA, USA). Each patient provided four sets of readings. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to perform a correlation between the FOUR score, GCS, and BIS (r). Results There was a significant correlation between BIS and FOUR score (r = 0.854, 95% confidence interval: 0.780–0.904) (P < 0.001). There was also a significant correlation between BIS and GCS (r = 0.864, 95% confidence interval: 0.795–0.911) (P < 0.001). Conclusion There is a strong correlation between FOUR score, GCS, and BIS values in patients with traumatic brain injury. FOUR score seems a reliable alternative for GCS and BIS in the assessment of degree of consciousness, especially in intubated patients.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"16 8 1","pages":"943 - 946"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2278868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction For neurological testing and monitoring of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients whose verbal component of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) cannot be assessed, the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score has been established. In order to determine the degree of awareness in patients with traumatic brain injury, this study will correlate the FOUR score with the bispectral index (BIS) and global consciousness score (GCS). Methods Twenty TBI patients with traumatic brain injury who were hospitalised to the surgical ICU at Cairo University Hospital participated in our prospective observational research. An observer who was blind to the BIS values assessed each of the FOUR scores and GCS (Covidien BIS complete monitoring system, Mansfield, MA, USA). Each patient provided four sets of readings. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to perform a correlation between the FOUR score, GCS, and BIS (r). Results There was a significant correlation between BIS and FOUR score (r = 0.854, 95% confidence interval: 0.780–0.904) (P < 0.001). There was also a significant correlation between BIS and GCS (r = 0.864, 95% confidence interval: 0.795–0.911) (P < 0.001). Conclusion There is a strong correlation between FOUR score, GCS, and BIS values in patients with traumatic brain injury. FOUR score seems a reliable alternative for GCS and BIS in the assessment of degree of consciousness, especially in intubated patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑外伤重症患者双光谱指数与 FOUR 评分之间的相关性:横断面研究
ABSTRACT 引言 对于无法评估格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)言语部分的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的神经测试和监测,已经建立了无反应全轮廓(FOUR)评分。为了确定脑外伤患者的意识程度,本研究将把 FOUR 评分与双光谱指数(BIS)和总体意识评分(GCS)相关联。方法 20 名在开罗大学医院外科重症监护室住院的创伤性脑损伤患者参加了我们的前瞻性观察研究。由一名对 BIS 值视而不见的观察员评估每项 FOUR 评分和 GCS(Covidien BIS 完整监测系统,美国马萨诸塞州曼斯菲尔德)。每位患者提供四组读数。采用斯皮尔曼相关系数对 FOUR 评分、GCS 和 BIS(r)进行相关性分析。结果 BIS 和 FOUR 评分之间存在明显的相关性(r = 0.854,95% 置信区间:0.780-0.904)(P < 0.001)。BIS 和 GCS 之间也存在明显相关性(r = 0.864,95% 置信区间:0.795-0.911)(P < 0.001)。结论 脑外伤患者的 FOUR 评分、GCS 和 BIS 值之间存在很强的相关性。在评估意识程度时,FOUR 评分似乎是 GCS 和 BIS 的可靠替代方案,尤其是在插管患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal levo-bupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for inguinal hernia repairs in ex-preterm infants: A double blinded randomized prospective study Comparison of two different methods as reliable predictors of successful caudal block in children Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol on early cognitive functions in elderly patients after lumbar disc surgery Muscle wasting assessed by ultrasound versus scoring systems as early predictor of outcomes of intensive care unit stay in critically ill patients Posterior quadratus lumborum versus caudal epidural block for perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing upper abdominal surgeries: Arandomized, double-blind trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1