Access to Qualitative Inquiry: An Internal Dialogue

James Bernauer
{"title":"Access to Qualitative Inquiry: An Internal Dialogue","authors":"James Bernauer","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the theme of the TQR 15th Annual Conference – “Qualitative Inquiry; Access Denied?” this article introspectively examines through a self-interview what I have learned and experienced and my “evolution” in relation to qualitative inquiry. My journey began firmly in the quantitative/rationalistic camp, and I now find myself midway between this camp and the qualitative/naturalistic camp. Is this an integrated space that provides a home to practice mixed methods and a more natural and authentic way to go about discovery and learning?","PeriodicalId":256338,"journal":{"name":"The Qualitative Report","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Qualitative Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the theme of the TQR 15th Annual Conference – “Qualitative Inquiry; Access Denied?” this article introspectively examines through a self-interview what I have learned and experienced and my “evolution” in relation to qualitative inquiry. My journey began firmly in the quantitative/rationalistic camp, and I now find myself midway between this camp and the qualitative/naturalistic camp. Is this an integrated space that provides a home to practice mixed methods and a more natural and authentic way to go about discovery and learning?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
获取定性调查:内部对话
本文以第 15 届 TQR 年会的主题--"定性探究;被拒绝的机会?"为基础,通过自我访谈的方式,对我在定性探究方面所学到的知识和经历以及我的 "演变 "进行了反思。我的研究之路始于定量/理性主义阵营,而现在我发现自己处于该阵营与定性/自然主义阵营的中间地带。这是否是一个综合的空间,提供了一个实践混合方法的家园,以及一种更自然、更真实的探索和学习方式?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-Directed Learning in a Qualitative Research Methods Course for Doctoral Students Teaching Staff Mathematics University: Catalyst of the Emotional-Techno-Ontological Logic Navigating Credibility and Approachability in Conflict Zones: Insights from Fieldwork in Nigerian Communities Facing Eco-Violence Using Triangulation and Crystallization to Make Qualitative Studies Trustworthy and Rigorous Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Influence on Environmental Practices: Evidence from the Malaysian Aviation Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1