Equal Representation of Women in the Superior Judiciary: A Comparative Analysis between Pakistan and the United Kingdom

Rida Tahir
{"title":"Equal Representation of Women in the Superior Judiciary: A Comparative Analysis between Pakistan and the United Kingdom","authors":"Rida Tahir","doi":"10.1163/15718158-24030001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pakistan does not have a senior judiciary that is representative of its population. Women are under-represented. There had never been any female Justices of the Supreme Court of Pakistan until January 2022, when Justice Ayesha Malik was appointed as the first female Supreme Court judge. Although there is no constitutional bar to appointing women to be judges, the system for appointing judges is based on outmoded notions of seniority that are hostile to women’s desire for career progression. The United Kingdom (UK) provides a valid comparison since the legal system of Pakistan is based on English law. The UK has been marginally more successful in promoting female judges. The UK features a more open and transparent system, from which Pakistan should consider borrowing elements, specifically, an independent Judicial Appointments Commission (jac). The UK model suggests that more positive change may occur in the future. A quota system may be effective in increasing appointments in Pakistan, although this may create its own difficulties. More fundamentally, building into the appointments process the recognition that women may have different social responsibilities than men may also facilitate change.","PeriodicalId":35216,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-24030001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pakistan does not have a senior judiciary that is representative of its population. Women are under-represented. There had never been any female Justices of the Supreme Court of Pakistan until January 2022, when Justice Ayesha Malik was appointed as the first female Supreme Court judge. Although there is no constitutional bar to appointing women to be judges, the system for appointing judges is based on outmoded notions of seniority that are hostile to women’s desire for career progression. The United Kingdom (UK) provides a valid comparison since the legal system of Pakistan is based on English law. The UK has been marginally more successful in promoting female judges. The UK features a more open and transparent system, from which Pakistan should consider borrowing elements, specifically, an independent Judicial Appointments Commission (jac). The UK model suggests that more positive change may occur in the future. A quota system may be effective in increasing appointments in Pakistan, although this may create its own difficulties. More fundamentally, building into the appointments process the recognition that women may have different social responsibilities than men may also facilitate change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女在高级司法机构中的平等代表权:巴基斯坦与英国的比较分析
巴基斯坦没有一个能够代表本国人口的高级司法机构。妇女的代表性不足。在 2022 年 1 月 Ayesha Malik 法官被任命为首位最高法院女法官之前,巴基斯坦最高法院从未有过女法官。虽然宪法没有禁止任命妇女担任法官,但法官任命制度是基于过时的资历观念,不利于妇女的职业发展愿望。由于巴基斯坦的法律制度是以英国法律为基础的,因此英国提供了一个有效的比较。英国在提拔女法官方面略胜一筹。英国的制度更加公开透明,巴基斯坦应考虑借鉴英国的制度,特别是独立的司法任命委员会(jac)。英国的模式表明,未来可能会出现更多积极的变化。配额制度可能会有效增加巴基斯坦的任命人数,尽管这可能会造成自身的困难。更根本的是,在任命过程中承认女性可能承担着与男性不同的社会责任,也可能促进变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law is the world’s only law journal offering scholars a forum in which to present comparative, international and national research dealing specifically with issues of law and human rights in the Asia-Pacific region. Neither a lobby group nor tied to any particular ideology, the Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law is a scientific journal dedicated to responding to the need for a periodical publication dealing with the legal challenges of human rights issues in one of the world’s most diverse and dynamic regions.
期刊最新文献
Religious Exemptions and the Constitutionality of Vaccine Mandates in the Philippines Equal Representation of Women in the Superior Judiciary: A Comparative Analysis between Pakistan and the United Kingdom Decriminalisation of Adultery in Taiwan Empathy, a Hallmark of Equality: Shaping Fearlessness Into Transformative Decision-Making and Teaching Microverse, Mezzoverse, Macroverse: Protection Against Discrimination in an Artificialised World?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1