Negotiating regime complexity: Following a regime complex in the making

IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1017/s0260210523000402
A. Langlet, A. Vadrot
{"title":"Negotiating regime complexity: Following a regime complex in the making","authors":"A. Langlet, A. Vadrot","doi":"10.1017/s0260210523000402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article broadens the understanding and empirical study of regime complexes by shifting the focus from the negotiation outcome to the processes of negotiating new international agreements. Although they are important to regime-complex formation and delimitation, the sites where states negotiate new agreements are rather neglected. We aim to enhance the methodological toolbox available to scholars studying global governance in two ways: (1) by demonstrating how dynamic relationships between states and international organisations (IOs) unfolding within the social space of international treaty negotiations contribute to regime-complex formation; and (2) how social network analysis (SNA) can help us to detect patterns in these relationships. Combining participant observation and collaborative event ethnography (CEE) with social network analysis, we present new empirical material illustrating how we delimited a regime complex and how IOs interact throughout the negotiation process. We applied our methodology to the case of marine-biodiversity governance and use observational data collected during three intergovernmental conferences (IGCs) (2018–19) on a new treaty for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ) for our analysis. We discuss the results in relation to our approach’s strengths and weaknesses and implications for future research on regime complexity.","PeriodicalId":48017,"journal":{"name":"Review of International Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210523000402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article broadens the understanding and empirical study of regime complexes by shifting the focus from the negotiation outcome to the processes of negotiating new international agreements. Although they are important to regime-complex formation and delimitation, the sites where states negotiate new agreements are rather neglected. We aim to enhance the methodological toolbox available to scholars studying global governance in two ways: (1) by demonstrating how dynamic relationships between states and international organisations (IOs) unfolding within the social space of international treaty negotiations contribute to regime-complex formation; and (2) how social network analysis (SNA) can help us to detect patterns in these relationships. Combining participant observation and collaborative event ethnography (CEE) with social network analysis, we present new empirical material illustrating how we delimited a regime complex and how IOs interact throughout the negotiation process. We applied our methodology to the case of marine-biodiversity governance and use observational data collected during three intergovernmental conferences (IGCs) (2018–19) on a new treaty for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ) for our analysis. We discuss the results in relation to our approach’s strengths and weaknesses and implications for future research on regime complexity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谈判复杂的制度:跟踪正在形成的复杂制度
本文将重点从谈判结果转向新国际协定的谈判过程,从而拓宽了对制度复合体的理解和实证研究。虽然它们对制度复合体的形成和划界很重要,但国家谈判新协议的场所却被忽视了。我们的目标是通过以下两种方式增强学者们研究全球治理的方法论工具箱:(1) 展示在国际条约谈判的社会空间中展开的国家与国际组织(IOs)之间的动态关系如何促进制度复合体的形成;(2) 社会网络分析(SNA)如何帮助我们发现这些关系中的模式。我们将参与观察和协作事件人种学(CEE)与社会网络分析相结合,提供了新的经验材料,说明我们如何划分制度复合体,以及国际组织在整个谈判过程中如何互动。我们将我们的方法应用于海洋生物多样性治理案例,并使用在三次政府间会议(IGCs)(2018-19 年)期间收集的观察数据进行分析,这些会议是关于国家管辖范围以外海洋生物多样性(BBNJ)的保护和可持续利用的新条约。我们将结合我们方法的优缺点和对未来制度复杂性研究的影响来讨论结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of International Studies
Review of International Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Review of International Studies serves the needs of scholars in international relations and related fields such as politics, history, law, and sociology. The Review publishes a significant number of high quality research articles, review articles which survey new contributions to the field, a forum section to accommodate debates and replies, and occasional interviews with leading scholars.
期刊最新文献
Exposing linguistic imperialism: Why global IR has to be multilingual Un-suturing Westphalian IR via non-Western literature: A Grey Man (1963) RIS volume 50 issue 1 Cover and Front matter RIS volume 50 issue 1 Cover and Back matter Cosmologies of conquest: The Renaissance foundations of modern international thought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1