On the markedness of tense-aspect stems in Classical Armenian

Q1 Arts and Humanities Indo-European Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI:10.1163/22125892-bja10028
P. Kocharov
{"title":"On the markedness of tense-aspect stems in Classical Armenian","authors":"P. Kocharov","doi":"10.1163/22125892-bja10028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper offers a synchronic and diachronic account of markedness of the oppositional tense-aspect stems in Classical Armenian. The synchronic part explores the correspondence between markedness and productivity of verb classes as attested in the Armenian Bible translation, as well as the correspondence between markedness and token frequency of a selection of fifty most frequent verbs in the same text. The default pattern, characterized by an unmarked present and marked aorist stems, constitutes some two-thirds of the entire dataset but is less common in the most frequent verbs. By contrast, the two patterns with the unmarked aorist are significantly better represented and the token frequency of their aorist stems is typically higher for such verbs. This evidence is discussed in the context of a typological generalization predicting the lower markedness of more frequently used forms. An outlook on the historical grammar of Classical Armenian suggests that the attested system reflects a transition from aspect- to tense-oriented marking of stems.","PeriodicalId":36822,"journal":{"name":"Indo-European Linguistics","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indo-European Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22125892-bja10028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper offers a synchronic and diachronic account of markedness of the oppositional tense-aspect stems in Classical Armenian. The synchronic part explores the correspondence between markedness and productivity of verb classes as attested in the Armenian Bible translation, as well as the correspondence between markedness and token frequency of a selection of fifty most frequent verbs in the same text. The default pattern, characterized by an unmarked present and marked aorist stems, constitutes some two-thirds of the entire dataset but is less common in the most frequent verbs. By contrast, the two patterns with the unmarked aorist are significantly better represented and the token frequency of their aorist stems is typically higher for such verbs. This evidence is discussed in the context of a typological generalization predicting the lower markedness of more frequently used forms. An outlook on the historical grammar of Classical Armenian suggests that the attested system reflects a transition from aspect- to tense-oriented marking of stems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论古典亚美尼亚语中时态方面词干的标记性
本文对古典亚美尼亚语中对立时态词干的标记性进行了同步和非同步研究。同步部分探讨了亚美尼亚语《圣经》译本中动词类别的标记性和生产率之间的对应关系,以及同一文本中精选的 50 个最常用动词的标记性和标记频率之间的对应关系。默认模式的特点是无标记的现在时和有标记的动名词词干,约占整个数据集的三分之二,但在最常出现的动词中并不常见。相比之下,无标记动名词的两种模式在这类动词中的代表性要高得多,而且其动名词词干的标记频率通常也较高。这一证据将在预测使用频率较高的形式标记率较低的类型学概括中加以讨论。对古典亚美尼亚语历史语法的展望表明,已证实的系统反映了词干标记从以方面为主向以时态为主的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indo-European Linguistics
Indo-European Linguistics Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Latin vowel weakening in phonetic perspective Identifiers and reflexives in Old Albanian Vedic evidence for the verbal-governing dā́ti-vāra- ‘type’ The origin of Attic Reduplication On the markedness of tense-aspect stems in Classical Armenian
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1