The Regulatory Standards of Extraordinary Circumstances in Carriage of Passengers by Air: An Analysis of EU law and Implications for Korea

Ji-Min Sur
{"title":"The Regulatory Standards of Extraordinary Circumstances in Carriage of Passengers by Air: An Analysis of EU law and Implications for Korea","authors":"Ji-Min Sur","doi":"10.16980/jitc.19.5.202310.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the statutory framework and Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) case law concerning the extraordinary circumstances under EC 261/2004 Regulation (the Regulation). This paper also conducts an examination of the compensation liability system of air carriers within the context of Korean aviation transportation laws. Design/Methodology/Approach - This paper studies the scopes, application, and requirements of the extraordinary circumstances in EC 261/2004 Regulation by analyzing cases of CJEU. It seeks to conduct a detailed analysis of extraordinary circumstances in the Korean Aviation Business Act, and contains a comparative analysis between the Regulation and the stance of Korean law. Findings - This paper confirms that previous CJEU cases have taken a stringent and passive stance in recognizing extraordinary circumstances that exempt carriers from compensation liability. Also, it presents some critical views against CJEU perspectives and offers several implications for Korean law in its conclusion. Research Implications - This paper sheds light on legal issues surrounding applications of the extraordinary circumstances in EC 261/2004 Regulation via case law review. In conclusion, it emphasizes the need for amending the Regulation by explicitly specifying the criteria for the application of extraordinary circumstances to better ensure the appropriate fulfillment of air passenger rights protection. This suggests that it is essential to establish uniform legal standards for procedures related to compensation for air passengers in cases of denied boarding, flight cancellation, or flight delays, rather than solely relying on the flight compensation terms and conditions in Korea.","PeriodicalId":166989,"journal":{"name":"Korea International Trade Research Institute","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea International Trade Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.19.5.202310.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the statutory framework and Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) case law concerning the extraordinary circumstances under EC 261/2004 Regulation (the Regulation). This paper also conducts an examination of the compensation liability system of air carriers within the context of Korean aviation transportation laws. Design/Methodology/Approach - This paper studies the scopes, application, and requirements of the extraordinary circumstances in EC 261/2004 Regulation by analyzing cases of CJEU. It seeks to conduct a detailed analysis of extraordinary circumstances in the Korean Aviation Business Act, and contains a comparative analysis between the Regulation and the stance of Korean law. Findings - This paper confirms that previous CJEU cases have taken a stringent and passive stance in recognizing extraordinary circumstances that exempt carriers from compensation liability. Also, it presents some critical views against CJEU perspectives and offers several implications for Korean law in its conclusion. Research Implications - This paper sheds light on legal issues surrounding applications of the extraordinary circumstances in EC 261/2004 Regulation via case law review. In conclusion, it emphasizes the need for amending the Regulation by explicitly specifying the criteria for the application of extraordinary circumstances to better ensure the appropriate fulfillment of air passenger rights protection. This suggests that it is essential to establish uniform legal standards for procedures related to compensation for air passengers in cases of denied boarding, flight cancellation, or flight delays, rather than solely relying on the flight compensation terms and conditions in Korea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
航空旅客运输中特殊情况的监管标准:欧盟法律分析及对韩国的影响
目的--本文旨在回顾欧盟委员会第 261/2004 号条例(《条例》)中有关特殊情况的法定框架和欧盟法院(CJEU)判例法。本文还结合韩国航空运输法,对航空承运人的赔偿责任制度进行了研究。 设计/方法/途径 - 本文通过分析欧盟法院 (CJEU) 的案例,研究了 EC 261/2004 法规中特殊情况的范围、适用和要求。本文试图对《韩国航空商务法》中的非常情况进行详细分析,并包含《条例》与韩国法律立场之间的比较分析。 研究结果 - 本文证实,欧盟法院之前的案例在承认免除承运人赔偿责任的特殊情况时采取了严格和被动的立场。此外,本文还针对欧盟法院的观点提出了一些批评意见,并在结论中对韩国法律提出了若干启示。 研究意义--本文通过对判例法的回顾,揭示了围绕 EC 261/2004 法规中特殊情况应用的法律问题。最后,本文强调有必要修订该条例,明确规定适用非常情况的标准,以更好地确保航空旅客权利保护的适当实现。这表明,有必要为拒绝登机、航班取消或航班延误情况下的航空乘客赔偿相关程序制定统一的法律标准,而不是仅仅依赖于韩国的航班赔偿条款和条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Logistics Efficiency and FTAs on International Trade: The Experience of G-20 Countries A Study on the Intention of Product Loyalists to Act as Independent Entrepreneurs in China’s Network Marketing Industry: Focused on the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior A Comprehensive Analysis of Customers’ Impulsive Buying Behavior in Live Commerce The Effect of Consumer Lifestyle on the Acceptance Intention of Fully Autonomous Vehicles: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Safety The Impact of Introducing Experiential Factors on Willingness to Pay a Premium at Fairs: An Application of the Contingent Valuation Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1