Vertebral artery is an anatomical landmark in the posterior unilateral resection of cervical benign nerve sheath tumors with dumbbell extension of Eden type 2 or 3

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_84_23
Ryokichi Yagi, Masao Fukumura, Naoki Omura, R. Hiramatsu, Masahiro Kameda, N. Nonoguchi, M. Furuse, Shinji Kawabata, Toshihiro Takami, M. Wanibuchi
{"title":"Vertebral artery is an anatomical landmark in the posterior unilateral resection of cervical benign nerve sheath tumors with dumbbell extension of Eden type 2 or 3","authors":"Ryokichi Yagi, Masao Fukumura, Naoki Omura, R. Hiramatsu, Masahiro Kameda, N. Nonoguchi, M. Furuse, Shinji Kawabata, Toshihiro Takami, M. Wanibuchi","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_84_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the cervical nerve sheath tumor (NST) surgery with dumbbell extension of Eden type 2 or 3, selection of anterior, posterior, or combined approach remains controversial. Objectives: This technical note aimed to propose possible advantages of the posterior unilateral approach (PUA). Methods: Six patients who underwent the surgical treatment of cervical NSTs with dumbbell extension of Eden type 2 or 3 were included. The critical surgical steps included (1) complete separation of extradural and intradural procedures, (2) careful peeling of the neural membranes (epineurium and perineurium) from the tumor surface in the extradural procedure, (3) complete removal of the extradural tumor within the neural membranes, (4) intradural disconnection of tumor origin, and (5) intentional tumor removal up to the vertebral artery (VA), i.e., the VA line. Results: The tumor location of dumbbell extension was Eden types 2 and 3 in two and four patients. Gross total resection was achieved in two patients and intentional posterior removal of the tumor to the VA line was achieved in the remaining four patients. No vascular or neural injuries associated with surgical procedures occurred. Postoperative neurological assessment revealed no symptomatic aggravation in all patients. No secondary surgery was performed during the study period. Conclusion: PUA was safe and less invasive for functional recovery and tumor resection, if the anatomical relationship between the tumor and VA is clearly understood. The VA line is an important anatomical landmark to limit the extent of tumor resection.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_84_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the cervical nerve sheath tumor (NST) surgery with dumbbell extension of Eden type 2 or 3, selection of anterior, posterior, or combined approach remains controversial. Objectives: This technical note aimed to propose possible advantages of the posterior unilateral approach (PUA). Methods: Six patients who underwent the surgical treatment of cervical NSTs with dumbbell extension of Eden type 2 or 3 were included. The critical surgical steps included (1) complete separation of extradural and intradural procedures, (2) careful peeling of the neural membranes (epineurium and perineurium) from the tumor surface in the extradural procedure, (3) complete removal of the extradural tumor within the neural membranes, (4) intradural disconnection of tumor origin, and (5) intentional tumor removal up to the vertebral artery (VA), i.e., the VA line. Results: The tumor location of dumbbell extension was Eden types 2 and 3 in two and four patients. Gross total resection was achieved in two patients and intentional posterior removal of the tumor to the VA line was achieved in the remaining four patients. No vascular or neural injuries associated with surgical procedures occurred. Postoperative neurological assessment revealed no symptomatic aggravation in all patients. No secondary surgery was performed during the study period. Conclusion: PUA was safe and less invasive for functional recovery and tumor resection, if the anatomical relationship between the tumor and VA is clearly understood. The VA line is an important anatomical landmark to limit the extent of tumor resection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎动脉是伊登 2 型或 3 型哑铃状扩展的颈椎良性神经鞘瘤单侧后方切除术的解剖标记
背景:在伊登 2 型或 3 型哑铃状扩展的颈神经鞘瘤(NST)手术中,选择前路、后路还是联合入路仍存在争议。目的:本技术说明旨在提出后路单侧入路(PUA)可能具有的优势。方法:纳入了六名接受手术治疗的伊登 2 型或 3 型哑铃伸展型颈椎 NST 患者。手术的关键步骤包括:(1)硬膜外和硬膜内手术完全分离;(2)在硬膜外手术中仔细剥离肿瘤表面的神经膜(外膜和会厌);(3)完全切除神经膜内的硬膜外肿瘤;(4)硬膜内肿瘤起源断开;(5)有意将肿瘤切除至椎动脉(VA),即 VA 线。结果2例和4例患者的哑铃状扩展肿瘤位置为Eden 2型和3型。两名患者实现了肿瘤全切,其余四名患者实现了肿瘤后方至 VA 线的有意切除。手术过程中未出现血管或神经损伤。术后神经评估显示,所有患者均无症状加重。研究期间没有进行二次手术。结论如果清楚地了解肿瘤与VA之间的解剖关系,PUA对于功能恢复和肿瘤切除是安全的,创伤也较小。VA线是限制肿瘤切除范围的重要解剖标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Catastrophic spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma following thrombolysis: An intersection of neurosurgical and cardiological challenges - An institutional experience. Chronic muscle pain and spasm hallmarks of spinal instability. Comparison of postoperative complications and outcomes following primary versus revision discectomy: A national database analysis. Correlation between sagittal morphology of lower lumbar end plate and degenerative changes in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Demographics in the context of health-care delivery for C1 and C2 fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1