Overcoming coloniality in adolescent health programmes: harnessing cultural values and the indigenous roles of grandmothers to promote girls’ holistic development in Senegal

Anneke Newman, J. Aubel, M. Coulibaly
{"title":"Overcoming coloniality in adolescent health programmes: harnessing cultural values and the indigenous roles of grandmothers to promote girls’ holistic development in Senegal","authors":"Anneke Newman, J. Aubel, M. Coulibaly","doi":"10.1080/13552074.2023.2259199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Decolonial and feminist scholars have long pointed out that theory and praxis in global health and gender and development employ models of gender and social change that are Euro-North-American-centric and fit poorly with cultural realities and community dynamics in the global South. Interventions informed by these biases are often minimally effective and can cause backlash or resistance. In this paper, we unpack how coloniality informs some of the dominant approaches used by major organisations to improve the health and well-being of adolescent girls, and why they can result in ineffective and sometimes harmful interventions. The limitations of these approaches include top-down imposed objectives and pathways to change; individualist, sexist, ageist, and modernist biases; and ignorance or denigration of local cultural values, resources, and family and community dynamics. Instead, we present the Girls’ Holistic Development (GHD) programme – implemented by NGO The Grandmother Project – Change Through Culture (GMP) in Senegal since 2009 – as a decolonial alternative. The GHD is informed by theories and methodologies from participatory and community development; anthropology; family and community systems theory; community, cultural, and Indigenous psychology; and transformative learning/adult education. Results show that GMP has contributed to shifting social norms underpinning child and forced marriage, female genital cutting, adolescent pregnancy, and premature school-leaving because its approach offers an alternative decolonial vision of, and method of achieving, adolescent girls’ development. The key facets of this approach are that it is culturally affirming, inter-generational, grandmother-inclusive, assets-based, and rooted in building community capacity and consensus for change towards locally defined objectives.","PeriodicalId":12515,"journal":{"name":"Gender & Development","volume":"158 1","pages":"637 - 659"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2023.2259199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Decolonial and feminist scholars have long pointed out that theory and praxis in global health and gender and development employ models of gender and social change that are Euro-North-American-centric and fit poorly with cultural realities and community dynamics in the global South. Interventions informed by these biases are often minimally effective and can cause backlash or resistance. In this paper, we unpack how coloniality informs some of the dominant approaches used by major organisations to improve the health and well-being of adolescent girls, and why they can result in ineffective and sometimes harmful interventions. The limitations of these approaches include top-down imposed objectives and pathways to change; individualist, sexist, ageist, and modernist biases; and ignorance or denigration of local cultural values, resources, and family and community dynamics. Instead, we present the Girls’ Holistic Development (GHD) programme – implemented by NGO The Grandmother Project – Change Through Culture (GMP) in Senegal since 2009 – as a decolonial alternative. The GHD is informed by theories and methodologies from participatory and community development; anthropology; family and community systems theory; community, cultural, and Indigenous psychology; and transformative learning/adult education. Results show that GMP has contributed to shifting social norms underpinning child and forced marriage, female genital cutting, adolescent pregnancy, and premature school-leaving because its approach offers an alternative decolonial vision of, and method of achieving, adolescent girls’ development. The key facets of this approach are that it is culturally affirming, inter-generational, grandmother-inclusive, assets-based, and rooted in building community capacity and consensus for change towards locally defined objectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克服青少年健康计划中的殖民主义:利用塞内加尔的文化价值观和祖母的本土作用促进女童的全面发展
ABSTRACT 非殖民地学者和女权学者早就指出,全球卫生、性别与发展领域的理论和实践所采用的性别和社会变革模式是以欧洲-北美为中心的,与全球南部的文化现实和社区动态不相适应。基于这些偏见的干预措施往往收效甚微,并可能引起反弹或抵制。在本文中,我们将阐述殖民主义是如何影响主要组织为改善少女健康和福祉而采用的一些主流方法的,以及为什么这些方法会导致干预措施无效,有时甚至有害。这些方法的局限性包括:自上而下强加的目标和变革途径;个人主义、性别主义、年龄主义和现代主义偏见;以及对当地文化价值观、资源、家庭和社区动态的无知或诋毁。相反,我们提出了 "女童全面发展"(GHD)计划--由非政府组织 "祖母项目--通过文化变革"(GMP)自 2009 年起在塞内加尔实施--作为一种非殖民主义的替代方案。女童全面发展计划借鉴了参与式发展和社区发展、人类学、家庭和社区系统理论、社区、文化和土著心理学以及变革学习/成人教育的理论和方法。结果表明,全球监测方案有助于改变导致童婚和强迫婚姻、切割女性生殖器官、少女怀孕和过早辍学的社会规范,因为其方法提供了实现少女发展的另一种非殖民化愿景和方法。这种方法的主要特点是,它具有文化肯定性、跨代性、祖母包容性、以资产为基础,并植根于建设社区能力和达成变革共识,以实现当地确定的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deaf cultures: towards decolonisation of body, disability, and deafness* The messy coloniality of gender and development in Indigenous Wixárika communities Perpetually Lost in Translation Who knows, who writes, and who decolonises? Dialogues about collaborative partnerships of a rural education initiative in post-accord Colombia Decolonising Southern knowledge(s) in Aidland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1