Unitary system of patent protection as an element of innovation policy of the European Union

K.Yu. Ivanova
{"title":"Unitary system of patent protection as an element of innovation policy of the European Union","authors":"K.Yu. Ivanova","doi":"10.15330/apiclu.62.2.11-2.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the process of establishing a unitary system of patent protection in the European Union as an alternative to national and regional systems and its importance for enhancing the innovation potential and economic development of the EU. It examines the preconditions for the transition from national patents to regional (and subsequently unitary) patents, which are based on the intention of the EU Member States to overcome the territorial principle of patent rights by extending the patent owner’s exclusive rights beyond the territorial borders of one state.It is noted that the transformation of the economy into an innovative one, in which a key role is assigned to intellectual property rights (as a precondition for innovation), has actualized the issue of effective intellectual property legal protection, in particular, concerning patent rights. Since 1997, the European Commission has been highlighting the importance of patents as one of the tools available for protecting innovation and the need to reform the European patent system to increase Europe’s innovation potential and competitiveness. Subsequent decisions of the EU Council were taken to fulfill this task, resulting in the introduction of a unitary system, which includes the European Patent with Unitary Effect (the Unitary Patent) and the Unified Patent Court, as of June 1, 2023. As a result, inventors can obtain unitary patent protection based on the Unitary Patent in all EU Member States participating in the enhanced cooperation mechanism.It is concluded that the unitary patent protection system extends the territoriality principle beyond the national borders of the State within the EU borders, but does not destroy the basic principles of intellectual property rights. In contrast, the article examines the US case law, which demonstrates its own approaches to understanding the principle of territoriality and the presumption against extraterritoriality of patent rights, allowing in certain cases the US patent holder to extend its monopoly to foreign markets.","PeriodicalId":196689,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.62.2.11-2.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the process of establishing a unitary system of patent protection in the European Union as an alternative to national and regional systems and its importance for enhancing the innovation potential and economic development of the EU. It examines the preconditions for the transition from national patents to regional (and subsequently unitary) patents, which are based on the intention of the EU Member States to overcome the territorial principle of patent rights by extending the patent owner’s exclusive rights beyond the territorial borders of one state.It is noted that the transformation of the economy into an innovative one, in which a key role is assigned to intellectual property rights (as a precondition for innovation), has actualized the issue of effective intellectual property legal protection, in particular, concerning patent rights. Since 1997, the European Commission has been highlighting the importance of patents as one of the tools available for protecting innovation and the need to reform the European patent system to increase Europe’s innovation potential and competitiveness. Subsequent decisions of the EU Council were taken to fulfill this task, resulting in the introduction of a unitary system, which includes the European Patent with Unitary Effect (the Unitary Patent) and the Unified Patent Court, as of June 1, 2023. As a result, inventors can obtain unitary patent protection based on the Unitary Patent in all EU Member States participating in the enhanced cooperation mechanism.It is concluded that the unitary patent protection system extends the territoriality principle beyond the national borders of the State within the EU borders, but does not destroy the basic principles of intellectual property rights. In contrast, the article examines the US case law, which demonstrates its own approaches to understanding the principle of territoriality and the presumption against extraterritoriality of patent rights, allowing in certain cases the US patent holder to extend its monopoly to foreign markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为欧洲联盟创新政策要素的统一专利保护制度
文章分析了在欧盟建立统一专利保护制度以替代国家和地区制度的过程及其对提高欧盟创新潜力和经济发展的重要性。文章探讨了从国家专利向地区专利(以及随后的统一专利)过渡的先决条件,这些先决条件的基础是欧盟成员国有意通过将专利所有人的专有权扩展到一国领土边界之外来克服专利权的地域性原则。文章指出,经济向创新型经济的转型(其中知识产权被赋予了关键作用(作为创新的先决条件))已将有效的知识产权法律保护问题,特别是有关专利权的法律保护问题具体化。自 1997 年以来,欧盟委员会一直强调专利作为保护创新工具之一的重要性,以及改革欧洲专利制度以提高欧洲创新潜力和竞争力的必要性。为完成这一任务,欧盟理事会随后做出决定,从 2023 年 6 月 1 日起引入统一体系,其中包括具有统一效力的欧洲专利(统一专利)和统一专利法院。因此,发明人可以在所有参与强化合作机制的欧盟成员国获得基于统一专利的统一专利保护。文章认为,统一专利保护制度将地域性原则扩展到欧盟边界内国家的国界之外,但并没有破坏知识产权的基本原则。与此相反,文章对美国的判例法进行了研究,美国的判例法展示了自己理解属地原则和反对专利权治外法权推定的方法,允许美国专利持有人在某些情况下将其垄断权扩展到外国市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidential activity of the court in civil and administrative proceedings: a comparative legal analysis The influence of jurisprudence of international treaty bodies on the interpretation of international treaties Administrative and legal mechanisms for ensuring the safety of the educational process in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine Simplified proceedings in the civil procedure of Poland Consideration of family cases by the court according to the rules of simplified litigation: a review of judicial practice and trends of change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1