Perfusion index as predictor of intraoperative hypotension following subarachnoid block in cesarean section: A prospective, observational study

Sandeep Singh, Gurpreeti Kaur, Richa Jain, Neeru Luthra, Namrata Sharma, Anju Grewal
{"title":"Perfusion index as predictor of intraoperative hypotension following subarachnoid block in cesarean section: A prospective, observational study","authors":"Sandeep Singh, Gurpreeti Kaur, Richa Jain, Neeru Luthra, Namrata Sharma, Anju Grewal","doi":"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_161_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Perfusion index (PI) can be used to assess peripheral perfusion dynamics as it depicts the changes in peripheral vascular tone. Increased risk of fall in blood pressure following subarachnoid block (SAB) has been reported in pregnant patients with raised PI value due to their decreased peripheral vascular resistance. This study aimed to evaluate PI as a noninvasive tool for predicting incidence and severity of maternal hypotension following SAB in parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS). Materials and Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted on 120 American Society of Anesthesiologists-II parturients undergoing LSCS under SAB. Noninvasive blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and PI were recorded at baseline and at 1-min interval till delivery of baby. Episodes of hypotension, bradycardia, total amount of vasopressor consumption, intraoperative nausea, vomiting (IONV), and APGAR scores were observed. Results: Receiver operator characteristics curve determined the optimal cutoff point for PI to predict intraoperative hypotension and IONV was 3.82 with a sensitivity of 79.07% and specificity of 72.73%. Incidence of hypotension in subjects with a higher baseline PI (≥3.82) was 79.1% compared with 20.9% with low baseline PI (<3.82). Amount of vasopressor used and incidence of IONV was significantly higher in subjects with high baseline PI (P < 0.001). Conclusions: There is a significant correlation between PI and SAB-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing LSCS. Pregnant patients with higher baseline PI (>3.82) are at a greater risk of developing hypotension.","PeriodicalId":8691,"journal":{"name":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"160 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_161_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perfusion index (PI) can be used to assess peripheral perfusion dynamics as it depicts the changes in peripheral vascular tone. Increased risk of fall in blood pressure following subarachnoid block (SAB) has been reported in pregnant patients with raised PI value due to their decreased peripheral vascular resistance. This study aimed to evaluate PI as a noninvasive tool for predicting incidence and severity of maternal hypotension following SAB in parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS). Materials and Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted on 120 American Society of Anesthesiologists-II parturients undergoing LSCS under SAB. Noninvasive blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and PI were recorded at baseline and at 1-min interval till delivery of baby. Episodes of hypotension, bradycardia, total amount of vasopressor consumption, intraoperative nausea, vomiting (IONV), and APGAR scores were observed. Results: Receiver operator characteristics curve determined the optimal cutoff point for PI to predict intraoperative hypotension and IONV was 3.82 with a sensitivity of 79.07% and specificity of 72.73%. Incidence of hypotension in subjects with a higher baseline PI (≥3.82) was 79.1% compared with 20.9% with low baseline PI (<3.82). Amount of vasopressor used and incidence of IONV was significantly higher in subjects with high baseline PI (P < 0.001). Conclusions: There is a significant correlation between PI and SAB-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing LSCS. Pregnant patients with higher baseline PI (>3.82) are at a greater risk of developing hypotension.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灌注指数作为剖宫产术中蛛网膜下腔阻滞术后术中低血压的预测指标:前瞻性观察研究
背景:灌注指数(PI)可用于评估外周灌注动态,因为它描述了外周血管张力的变化。有报道称,蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)后,由于外周血管阻力下降,PI 值升高的孕妇血压下降的风险增加。本研究旨在评估 PI,将其作为一种无创工具,用于预测接受下段剖宫产术(LSCS)的孕妇在蛛网膜下腔阻滞术(SAB)后产妇低血压的发生率和严重程度。材料和方法:对 120 名在 SAB 下接受 LSCS 的美国麻醉医师协会 II 级产妇进行了前瞻性观察研究。无创血压、心率(HR)和 PI 均在基线和婴儿娩出前每隔 1 分钟记录一次。观察低血压发作、心动过缓、血管加压素消耗总量、术中恶心、呕吐(IONV)和 APGAR 评分。结果受体运算特性曲线确定了预测术中低血压和 IONV 的最佳 PI 临界点为 3.82,灵敏度为 79.07%,特异度为 72.73%。基线 PI 较高(≥3.82)的受试者发生低血压的几率为 79.1%,而基线 PI 较低(3.82)的受试者发生低血压的几率为 20.9%,后者发生低血压的风险更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Selective Critically ill patients with tracheostomy are eligible for direct from intensive care unit sent home: Case series Comment on: Effects of different anesthetic techniques on neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and monocyte lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: A prospective, single-blind, randomized study Low procalcitonin clearance correlates with mortality treated with culture-matched antibiotics in intensive care unit: A retrospective, observational study Phenylephrine, ondansetron, or combination of both for prevention of intraoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section: A prospective, double-blind randomized control trial Artificial intelligence in anesthesia and critical care (part 1): Current perspective in critical care setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1