Utilizing Consumer-Directed Care Among Older Adults: Identifying Barriers From Behavioral Economics Perspectives.

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Research on Aging Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1177/01640275231226228
Jinbao Zhang, Julia Shu-Huah Wang, Wing Kit Chan
{"title":"Utilizing Consumer-Directed Care Among Older Adults: Identifying Barriers From Behavioral Economics Perspectives.","authors":"Jinbao Zhang, Julia Shu-Huah Wang, Wing Kit Chan","doi":"10.1177/01640275231226228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consumer-directed Care (CDC) empowers older people to flexibly arrange services and enhances their well-being. Prior studies have suggested that limited attention and hassle costs are major demand-side barriers to using CDC. However, many other psychosocial factors were unexplored. In this study, we explore associations between CDC utilization and a wider range of psychosocial factors based on behavioral economics theories. A cross-sectional telephone survey of older persons (or family members that represent them) was conducted in Guangzhou, China in 2021. We adopted a two-stage sampling method based on administrative records and analyzed the data using multivariate logistic models. Procedural literacy, hassle costs, and social norms regarding CDC were associated with using CDC. The findings reveal nuances in the decision-making process, and people are not unboundedly rational in making care-related decisions. Policymakers could employ cost-effective tools to facilitate CDC utilization and optimize resources to address the most crucial service barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47983,"journal":{"name":"Research on Aging","volume":" ","pages":"275-286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Aging","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275231226228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer-directed Care (CDC) empowers older people to flexibly arrange services and enhances their well-being. Prior studies have suggested that limited attention and hassle costs are major demand-side barriers to using CDC. However, many other psychosocial factors were unexplored. In this study, we explore associations between CDC utilization and a wider range of psychosocial factors based on behavioral economics theories. A cross-sectional telephone survey of older persons (or family members that represent them) was conducted in Guangzhou, China in 2021. We adopted a two-stage sampling method based on administrative records and analyzed the data using multivariate logistic models. Procedural literacy, hassle costs, and social norms regarding CDC were associated with using CDC. The findings reveal nuances in the decision-making process, and people are not unboundedly rational in making care-related decisions. Policymakers could employ cost-effective tools to facilitate CDC utilization and optimize resources to address the most crucial service barriers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在老年人中使用消费者指导护理:从行为经济学角度识别障碍。
消费者指导护理(CDC)赋予老年人灵活安排服务的权力,并提高他们的幸福感。先前的研究表明,有限的注意力和麻烦的费用是使用 "消费者指导护理 "的主要需求方障碍。然而,许多其他社会心理因素尚未得到研究。在本研究中,我们以行为经济学理论为基础,探讨了疾病预防控制中心的使用与更广泛的社会心理因素之间的关联。2021 年,我们在中国广州对老年人(或代表老年人的家庭成员)进行了横断面电话调查。我们采用了基于行政记录的两阶段抽样方法,并使用多变量逻辑模型对数据进行了分析。程序素养、麻烦成本和有关疾病预防控制的社会规范与使用疾病预防控制相关。研究结果揭示了决策过程中的细微差别,人们在做出与护理相关的决策时并非毫无理性可言。政策制定者可以采用具有成本效益的工具来促进疾病预防控制中心的使用,并优化资源以解决最关键的服务障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research on Aging
Research on Aging GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Research on Aging is an interdisciplinary journal designed to reflect the expanding role of research in the field of social gerontology. Research on Aging exists to provide for publication of research in the broad range of disciplines concerned with aging. Scholars from the disciplines of sociology, geriatrics, history, psychology, anthropology, public health, economics, political science, criminal justice, and social work are encouraged to contribute articles to the journal. Emphasis will be on materials of broad scope and cross-disciplinary interest. Assessment of the current state of knowledge is as important as provision of an outlet for new knowledge, so critical and review articles are welcomed. Systematic attention to particular topics will also be featured.
期刊最新文献
The Change is Personal: Perceptions of Neighborhood Decline Among African American Women Aging in Place. Spousal Caregiving Types and Cognitive Trajectories Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China. Linking Multi-Dimensional Religiosity in Childhood and Later Adulthood: Implications for Later Life Health. Key Informants' Visions and Solutions to Improve Home- and Community-Based Services for Older Adults and Persons With Dementia. Religious Involvement and Cognitive Function Among White, Black, and Hispanic Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1