Comparing the Effectiveness of Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction Training and Powell’s Cognitive Rehabilitation on Improving the Quality of Life of Stroke Patients

Fatemeh Shojaei, F. Shahabizadeh, Seyyed Mouhammad Mousavi Mirzaei, Mohammad Dehghanifiroozabadi, A. Esmaeili
{"title":"Comparing the Effectiveness of Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction Training and Powell’s Cognitive Rehabilitation on Improving the Quality of Life of Stroke Patients","authors":"Fatemeh Shojaei, F. Shahabizadeh, Seyyed Mouhammad Mousavi Mirzaei, Mohammad Dehghanifiroozabadi, A. Esmaeili","doi":"10.5812/mcj-142817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stroke is a type of neurological disorder that can be attributed to a central vascular cause. Stroke can affect the patient’s performance in daily activities and quality of life (QoL). Research indicates a decrease in the quality of life in stroke patients due to cognitive and emotional damage. Objectives: The present study compared the effect of two group approaches, mindfulness training based on stress reduction and Powell’s cognitive rehabilitation, on improving the quality of life of stroke patients. Methods: This semi-experimental study used a pretest-posttest design with a control group and a follow-up period. The sample consisted of 36 eligible stroke patients selected in a targeted and simple random manner. The patients were divided into two intervention groups and one control group. The tools used were a demographic information questionnaire and a Stroke-specific QoL (SS-QOL) scale. Data were analyzed with SPSS software (version. 26). Chi-square, repeated measures analysis of variance, and Bonferroni statistical tests were applied at a significance level of P 0.05). The mindfulness intervention had a higher effect on quality of life on average. Still, statistically, none of the interventions were effective in improving quality of life (P > 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the effect of mindfulness-based methods and cognitive rehabilitation on improving quality of life (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Mindfulness training increases behavioral responses related to attention as the basis of all cognitive activities. Also, mindfulness exercises improve cognitive skills and, by affecting the cognitive system, increase the capacity and ability of the information processing system and improve the quality of life.","PeriodicalId":18693,"journal":{"name":"Modern Care Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/mcj-142817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a type of neurological disorder that can be attributed to a central vascular cause. Stroke can affect the patient’s performance in daily activities and quality of life (QoL). Research indicates a decrease in the quality of life in stroke patients due to cognitive and emotional damage. Objectives: The present study compared the effect of two group approaches, mindfulness training based on stress reduction and Powell’s cognitive rehabilitation, on improving the quality of life of stroke patients. Methods: This semi-experimental study used a pretest-posttest design with a control group and a follow-up period. The sample consisted of 36 eligible stroke patients selected in a targeted and simple random manner. The patients were divided into two intervention groups and one control group. The tools used were a demographic information questionnaire and a Stroke-specific QoL (SS-QOL) scale. Data were analyzed with SPSS software (version. 26). Chi-square, repeated measures analysis of variance, and Bonferroni statistical tests were applied at a significance level of P 0.05). The mindfulness intervention had a higher effect on quality of life on average. Still, statistically, none of the interventions were effective in improving quality of life (P > 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the effect of mindfulness-based methods and cognitive rehabilitation on improving quality of life (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Mindfulness training increases behavioral responses related to attention as the basis of all cognitive activities. Also, mindfulness exercises improve cognitive skills and, by affecting the cognitive system, increase the capacity and ability of the information processing system and improve the quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较正念减压训练和鲍威尔认知康复训练对改善脑卒中患者生活质量的效果
背景:脑卒中是一种由中枢血管引起的神经系统疾病。中风会影响患者的日常活动能力和生活质量(QoL)。研究表明,由于认知和情感受损,中风患者的生活质量会下降。研究目的本研究比较了基于减压的正念训练和鲍威尔认知康复这两种团体方法对改善脑卒中患者生活质量的影响。方法:半实验研究:这项半实验性研究采用了前测-后测设计,设有对照组和随访期。样本包括以有针对性的简单随机方式选出的 36 名符合条件的脑卒中患者。患者被分为两个干预组和一个对照组。使用的工具包括人口统计学信息问卷和中风特异性 QoL(SS-QOL)量表。数据采用 SPSS 软件(26 版)进行分析。在显著性水平为 P 0.05 时,采用了卡方检验、重复测量方差分析和 Bonferroni 统计检验。)正念干预对生活质量的平均影响更大。尽管如此,从统计学角度来看,所有干预措施都不能有效改善生活质量(P > 0.05),正念方法和认知康复对改善生活质量的效果没有显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论正念训练能提高与注意力相关的行为反应,而注意力是所有认知活动的基础。此外,正念练习还能提高认知技能,并通过影响认知系统,提高信息处理系统的容量和能力,改善生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interfering Effect of Alcohol Swabbing on Capillary Blood Glucose Concentration Using a Glucometer Consumption of Apitherapy Products by Late Adolescents Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional and Comparative Descriptive Study The Experiences of Family Caregivers After Losing a Patient with Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Study Quality of Life in Children with Cerebral Palsy: The Role of Having Access to Rehabilitation Services Relationship Between Hyperuricemia and Hypertension in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1