Watchful Waiting Strategy in the Treatment of Acute Otitis Media in Children

Mahnaz Haghighi
{"title":"Watchful Waiting Strategy in the Treatment of Acute Otitis Media in Children","authors":"Mahnaz Haghighi","doi":"10.5812/jcp-141136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute otitis media (AOM) is a common issue among children, often requiring antibiotic treatment. It is crucial to explore methods for the rational use of antibiotics. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the watchful waiting approach in treating children aged 6 months to 18 years with mild to moderate AOM. Methods: This prospective quasi-experimental study was conducted on 100 children with mild to moderate AOM. All patients, except those in severe or critical conditions, were placed on the watchful waiting strategy. A follow-up was conducted after 48 - 72 hours. If symptoms had improved, the watchful waiting approach continued. If medication was necessary for various reasons, these reasons were documented. Subsequently, children who completed the watchful waiting strategy were compared to those who received antibiotics. The collected data were analyzed using chi-square and t-tests in SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 16.0). Results: In this study, 59 patients (59%) were treated with the watchful waiting approach; nevertheless, 41 patients (41%) received antibiotics. The presence or absence of postnasal discharge showed a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding fever (P = 0.066), enlarged tonsils (P = 0.740), snoring (P = 0.252), and bilateral involvement of the tympanic membrane (P = 0.313). Conclusions: Based on the results, the watchful waiting strategy is a cost-effective method for children aged over 6 months with mild to moderate symptoms, provided that parents cooperate fully. Clinicians should be cautious and consider alternative treatments if postnasal discharge is present, as it might indicate a higher likelihood of treatment failure with the watchful waiting approach.","PeriodicalId":506036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics","volume":"114 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jcp-141136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute otitis media (AOM) is a common issue among children, often requiring antibiotic treatment. It is crucial to explore methods for the rational use of antibiotics. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the watchful waiting approach in treating children aged 6 months to 18 years with mild to moderate AOM. Methods: This prospective quasi-experimental study was conducted on 100 children with mild to moderate AOM. All patients, except those in severe or critical conditions, were placed on the watchful waiting strategy. A follow-up was conducted after 48 - 72 hours. If symptoms had improved, the watchful waiting approach continued. If medication was necessary for various reasons, these reasons were documented. Subsequently, children who completed the watchful waiting strategy were compared to those who received antibiotics. The collected data were analyzed using chi-square and t-tests in SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 16.0). Results: In this study, 59 patients (59%) were treated with the watchful waiting approach; nevertheless, 41 patients (41%) received antibiotics. The presence or absence of postnasal discharge showed a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding fever (P = 0.066), enlarged tonsils (P = 0.740), snoring (P = 0.252), and bilateral involvement of the tympanic membrane (P = 0.313). Conclusions: Based on the results, the watchful waiting strategy is a cost-effective method for children aged over 6 months with mild to moderate symptoms, provided that parents cooperate fully. Clinicians should be cautious and consider alternative treatments if postnasal discharge is present, as it might indicate a higher likelihood of treatment failure with the watchful waiting approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗儿童急性中耳炎的观察等待策略
背景:急性中耳炎(AOM)是儿童的常见病,通常需要抗生素治疗。探索合理使用抗生素的方法至关重要。本研究旨在评估观察等待法治疗 6 个月至 18 岁轻度至中度急性中耳炎患儿的有效性。研究方法这项前瞻性准实验研究的对象是100名轻度至中度AOM患儿。除病情严重或危重的患儿外,所有患儿均被纳入观察等待策略。48-72 小时后进行随访。如果症状有所改善,则继续采取观察等待策略。如果由于各种原因需要用药,则将这些原因记录在案。随后,完成观察等待策略的儿童与接受抗生素治疗的儿童进行了比较。收集到的数据使用 SPSS Statistics for Windows(16.0 版)中的卡方检验和 t 检验进行分析。结果在这项研究中,59 名患者(59%)接受了观察等待法治疗;然而,41 名患者(41%)接受了抗生素治疗。两组患者鼻后有无分泌物差异显著(P = 0.001)。两组患者在发热(P = 0.066)、扁桃体肿大(P = 0.740)、打鼾(P = 0.252)和双侧鼓膜受累(P = 0.313)方面无明显差异。结论根据研究结果,对于 6 个月以上、有轻度至中度症状的儿童,只要家长充分配合,观察等待策略是一种经济有效的方法。如果出现鼻后分泌物,临床医生应谨慎考虑其他治疗方法,因为这可能预示着观察等待法治疗失败的可能性较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Combined Treatment of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Treatment as Usual on Depression, Anxiety and Anger in Adolescents with Bipolar Disorder Assessment of Behavioral Disorders in Iranian Children with Functional Constipation Association Between SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Cardiovascular Disease in Children and Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study Correlation Between Lung Clearance Index (LCI) and Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) in Children with Cystic Fibrosis (CF): A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring the Impact of Treating Functional Constipation on Headache Episodes in Children Suffering from Migraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1